San Lorenzo and Formative Gulf Coast communities - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持，请使用打印功能。

Deep History of the Americas: Communities, Cities, and Living Heritage
Lower Coatzacoalcos basin and southern Gulf Coast lowlands · Source-reviewed profile

San Lorenzo and Formative Gulf Coast communities

San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán

Landscape modification, residential terraces, stone sculpture, water and transport routes, subsistence evidence, and surrounding settlements show a major Early Formative center embedded in tropical lowland communities.

Formative-period settlement, landscape, craft, and regional political context Major development approximately 1500-850 BCE, with later occupations Settlement archaeology, stratigraphy, radiocarbon dating, landscape modification, sculpture, domestic terraces, plant evidence, regional survey, and material sourcing San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán archaeological zone in Veracruz; a major regional center, not an ethnic capital for every community labeled Olmec
概览

Evidence, landscapes, community scale, political organization, and connections

Regional landscapes, movement, exchange, and historical geography

Navigable rivers, floodplains, wetlands, tropical resources, farms, terraces, and routes to volcanic stone sources shaped settlement and regional connections.

Political organization and community scale

Large-scale landscape work, sculpture, production, and regional relationships suggest concentrated authority and unequal access, but institutional form and titles are reconstructed rather than directly recorded.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

INAH and local communities steward the archaeological zone. Ancient Gulf Coast evidence does not determine modern Indigenous identity, recognition, cultural ownership, ancestry, or descent.

Major florescence approximately 1200-900 BCE

A site chronology, not the lifespan of one homogeneous Olmec nation.

Current INAH interpretation [S1]
Landscape work terraces and reshaped plateau

Construction records organized labor but does not disclose exact political offices.

Current research [S1] [S3]
Label Olmec

A scholarly archaeological and art-historical category whose relation to self-identity and language is unresolved.

Reviewed 2026 [S2] [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Early settlement phases

    Communities expanded occupation, subsistence, and landscape use during phases identified archaeologically as Ojochi and Bajío.

    [S1] [S2]

  2. Monumental and population growth

    Terraces, sculpture, production, and regional influence developed alongside maize cultivation and other subsistence practices.

    [S1] [S2] [S3]

  3. Major reorganization

    Population and activity declined amid debated conflict, environmental, health, and political factors; simple invasion or disappearance stories are unsupported.

    [S1] [S3]

  4. Archaeological research and public stewardship

    Excavation, conservation, museum work, and INAH protection continue to revise the site's history.

    [S1] [S2]
文化和语言

Households, landscapes, subsistence, labor, language, belief, craft, exchange, and mobility

本简介中命名的语言

  • No deciphered written language corpus securely identifies every resident
  • Later regional languages cannot be projected automatically backward

语言家庭: Unresolved; archaeological style cannot determine one spoken language or ethnicity

Residents reshaped a natural plateau with enormous quantities of fill and residential terraces.

Volcanic stone moved from the Tuxtla region for monuments and other works.

Population and abandonment figures remain archaeological estimates rather than censuses.

Monuments, elite burials, inscriptions, imported objects, and colonial records are often more visible than households, women, children, farmers, fishers, craftspeople, migrants, captives, enslaved or coerced people, and rural communities. Evidence gaps must not be filled with primitive, vanished-race, empty-continent, foreign-builder, lost-civilization, or one-way-civilization narratives.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。

阅读完整说明

继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous Nations and community heritage organizations, national and regional heritage authorities, museums working through accountable stewardship, UNESCO records, and peer-reviewed archaeological projects. Register oral traditions, Indigenous knowledge, inscriptions, and colonial testimony with date, genre, language, audience, and viewpoint. Do not register Wikipedia or add artifact, sacred-site, burial, rock-art, or human-remains imagery without per-file licensing, attribution, consultation, and ethical review.

  1. C1

    Identifying Cultural Affiliation

    National Park Service, Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Program · Repatriation and consultation guidance · Current federal guidance

  2. C2

    Shared Stewardship and Ethical Returns

    Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian · Indigenous museum stewardship resource · Current institutional resource

  3. C3

    Monumental Earthworks of Poverty Point

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 2014; current record

  4. C4

    Tikal National Park

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 1979; current record

  5. C5

    Sacred City of Caral-Supe

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 2009; current record

  6. C6

    Qhapaq Ñan, Andean Road System

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage and community-stewardship record · 2014; current record

  7. C7

    Hopewell Ceremonial Earthworks

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International heritage record · 2023; current record

  8. C8

    Fossilized Footprints

    White Sands National Park, National Park Service · Federal archaeological and paleontological resource · Current park research resource

  9. C9

    About the National Institute of Anthropology and History

    Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia · National archaeology and heritage authority · Current institutional resource

  10. C10

    Research at the National Museum of the American Indian

    Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian · Community-centered museum research resource · Current institutional resource

  11. S1

    Zona Arqueológica de San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan

    Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia · National archaeology authority resource · Updated 2025

  12. S2

    San Lorenzo archaeological context

    Lugares INAH · National museum and site resource · Current institutional resource

  13. S3

    Arqueología journal research resources

    Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia · National peer-reviewed archaeology journal · Current journal archive

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: August 5, 2026

可选的DNA报告

Explore the separate paid DNA report for a personal genetic-similarity comparison designed for customers who want analysis beyond this educational atlas.

The Historical Atlas is free and uses no DNA or genetic data. The paid report is a separate genetic-similarity product, and this atlas cannot establish tribal affiliation, ethnicity, nationality, identity, ancestry, descent, recognition, sovereignty, or community membership.
View the report
继续探索
American Bottom and central Mississippi River valley Cahokia and Mississippian urban networks Cahokia Mounds; ancient self-name unknown 读取配置文件 Supe Valley and north-central Peruvian coast Caral-Supe and early Andean urbanism Ciudad Sagrada de Caral-Supe 读取配置文件 San Juan Basin and Four Corners region Chaco Canyon and ancestral Pueblo worlds Chaco Canyon; multiple Pueblo and Diné place names 读取配置文件
使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期