Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO538
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Iron Age era

NEO538
986 BCE - 813 BCE
Male
Early Iron Age Minino Culture
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO538

Date Range

986 BCE - 813 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U5a1d2b

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N-SK1485

Cultural Period

Early Iron Age Minino Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Minino 1 (Vologda Oblast, Vologda District, Minino Village)
Coordinates 59.4200, 39.3000
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO538 986 BCE - 813 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Iron Age Minino Culture is an intriguing facet of the broader tapestry of Slavic prehistory, reflecting the social, technological, and cultural evolution of early Slavic groups. Emerging during the Early Iron Age (approximately 1000 BC to 300 AD), the Minino Culture provides valuable insights into the transitional period marking the end of the Bronze Age and the beginning of more advanced metallurgical and societal practices in Eastern Europe.

Geographic Distribution

Centered primarily in the forest-steppe regions of Eastern Europe, the Minino Culture occupied territories that are part of present-day Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. This geographical location exposed the Minino people to a variety of influences, including interactions with neighboring cultures like the Scythians, Balts, and Finno-Ugric groups. The natural environment of vast forests and rich river systems provided essential resources for settlement, agriculture, and trade.

Archaeological Features

Settlements and Structures: Minino settlements typically consisted of small, fortified villages located near rivers or elevated positions that offered natural defenses. The dwellings were constructed primarily from wood and wattle-and-daub materials, featuring semi-subterranean designs that provided insulation against harsh winters. Archaeological evidence suggests that these communities were organized around kinship groups, with a communal approach to agriculture and resource management.

Burial Practices: Burial sites offer a window into the spiritual and social life of the Minino Culture. They practiced both inhumation and cremation, with burial mounds and flat graves uncovered by archaeologists. Grave goods, such as pottery, iron tools, personal ornaments, and occasionally weapons, indicate social stratification and the significance of status and familial lineage.

Technological and Economic Aspects

Metallurgy and Tool-Making: The Minino Culture is characterized by its transition from bronze to iron metallurgy. Iron tools and weapons, including axes, knives, and sickles, became increasingly prevalent, reflecting advancements in metalworking skills. This technological shift contributed to more efficient agricultural practices, facilitating surplus production and population growth.

Agriculture and Subsistence: Agriculture played a central role in the Minino economy, with evidence of cereal cultivation, including wheat, barley, and millet. Animal husbandry complemented plant cultivation, with domesticated species such as cattle, sheep, and pigs providing meat, milk, and raw materials for textiles and tools. Hunting and fishing also remained vital, supported by the wide variety of fauna in the surrounding forests and waterways.

Cultural and Social Dynamics

Art and Craftsmanship: Artistic expression within the Minino Culture is evident in their pottery, which displays intricate geometric designs and motifs. Clay vessels were utilitarian and ceremonial, with various shapes and sizes indicating cultural significance. Textile production, although less well-documented due to the perishable nature of materials, likely involved weaving and dyeing techniques passed down through generations.

Trade and External Interactions: The geographical position of the Minino Culture facilitated trade interactions with both neighboring and distant regions. Evidence of foreign goods, such as amber, glass beads, and exotic metals, suggests an extensive network of trade routes. These interactions with other cultures not only influenced the economy but also introduced new cultural and technological ideas, contributing to the dynamic development of the Minino people.

Religious and Spiritual Beliefs: The spiritual life of the Minino Culture was deeply intertwined with their environmental context. Nature worship and the veneration of natural forces and deities were likely integral to their belief system. Ritual activities and the placement of certain grave goods imply a belief in an afterlife, where deceased ancestors played a role in the well-being of the living community.

Conclusion

The Early Iron Age Minino Culture stands as a testament to the resilience and adaptability of early Slavic groups during a period of significant transformation. By examining their archaeological legacy, one gains an appreciation for how the Minino people navigated the challenges and opportunities of their era—innovating in technology, expanding trade networks, and fostering complex social and spiritual systems. This culture forms a pivotal chapter in the broader narrative of Slavic history, underscoring the region's rich and multifaceted heritage.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26