跳转到主内容
mtDNA · 母亲 lineage

B4D1

mtDNA Haplogroup B4D1

一个家族分支的参考简介 。 共享haplogroups 无法建立家庭关系或文化认同 。

参考简介

部门背景

mtDNA 谱系分支 B4D1 的历史背景

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup B4D1'2'3 is an intermediate subclade within the B4 branch of macro-haplogroup B, a lineage that expanded across East Asia, Island Southeast Asia, and into Oceania during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. As an internal node connecting parent and child lineages, B4D1'2'3 most plausibly arose in Island Southeast Asia during the early-to-mid Holocene (order-of-magnitude estimate ~10 kya), but precise dating is uncertain and depends on improved full mitogenome sampling and molecular-clock calibration. Its position in the phylogeny indicates that it represents regional diversification of B4-derived maternal lineages after the initial Pleistocene dispersals of haplogroup B.

Subclades (if applicable)

B4D1'2'3 serves as an internal branch that leads to more terminal subclades (for example, named child clades within Phylotree when defined by diagnostic mutations). Because it is an intermediate node, detailed characterization requires complete mitogenomes from candidate populations to identify the defining mutations and to separate downstream branches (e.g., B4D1, B4D2, B4D3 or similarly named subclades when established). Current evidence from related B4 sublineages suggests a mixture of relatively deep and more recent splits in the region, with some daughter branches expanding during Austronesian movements and others representing older island/coastal founder events.

Geographical Distribution

Based on the phylogenetic position within haplogroup B4 and the known geography of related B4 subclades, B4D1'2'3 is most likely to occur at moderate frequency in Island Southeast Asia (Taiwan, the Philippines, eastern Indonesia) with lower-frequency occurrences in Near Oceania and coastal East Asia. The distribution pattern inferred from related B4 lineages points to island and coastal populations, especially among groups associated with Austronesian-speaking communities and adjacent non-Austronesian populations that experienced gene flow in the Holocene. However, published datasets do not yet provide comprehensive coverage for B4D1'2'3 specifically, so reported occurrences remain provisional.

Historical and Cultural Significance

If confirmed in modern and ancient samples, B4D1'2'3 would be informative for reconstructing Holocene coastal dispersals, island colonization, and the early stages of Austronesian expansion. Some B4 subclades are strongly associated with the Neolithic and later Austronesian-driven settlement of Island Southeast Asia and Remote Oceania (e.g., the Lapita horizon). An intermediate clade like B4D1'2'3 could record either (a) pre-Austronesian island/coastal maternal lineages that were assimilated into expanding groups, or (b) lineages that diversified during Austronesian movements themselves. Resolving this requires ancient DNA from archaeological contexts (Neolithic coastal sites, early Austronesian settlements, and Lapita-associated burials) combined with dense modern mitogenome sampling.

Conclusion

B4D1'2'3 is best treated as a geographically focused, Holocene-era intermediate node within B4 that likely originated in Island Southeast Asia and contributed to regional maternal diversity. Current knowledge is provisional: the clade's precise age, internal structure, and population history depend on additional full mitogenome sequencing across Taiwan, the Philippines, eastern Indonesia, and Near Oceania. Future studies combining high-resolution mtDNA phylogenetics with archaeology and linguistics will clarify whether this node marks pre-Austronesian substrate, an Austronesian-associated diversification, or a mixture of both processes.

Note on uncertainty: the approximate origin time and geographic inferences above are based on the phylogenetic position within B4 and on patterns observed in better-characterized B4 subclades; they should be updated as more complete-sequence data become available.

关键点

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
参考简介

树形关系( N)

phylgenetic 上下文和子拼写

进化路径

沿已记录的上级分支追溯至 B4D1。年代为估计值,可能随参考数据更新而调整。

步骤 单倍群 年龄估计 考古时代 时间流逝 直系后裔 被测试的现代后裔 古代连接
1 B4D1 当前 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 years 1 3 0
2 B4D1'2'3 - - - 2 9 0
3 B4D ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 years 1 9 6
4 B4B'D'E'J - - - 3 997 0
5 B4 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 years 4 1,122 7
6 B4'5 ~40,000 years ago Paleolithic 40,000 years 2 1,432 0
7 RA - - - 3 1,452 0
8 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 years 17 22,830 57
9 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
10 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 years 16 26,150 13
11 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 years 7 30,162 6
12 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
13 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
14 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
15 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
16 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
17 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 years 2 32,236 5

Siblings (1)

来自同一父分支的分支( oplogroup)

参考简介

哪里是这个世界

地理分布和现代存在

记录来源

Island Southeast Asia

现代发行

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup B4D1'2'3 is found include:

