M240 - A man buried in Nepal in the Iron Age era

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A man buried in Nepal in the Iron Age era
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Nepal in the Iron Age era

A man buried in Nepal during the Mebrak 2125BP

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

M240
450 BCE - 100 CE
Male
Nepal
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

M240

Date Range

450 BCE - 100 CE

Cultural Period

Mebrak 2125BP

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

M9a1a2

Y-DNA Haplogroup

O-M134

Social Role

Laborer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Nepal
Locality Mebrak Tomb. Nepal
Coordinates 28.7119, 83.8965
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

M240 450 BCE - 100 CE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Overview

“Mebrak 2125BP” is presented here as a dated phase within the Iron Age of Nepal, associated with the named Mebrak culture and the Mustang Complex. Although the time marker is single-point, archaeological interpretation generally relies on material assemblages rather than written records.

Region & Environment

This phase is tied to Nepal’s mountainous environments, where steep terrain and variable access to arable land shape settlement choices. Upland and valley ecosystems would have supported mixed subsistence, including farming where conditions permit and grazing in nearby higher zones.

Historical Context

In the later first millennium BCE, Iron Age communities across Himalayan South Asia continued to develop local technological and stylistic traditions. The Mebrak phase, as labeled, should be understood as a regional expression within a longer sequence rather than an isolated “event.”

Populations & Lifeways

Populations likely lived in small, community-based settlements or clustered farmsteads, with daily life organized around food production and household craft activities. Regular work would have included crop cultivation and processing, tending herds, and producing or maintaining tools and everyday vessels.

Archaeology & Material Culture

Archaeology for a named cultural phase typically emphasizes consistent patterns in:

  • Pottery forms and manufacturing traits
  • Iron objects used in routine tasks
  • Domestic debris and features that indicate cooking, storage, and craft processes In mountainous regions, preservation can vary, so assemblage-based correlations with broader Mustang-linked sequences are often used to place such phases in time.

Culture & Society

Cultural identity is reflected through material choices—especially vessel styles and the organization of daily domestic production. The Mustang Complex framing suggests relationships among communities across nearby upland corridors, where similar needs and contacts could produce overlapping material traditions.

Legacy & Transition

As later centuries unfolded, cultural patterns would have continued to shift through changes in ceramic styles, tool distributions, and settlement arrangements. The Mebrak phase contributes to building block-like reconstructions of how local Iron Age traditions evolved in the Himalayan context leading beyond the date provided.

Chapter V

Genetics

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing statistical similarity to modern reference populations from different regions. The excavation site records where this individual was found, not a fixed modern genetic identity.

Asia 92.9%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 58.6%
Tibetan 30.5%
Chinese 15.7%
Indonesian Khmer Thai Myanma 12.4%
Northern Asian 28.8%
Mongolian 28.8%
Japanese & Korean 3.9%
Japanese 3.9%
Central Asian, Northern Indian & Pakistani 1.5%
Indian 1.5%
Africa 5.9%
Northern East African 4.3%
Ethiopian 4.3%
North African 1.6%
North African 1.6%
Europe 1.2%
Southern European 1.2%
Iberian 1.2%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Nepal in the Iron Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity. Cross-region similarity can reflect shared ancestry, population movement, continuity, or later admixture.

1
Tu
3.1642
2
Tibetan Xunhua
3.3457
3
Tibetan Gangcha
3.9337
4
Bonan
4.0469
5
Tibetan Shigatse
4.2065
6
Tibetan Gannan
4.3437
7
Hui
4.3553
8
Yugur
4.4155
9
Baoan
4.4225
10
Tibetan Shannan
4.4529
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
C1 Chokhopani 2800BP 1200 BCE Chokhopani Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M240 Mebrak 2125BP 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M63 Mebrak 2125BP 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M344 Mebrak 2125BP 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S35 Samdzong 1500BP 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S10 Samdzong 1500BP 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S41 Samdzong 1500BP 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S40 Samdzong 1500BP 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M240 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M344 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S40 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
C1 1200 BCE Chokhopani Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M63 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S10 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S35 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
S41 200 CE Samdzong Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
M240 Mebrak 2125BP 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M63 Mebrak 2125BP 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
M344 Mebrak 2125BP 450 BCE Mebrak Tomb. Nepal, Nepal View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Long-term genetic stability and a high-altitude East Asian origin for the peoples of the high valleys of the Himalayan arc

Authors Jeong C, Ozga AT, Witonsky DB, Malmström H, Edlund H et al.
Abstract

The high-altitude transverse valleys [>3,000 m above sea level (masl)] of the Himalayan arc from Arunachal Pradesh to Ladahk were among the last habitable places permanently colonized by prehistoric humans due to the challenges of resource scarcity, cold stress, and hypoxia. The modern populations of these valleys, who share cultural and linguistic affinities with peoples found today on the Tibetan plateau, are commonly assumed to be the descendants of the earliest inhabitants of the Himalayan arc. However, this assumption has been challenged by archaeological and osteological evidence suggesting that these valleys may have been originally populated from areas other than the Tibetan plateau, including those at low elevation. To investigate the peopling and early population history of this dynamic high-altitude contact zone, we sequenced the genomes (0.04×-7.25×, mean 2.16×) and mitochondrial genomes (20.8×-1,311.0×, mean 482.1×) of eight individuals dating to three periods with distinct material culture in the Annapurna Conservation Area (ACA) of Nepal, spanning 3,150-1,250 y before present (yBP). We demonstrate that the region is characterized by long-term stability of the population genetic make-up despite marked changes in material culture. The ancient genomes, uniparental haplotypes, and high-altitude adaptive alleles suggest a high-altitude East Asian origin for prehistoric Himalayan populations.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

M240,0.01005226,-0.40742986,0.00581808,-0.0388898,0.0134555,0.00919334,0.005246,0.00879934,0.00192908,0.00948196,-0.05159544,-0.00609064,0.0079138,-0.00196956,-0.00651638,-0.00457,0.00232812,0.00034626,-0.00215648,0.00187358,0.00961762,0.00767292,0.00475614,-0.00056928,0.01732847
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 35% off Expires Aug 13