跳转到主内容
mtDNA · 母亲 lineage

U2E2A1A1

mtDNA Haplogroup U2E2A1A1

一个家族分支的参考简介 。 共享haplogroups 无法建立家庭关系或文化认同 。

参考简介

部门背景

mtDNA 谱系分支 U2E2A1A1 的历史背景

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup U2E2A1A1 is a downstream subclade of U2E2A1A, itself part of the broader U2E2/U2 family of maternal lineages. Given the phylogenetic position of U2E2A1A1 beneath U2E2A1A and the available coalescent estimates for the parent clade, U2E2A1A1 most likely arose in the Holocene on the Indian subcontinent roughly during the mid-to-late Holocene (on the order of a few thousand years ago). Its emergence is consistent with localized diversification of U2 sublineages in South Asia following the Last Glacial Maximum and the Neolithic-to-Bronze Age transitions in the region.

Because the clade is comparatively deep within a regional sub-tree (U2E2A1A → U2E2A1A1), the lineage reflects a pattern of regional maternal differentiation rather than a broad, continent-spanning expansion. The observed phylogeographic pattern—higher frequencies among indigenous caste and tribal groups with scattered detections outside South Asia—supports a model of local origin with limited drift-mediated dispersal to adjacent regions.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal branch in published classification (U2E2A1A1), this haplogroup currently has few well-characterized downstream subclades reported in the literature. Increased sequencing of complete mitochondrial genomes from South Asian and adjacent populations may reveal additional substructure beneath U2E2A1A1; at present it is treated as a localized terminal subclade of U2E2A1A. The relative paucity of detected downstream diversity is consistent with either a recent origin or undersampling of populations where it is concentrated.

Geographical Distribution

U2E2A1A1 shows a clear South Asian focus. Highest frequencies and diversity are reported from various Indian caste and tribal groups, where lineage persistence and local diversification have been most pronounced. Outside India, the clade has been documented at low frequencies in Pakistan (including Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashtun and Baloch samples), in parts of Central Asia (Kazakh, Uzbek, Tajik and related populations) and more sporadically on the Iranian Plateau and adjacent Near Eastern locales. Rare and very low-frequency detections have been reported in some European and North African surveys; these are generally interpreted as the result of historical gene flow or recent migration rather than representing centers of origin.

Two archaeological (ancient DNA) samples associated with Holocene contexts have been reported in available databases for the broader U2E2A1A lineage and/or closely related subclades, indicating that this maternal branch has been present in the region for several millennia.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because U2E2A1A1 is concentrated among indigenous South Asian groups, it is valuable for reconstructing maternal microhistory within the subcontinent: population continuity, founder events, and localized demographic processes (e.g., endogamy among caste and tribal communities). The timing and distribution are compatible with presence in Bronze Age contexts in South Asia (including the later phases of the Indus Valley/Harappan cultural horizon) and persistence through subsequent cultural transitions into the Iron Age and historic periods. Its low-frequency presence in Pakistan, Central Asia and westward likely reflects post-origin dispersal via trade, migration or population movement rather than a primary role in long-distance Neolithic expansions.

U2-derived lineages in South Asia are often contrasted with the more widespread West Eurasian H and U haplogroups and the predominantly South Asian M lineages; the mixture of these signals in modern populations helps reconstruct past contacts between South Asia and neighboring regions.

Conclusion

U2E2A1A1 is best interpreted as a relatively localized Holocene maternal lineage that diversified on the Indian subcontinent and persists at moderate frequencies among indigenous caste and tribal populations, with lower-frequency occurrences in adjacent regions. Additional whole-mitochondrial sequencing from under-sampled South Asian and neighboring populations will help resolve its internal structure and refine age and migration models for this clade.

关键点

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
参考简介

树形关系( N)

phylgenetic 上下文和子拼写

进化路径

沿已记录的上级分支追溯至 U2E2A1A1。年代为估计值,可能随参考数据更新而调整。

步骤 单倍群 年龄估计 考古时代 时间流逝 直系后裔 被测试的现代后裔 古代连接
1 U2E2A1A1 当前 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 years 0 0 0
2 U2E2A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 years 2 9 18
3 U2E2A1 ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 years 3 30 0
4 U2E2A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 years 1 30 19
5 U2E2 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 years 1 41 0
6 U2EA - - - 3 158 0
7 U2E ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 years 1 236 45
8 U2A ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 years 4 756 6
9 U2 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 years 3 829 37
10 U2'3'4'7'8'9 - - - 5 3,500 0
11 U ~46,000 years ago Paleolithic 46,000 years 5 5,557 110
12 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 years 17 22,830 57
13 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
14 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 years 16 26,150 13
15 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 years 7 30,162 6
16 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
17 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
18 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
19 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
20 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
21 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 years 2 32,236 5