  1. Indigenous Taiwanese Austronesian-speaking groups (e.g., Atayal, Amis)
  2. Various populations in the Philippines (coastal and island groups)
  3. Eastern Indonesian island populations (Sulawesi, Maluku, Nusa Tenggara)
  4. Bornean island populations (coastal Dayak and island communities)
  5. Near Oceanian groups at low frequency (e.g., parts of Solomon Islands, Bismarck Archipelago)
  6. Coastal East Asian samples at sporadic low frequency (southern China / Taiwan straits)
  7. Modern Austronesian diaspora populations (reflecting recent movements)
  8. Ancient remains from Holocene coastal/insular archaeological contexts (pending further sampling)
历史背景

分枝穿越时间

大致历史时间范围内的估计形成情况:周期标志提供了背景,并不意味着与特定文化的联系。

  1. ~10k 年前

    新石器革命

    农业开始,定居社区形成

  2. ~10k 年前

    Haplogroup B4D1

    此 mtDNA 分支的形成时间为推定值,日期和地点仅作参考。

    这个分支
  3. ~5k 年前

    青铜时代

    金属加工、书写和早期文明

  4. ~3k 年前

    铁器时代

    铁工具,扩大贸易网络

  5. ~2.5k 年前

    古典时代

    希腊和罗马文明蓬勃发展

  6. 现

    现日

    现代时代

参考简介

考古学背景

已记录的 mtDNA 分支 B4D1 考古关联

有记录的协会

这些标签描述与 B4D1 相关的参考样本所处的考古背景。仅凭这种关联,无法判断所有携带者都属于某种文化或沿同一路线迁徙。

Boisman Chinese Bronze-Iron Chinese Paleolithic Late Medieval Mongolian Longsangquduo Culture Magyar Elite Culture Tianyuan Culture Ukraine_LateMedieval_Nogai Umungobi Medieval Yellow River Culture
文化任务基于古代DNA样本的考古背景,可能代表特定时期的区域协会.
参考简介

样本目录

单倍群 B4D1 的直接携带者 5 名

5 显示 ^ 5 匹配样本

Portraits是AI生成的插图,样本标签和加入ID识别参考记录.

纵向 样本 国家 大纪元 日期 文化 mtDNA 匹配
AI生成的示例性肖像 Elite Conqueror individual, Hajdú-Bihar County. Sárrétudvari-Poroshalom, Hungary (960-1,000 CE)
Sample ID: SP-10
Hungary Conqueror Elite Hungary 950-1000 CE Magyar Elite Culture B4d1 Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Elite individual, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County. Karos-3, Hungary (960-1,000 CE)
Sample ID: K3-6
Hungary Conqueror Elite Hungary 950-1000 CE Magyar Elite Culture B4d1 Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Elite individual, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County. Karos-3, Hungary (960-1,000 CE)
Sample ID: K3-13
Hungary Conqueror Elite Hungary 950-1000 CE Magyar Elite Culture B4d1 Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, Henan province. Yingyang county. Wanggou village. Wanggou site, China (3,550-3,050 BCE)
Sample ID: WGM94
China Middle Neolithic Yellow River, China 3550 BCE - 3050 BCE Yellow River Culture B4d1 Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 China Mn individual, Henan province. Yingyang county. Wanggou village. Wanggou site, China (3,550-3,050 BCE)
Sample ID: WGM94
China Middle Neolithic China 3550 BCE - 3050 BCE B4d1 Direct
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

古代世系证据地图

跟随母舰飞向这个分支 探索古代载体的发现地点

正在装入古老的观测...

标记是考古发现地点。一个破碎的连接器是连续分支之间一种不确定的、拟议中的地理过渡,辅以多个日期的观察;它不是一个准确的旅行路线、出生地或直接血统的证明。父系样本可能属于其他后代分支。在证据不足的地方,差距依然存在。样本日期与随机群形成日期不同。

参考简介

载体分布图

5 个古代 DNA 样本的地理分布,涵盖 B4D1 及其下游分支的携带者

直接承运人
时间段过滤器
所有时间段
显示全部样本
参考简介

时间分布

载体在考古时期的分布

参考简介

地理分布

按有记录的抽样国家计算,反映的是现有的参考选择,而不是人口频率。

参考简介

国家 × 大纪元发行

比较各国和考古时期记录的样本数量。选择一个人口密集的细胞来检查样本。

数据

数据证明( P)

来源信息和数据质量

上次更新 2026-06-14
信心分数 50/100
覆盖范围 Low

数据来源

分类、估计日期和地理背景反映了所记录的参考数据,随着证据的修订而可能发生变化,样本覆盖范围不均匀;所记录的地点和考古协会没有确定个人出身或文化特征。