Fort Rock Cave: fiber work and revised chronology - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持，请使用打印功能。

Great Basin and Columbia Plateau Worlds: Lakes, Rivers, and Living Homelands
Great Basin and neighboring basin contexts (orientation only) · Source-reviewed profile

Fort Rock Cave: fiber work and revised chronology

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

Renewed work supported an early Holocene occupation but did not verify the older proposed human presence. The museum's sandal collection documents plant-fiber manufacture; an artifact style does not name every maker's language or identity.

Fiber technology and cave-reassessment context Early Holocene; directly dated sandals approximately 10,500–9,350 calibrated BP in the 2017 reassessment Sagebrush-bark sandals, volcanic ash, excavation records and renewed stratigraphic testing La Pine, Oregon, United States (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, cave-entrance, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, hunting, gathering, farming, fishing, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting, fishing or travel permission is implied.
概览

Caves, wetlands, households, rivers, and the evidence

Basin, plateau, lake, river, and neighboring connections

La Pine, Oregon, United States is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. Fiber work and short visits cannot be reconstructed as one Fort Rock state or ethnic community.

Political organization and community scale

Fiber work and short visits cannot be reconstructed as one Fort Rock state or ethnic community. The 2017 reassessment supported early Holocene use but did not confirm the proposed pre-10,500 calibrated BP occupation; oldest-footwear superlatives are not required facts.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Tools and food remains cannot identify every ancient language or speaker; living peoples' own histories are not dependent on archaeological classification. Events after 1800 CE and modern research, reconstruction and stewardship are dated separately from the main historical context.

Revised evidence Renewed work supported an early Holocene occupation but did not verify the older proposed human presence.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Fiber skills The museum's sandal collection documents plant-fiber manufacture; an artifact style does not name every maker's language or identity.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Public interpretation The museum places cave finds alongside living Tribal histories, rather than presenting ancient material as a vanished race.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Fiber manufacture

    Direct dating of sandals offers a different evidential basis from dates on nearby sediments.

    [S1]

  2. Cressman's investigations

    Sandals recovered beneath volcanic ash became important to regional chronology debates.

    [S1]

  3. Renewed testing

    Researchers assessed surviving deposits and the limits of older field records.

    [S1]

  4. Older claim not confirmed

    The reassessment retained uncertainty instead of treating an early proposed date as established.

    [S1]
文化和语言

Foodways, fiber work, farming, storage, and household labor

本简介中命名的语言

  • Tools and food remains cannot identify every ancient language or speaker; living peoples' own histories are not dependent on archaeological classification.

语言家庭: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Sagebrush-bark sandals, volcanic ash, excavation records and renewed stratigraphic testing.

Fiber work and short visits cannot be reconstructed as one Fort Rock state or ethnic community.

The 2017 reassessment supported early Holocene use but did not confirm the proposed pre-10,500 calibrated BP occupation; oldest-footwear superlatives are not required facts.

No artifact, rock-art, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。

阅读完整说明

继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    A Brief History of CTUIR

    Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute: public exhibition introduction

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  3. C3

    Expanding Paleoindian Diet Breadth: Paleoethnobotany of Connley Cave 5, Oregon, USA

    Katelyn N. McDonough, Jaime L. Kennedy, Richard L. Rosencrance, Justin A. Holcomb, Dennis L. Jenkins and Kathryn Puseman; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022

  4. C4

    Return to Fort Rock Cave: Assessing the Site's Potential to Contribute to Ongoing Debates About How and When Humans Colonized the Great Basin

    Thomas J. Connolly and colleagues; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2017

  5. C5

    Xwísten Community Profile

    Xwísten, Bridge River Indian Band · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2014 web edition

  6. C6

    Introduction Lesson: Syilx History

    Okanagan Nation Alliance, Syilx 101 · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    History and Archaeology

    Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  8. C8

    Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Typology and Chronology Across the Great Basin

    Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resource Series; Bryan Hockett and collaborators · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022-12-21 institutional record

  9. S1

    Return to Fort Rock Cave: Assessing the Site's Potential to Contribute to Ongoing Debates About How and When Humans Colonized the Great Basin

    Thomas J. Connolly and colleagues; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2017

  10. S2

    Great Basin Sandals

    University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  11. S3

    Oregon: Where Past is Present

    University of Oregon Museum of Natural and Cultural History · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

继续探索
Great Basin and neighboring basin contexts (orientation only) Baker Village: farming households and a modern interpretive footprint Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件 Great Basin and neighboring basin contexts (orientation only) Bonneville Estates: diverse foods and changing tool comparisons Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件 Great Basin and neighboring basin contexts (orientation only) Connley Caves: hearths, plant foods, and changing landscapes Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件
使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期