Subclades (0)

终端分支 -没有记录的子密钥

Siblings (1)

来自同一父分支的分支( oplogroup)

参考简介

哪里是这个世界

地理分布和现代存在

记录来源

South Asia

现代发行

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup U2E2A1A1 is found include:

  1. Various Indian caste and tribal groups (India)
  2. Pakistani populations (Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashtun, Baloch groups)
  3. Central Asian populations (Kazakh, Uzbek, Tajik and related groups)
  4. Near Eastern populations on the Iranian Plateau and adjacent areas
  5. European populations at very low frequency (sporadic detections in Eastern/Central Europe)
  6. North African groups at low frequency (reported in some Berber-adjacent samples)
  7. Indigenous northern European groups in rare cases (reported in limited studies)
  8. Ancient Holocene archaeological samples from South Asia and adjacent West Asian contexts (sporadic ancient DNA detections)
历史背景

分枝穿越时间

大致历史时间范围内的估计形成情况:周期标志提供了背景,并不意味着与特定文化的联系。

  1. ~10k 年前

    新石器革命

    农业开始,定居社区形成

  2. ~5k 年前

    青铜时代

    金属加工、书写和早期文明

  3. ~4.5k 年前

    Haplogroup U2E2A1A1

    此 mtDNA 分支的形成时间为推定值,日期和地点仅作参考。

    这个分支
  4. ~3k 年前

    铁器时代

    铁工具,扩大贸易网络

  5. ~2.5k 年前

    古典时代

    希腊和罗马文明蓬勃发展

  6. 现

    现日

    现代时代

参考简介

考古学背景

已记录的 mtDNA 分支 U2E2A1A1 考古关联

有记录的协会

这些标签描述与 U2E2A1A1 相关的参考样本所处的考古背景。仅凭这种关联,无法判断所有携带者都属于某种文化或沿同一路线迁徙。

Anglo-Saxon Bulgarian Medieval East Yorkshire Mixed TRB-CWC Poznań Środka Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_N_Bolshemys Russia_Eneolithic_Caucasus Russia_Saratov_Eneolithic_Khvalynsk Russia_StavropolKrai_Eneolithic Saxon Dunum Unetice Culture Viking
文化任务基于古代DNA样本的考古背景,可能代表特定时期的区域协会.
参考简介

样本目录

单倍群 U2E2A1A1 的直接携带者 2 名

2 显示 ^ 2 匹配样本

Portraits是AI生成的插图,样本标签和加入ID识别参考记录.

纵向 样本 国家 大纪元 日期 文化 mtDNA 匹配
AI生成的示例性肖像 Norse individual, England. Oxford. St John's College Oxford, United Kingdom (880-1,000 CE)
Sample ID: VK163
United Kingdom England Viking 880 CE - 1000 CE Viking U2e2a1a1 Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Viking individual, England. Oxford. St John's College Oxford, United Kingdom (880-1,000 CE)
Sample ID: VK163
United Kingdom The Viking Age 880 CE - 1000 CE U2e2a1a1 Direct
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

古代世系证据地图

跟随母舰飞向这个分支 探索古代载体的发现地点

正在装入古老的观测...

标记是考古发现地点。一个破碎的连接器是连续分支之间一种不确定的、拟议中的地理过渡,辅以多个日期的观察;它不是一个准确的旅行路线、出生地或直接血统的证明。父系样本可能属于其他后代分支。在证据不足的地方,差距依然存在。样本日期与随机群形成日期不同。

参考简介

载体分布图

2 个古代 DNA 样本的地理分布,涵盖 U2E2A1A1 及其下游分支的携带者

直接承运人
时间段过滤器
所有时间段
显示全部样本
参考简介

时间分布

载体在考古时期的分布

参考简介

地理分布

按有记录的抽样国家计算,反映的是现有的参考选择,而不是人口频率。

参考简介

国家 × 大纪元发行

比较各国和考古时期记录的样本数量。选择一个人口密集的细胞来检查样本。

数据

数据证明( P)

来源信息和数据质量

上次更新 2026-02-16
信心分数 50/100
覆盖范围 Low

数据来源

分类、估计日期和地理背景反映了所记录的参考数据,随着证据的修订而可能发生变化,样本覆盖范围不均匀;所记录的地点和考古协会没有确定个人出身或文化特征。