Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of Ash128
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Turkey in the Early Neolithic era

Ash128
8226 BCE - 7869 BCE
Female
Early Preceramic Neolithic Turkey
Turkey
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

Ash128

Date Range

8226 BCE - 7869 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

K1a4q

Cultural Period

Early Preceramic Neolithic Turkey

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Turkey
Locality Central Anatolia. Aksaray. Aşıklı Höyük
Coordinates 38.3482, 34.2303
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

Ash128 8226 BCE - 7869 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Preceramic Neolithic period in Turkey, particularly at sites like Aşıklı Höyük, represents a significant chapter in the development of human civilization in Anatolia. This era, dating back to approximately 10,000 to 8,000 BCE, marks the transition from hunter-gatherer societies to more settled, agrarian communities. Aşıklı Höyük, located in the central part of modern-day Turkey, provides a remarkable archaeological window into the complexities and innovations of early Neolithic life.

Settlement Patterns and Architecture

Aşıklı Höyük was characterized by its densely packed architecture and well-organized community layout, reflective of a shift towards more permanent settlements. The structures were primarily constructed using mud-brick materials, showcasing early experimentation with building techniques suited for more sedentary life. The rectangular and trapezoidal houses were often small, reflecting both the close-knit nature of these early communities and the practical considerations of available resources. Structures shared common walls, indicating a sophisticated understanding of architectural planning and a communal approach to space utilization.

Subsistence and Economy

The inhabitants of Aşıklı Höyük were among the pioneers of agriculture in the region. The economy was largely based on the cultivation of early domesticated plant species, including einkorn wheat and emmer, as well as legumes like lentils. The domestication and management of plants signify a crucial shift from dependence on wild resources to self-sustaining agriculture. Although primarily engaged in farming, these communities also continued to forage and hunt, particularly exploiting regional game such as aurochs and various birds.

Animal domestication was also emerging during this period, with evidence suggesting the early management of goats and possibly sheep. This nascent pastoralism provided not only a diversified diet but also materials such as wool and hides, contributing to the development of textile crafts and other industries.

Social Organization and Cultural Practices

The social structure of Aşıklı Höyük was likely complex and kin-based, with evidence of communal organization in food production and construction efforts. There is limited evidence of social stratification, suggesting either an egalitarian community or one with subtle social hierarchies not easily detected archaeologically. However, certain individuals or groups may have wielded temporary or situational influence, particularly in decision-making processes regarding agricultural cycles or communal projects.

Ritualism and symbolic behavior were important to Aşıklı Höyük residents. Ritual participation likely played a role in reinforcing social cohesion and shared identity. There is evidence of symbolic and religious activities, such as the placement of animal skulls within or near residential structures, which could indicate early forms of ancestor worship or totemic practices. Mortuary practices at Aşıklı Höyük provide clues about cultural beliefs, with burials found within the settlement, sometimes under the floors of houses, suggesting an intimate relationship between the living and the dead.

Technological and Artistic Achievements

The preceramic communities exhibited significant technological innovations, particularly in tool-making. The use of obsidian, when available, allowed for the production of sharp tools for cutting and butchering. The Aşıklı Höyük site is notable for its extensive use of tools and blades made from locally sourced obsidian, which also played a role in trade networks, linking Aşıklı Höyük to broader regional interactions.

Artistic expressions, though limited when compared to later periods, include the production of small figurines and the decoration of living surfaces with pigments derived from natural resources. These artifacts provide insights into early symbolic thought and aesthetic appreciation.

Interactions and Legacy

Aşıklı Höyük and other early Neolithic sites in Anatolia contributed significantly to the Neolithic Revolution, marking a major evolutionary step in human history. These communities played a pivotal role in spreading agricultural practices and domesticated species, influencing neighboring regions and laying the groundwork for increasingly complex societies.

In summary, the Early Preceramic Neolithic period at Aşıklı Höyük in Anatolia marks a transformative era characterized by the advent of agriculture, the construction of permanent settlements, and the genesis of complex social and cultural norms. This period laid the foundation for the future development of human civilization in the region and beyond, leaving a profound legacy that shaped the course of history.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes

Authors Yaka R, Mapelli I, Kaptan D
Abstract

The social organization of the first fully sedentary societies that emerged during the Neolithic period in Southwest Asia remains enigmatic,1 mainly because material culture studies provide limited insight into this issue. However, because Neolithic Anatolian communities often buried their dead beneath domestic buildings,2 household composition and social structure can be studied through these human remains. Here, we describe genetic relatedness among co-burials associated with domestic buildings in Neolithic Anatolia using 59 ancient genomes, including 22 new genomes from Aşıklı Höyük and Çatalhöyük. We infer pedigree relationships by simultaneously analyzing multiple types of information, including autosomal and X chromosome kinship coefficients, maternal markers, and radiocarbon dating. In two early Neolithic villages dating to the 9th and 8th millennia BCE, Aşıklı Höyük and Boncuklu, we discover that siblings and parent-offspring pairings were frequent within domestic structures, which provides the first direct indication of close genetic relationships among co-burials. In contrast, in the 7th millennium BCE sites of Çatalhöyük and Barcın, where we study subadults interred within and around houses, we find close genetic relatives to be rare. Hence, genetic relatedness may not have played a major role in the choice of burial location at these latter two sites, at least for subadults. This supports the hypothesis that in Çatalhöyük,3-5 and possibly in some other Neolithic communities, domestic structures may have served as burial location for social units incorporating biologically unrelated individuals. Our results underscore the diversity of kin structures in Neolithic communities during this important phase of sociocultural development.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27