Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO117
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Mesolithic era

NEO117
6062 BCE - 5802 BCE
Male
Transbaikal Mesolithic Culture
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO117

Date Range

6062 BCE - 5802 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

C4a1a+195

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N-L666

Cultural Period

Transbaikal Mesolithic Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Zhindo (Zabaykalsky Krai, Krasnochikoysky District)
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO117 6062 BCE - 5802 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Transbaikal Mesolithic Culture represents a fascinating chapter in the prehistoric narrative of early Siberian inhabitants. This period, which forms part of the broader Mesolithic era (circa 10,000 to 5,000 BCE), marks a transitional phase following the Paleolithic and preceding the Neolithic, characterized by remarkable adaptations to postglacial environments and the refinement of stone tool technology.

Environmental Context

The Transbaikal region, situated in southeastern Siberia, encompasses diverse landscapes including vast taigas, mountainous terrains, and the basins of major water bodies like Lake Baikal. During the Mesolithic, the climate was undergoing a gradual warming trend following the Last Glacial Maximum. This led to the expansion of deciduous forests and mixed woodlands, creating rich habitats for a variety of flora and fauna. The area was teeming with wildlife such as elk, deer, and smaller mammals, as well as abundant fish stocks in rivers and lakes, which played a crucial role in the subsistence strategies of the Mesolithic communities.

Technological Innovations

One of the hallmark features of the Transbaikal Mesolithic Culture was the sophistication in microlithic technology. The people of this era crafted small, finely worked stone tools that were often used as composite elements in hunting gear. These microliths included geometric shapes such as triangles and crescents, which were embedded in wooden or bone shafts to create effective weapons like arrows and harpoons, optimized for exploiting terrestrial and aquatic resources.

Additionally, there is evidence of enhanced techniques in bone and antler tool production. Implements such as needles, awls, and fishhooks demonstrate advanced craftsmanship and suggest a keen understanding of available materials and their properties.

Subsistence and Lifestyle

The Mesolithic communities of Transbaikal were primarily hunter-gatherers, relying on a mixed subsistence economy. Seasonal movement patterns were likely employed to exploit various resources throughout the year. During warmer months, groups might have camped near lakes and rivers to fish and gather plant resources, while in winter, they possibly moved to more sheltered areas for hunting terrestrial animals.

Social organization during this period likely revolved around small, kin-based bands that formed temporary encampments. These groups would have been nimble and adaptive, with social structures flexible enough to accommodate the shifting availability of resources.

Art and Symbolism

Artistic expressions, as evidenced by findings from the Transbaikal region and similar Mesolithic sites, included engravings on bone, antler, and occasionally rock surfaces. Though less abundant than in the preceding Paleolithic era, these artworks hint at a complex symbolic life. Patterns and motifs, possibly imbued with spiritual or cultural significance, demonstrate the early Siberians' connection to their environment and might have played a role in rituals or identity formation.

Interaction and Networks

The Transbaikal Mesolithic populations, while dispersed across a large and challenging landscape, were not isolated. Archaeological evidence suggests some degree of interaction with neighboring groups, whether through trade or the exchange of ideas. This can be inferred from similarities in tool technologies and shared artistic motifs across different sites in Siberia.

Conclusion

The Transbaikal Mesolithic Culture reflects a period of significant adaptation and innovation as humans navigated a changing world. Their legacy, captured in stone tools, artistic remnants, and subsistence strategies, provides crucial insights into the resilience and ingenuity of early Siberian populations. Understanding this culture not only enriches our knowledge of prehistoric human development but also underscores the intimate relationship between humans and their environments during pivotal moments in history.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26