A man buried in Romania in the Neolithic era

rom011
Portrait reconstruction
Specimen Details
Sample ID:
rom011
Date:
4836 BCE - 4687 BCE
Biological Sex:
Male
mtDNA:
J1c3
Y-DNA:
Not available
Cultural Period:
Iclod Culture
Location
Country:
Romania
Locality:
Iclod (Cluj, Iclod)
Coordinates:
Map Location
Historical Timeline
Description

The Iclod Culture of the Danubian region is a fascinating and intricate part of prehistoric Europe, flourishing during the Neolithic period, approximately around 4800-4500 BCE. This culture is primarily located in what is now modern-day Romania, along the banks of the Danube River, a crucial geographical feature that influenced the lifestyle, economy, and interactions of the Iclod people.

Geographical Context

Positioned in the heart of Central Europe, the Iclod Culture benefited from its proximity to the Danube. This river not only provided a source of fresh water but was also a conduit for trade and cultural exchange. The fertile plains of the Danubian basin supported agricultural activities, allowing the culture to thrive in a landscape that offered rich, arable land and abundant natural resources.

Economy and Subsistence

The economy of the Iclod Culture was primarily agrarian, with a strong emphasis on agriculture and animal husbandry. The people cultivated a variety of crops, including wheat, barley, and legumes, using early forms of farming techniques that were innovative for their time. They also domesticated animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats, which played a critical role in providing meat, milk, and wool, supplementing their diet and economy.

In addition to agriculture, the Iclod people engaged in hunting and fishing, exploiting the rich biodiversity of the Danubian region. The combination of these subsistence strategies ensured a stable and prosperous community, enabling population growth and the development of more complex societal structures.

Social Structure and Organization

The Iclod Culture exhibited signs of increasing social complexity. Evidence suggests the presence of social stratification, as seen in the differential burial practices and artifacts found in various archaeological sites. Some burials are accompanied by grave goods, which could indicate a distinction in social status and the emergence of leadership or elite classes within the society.

Material Culture and Technology

The Iclod Culture is noted for its advancements in pottery, tool-making, and architectural techniques, which were integral aspects of their daily lives. Pottery from this period is characterized by intricate geometric patterns and shapes, suggesting both practical uses and artistic expression. These items were often used for cooking, storage, and trade.

In terms of technology, the Iclod people fashioned tools from stone, bone, and wood. The development of polished stone tools represented a significant leap in efficiency and utility, facilitating agricultural activities, construction, and crafting.

Art and Symbolism

Art in the Iclod Culture manifested primarily through pottery and small sculptural pieces, often depicting human and animal figures. These artworks reveal a symbolic understanding of their world, possibly linked to spiritual beliefs or rituals. The symbols and motifs found in Iclod artifacts suggest a rich tapestry of mythology and religion, although the specific meanings remain largely speculative.

Interactions and Influence

The strategic location of the Iclod Culture along the Danube allowed for interactions with neighboring cultures. These exchanges, whether through trade or conflict, enabled the transfer of ideas, technologies, and goods. Such interactions contributed to the cultural dynamism of the Iclod people, allowing them to adapt and incorporate new influences into their own cultural framework.

Decline and Legacy

The decline of the Iclod Culture is not thoroughly understood, but it likely resulted from a combination of environmental changes, resource depletion, and the movement of other cultural groups into the region. Despite their eventual disappearance, the legacy of the Iclod Culture can be seen in subsequent Danubian cultures, as they contributed to the overall tapestry of human prehistory in Europe.

In conclusion, the Iclod Culture of the Danubian region exemplifies a complex, adaptive, and innovative society that played a significant role in the prehistoric narrative of Europe. Their advancements in agriculture, social organization, and art left an indelible mark on the cultural landscape of their time.

Related Samples
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
Ancient Genetic Admixture

Ancient genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (rom011) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles ancient populations from different geographic regions.

Neolithic Farmers 62%
European Hunter-Gatherers 22%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 13%
Ancient Asians 3%
Modern Genetic Admixture

Modern genetic admixture analysis compares the DNA profile of this individual (rom011) with present-day reference populations. These results show what percentage of the individual's genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different geographic regions.

These results complement the ancient ancestry components shown in the previous section, offering a different perspective on the individual's genetic profile by comparing it with modern reference populations rather than prehistoric ancestral groups.

Europe 89%
Southern European 84%
Italian 42.7%
Sardinian 20.6%
Iberian 18.7%
Balkan 1.9%
Northwestern European 5%
Northwestern European 5.1%
Asia 11%
Northern West Asian 8%
Cypriot 8.4%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 2%
Levantine 2.3%
Africa 0%
North African 0%
G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for the sample rom011 are as follows. You can analyze its admixture using G25 Studio.

rom011,0.10964476,0.15551842,0.01657614,-0.04427822,0.04643646,-0.01898344,-0.00622968,0.00343076,0.03520104,0.05799866,-0.00289332,0.01040644,-0.01852206,-0.01287312,-0.00880328,0.0041906,0.01193776,0.00067636,0.00026952,-0.00337402,4.5E-06,0.00248336,-0.00787078,-0.01474412,0.00414042
Analyze it in G25 Studio
Scientific Papers References
Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe
Authors:
Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A
Abstract:

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Save 85% coupon: CYBERWEEK85

Valid until April 30 2025