Lazica/Egrisi and Nokalakevi - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Deep History of the Caucasus: Highlands, Lowlands, and Connected Worlds
Western Georgia, Colchian lowlands, and eastern Black Sea hinterland · Source-reviewed profile

Lazica/Egrisi and Nokalakevi

Egrisi / ეგრისი; Nokalakevi / ნოქალაქევი

Fortifications, churches, palatial and domestic buildings, baths, ceramics, coins, burials, and surrounding settlement evidence illuminate a western Georgian kingdom within Roman-Sasanian competition and local networks.

Late-antique kingdom, fortified city, household, religious, military, and imperial-encounter context Approximately fourth-seventh centuries CE for principal Lazica/Egrisi phases, within a longer site sequence Fortifications, urban excavation, domestic and elite architecture, churches, baths, ceramics, coins, burials, landscape survey, and attributed Byzantine, Persian, and Georgian texts Nokalakevi archaeological site; a major fortified center and probable Archaeopolis, not the center of every Lazican community or a modern boundary
概览

Evidence, landscapes, community scale, political organization, and connections

Mountain, river, Black Sea, Caspian, Anatolian, Iranian, and steppe connections

Rivers, fertile lowlands, forests, roads, mountain approaches, Black Sea connections, forts, farms, and churches supported regional power and everyday life.

Political organization and community scale

Kings, courts, local elites, fortified centers, churches, rural communities, soldiers, and Roman and Sasanian interests shaped changing authority and obligations.

Late-antique transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Georgian institutions and international partners steward Nokalakevi. Lazica/Egrisi history cannot adjudicate present borders, ethnic identity, or personal ancestry.

Probable historical identification Archaeopolis

The identification is strong but should remain an evidence-based attribution rather than a timeless name.

Current research [S1] [S2]
Political setting Lazica/Egrisi amid Roman-Sasanian competition

Local rulers and communities had agency within imperial conflict.

Sixth-century context [S1] [S3]
Representativeness one fortified center, not the entire kingdom

Rural, coastal, and mountain communities require additional evidence.

Reviewed 2026 [S2] [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Fortified urban center develops

    Walls, buildings, churches, households, and routes supported local and royal institutions in western Georgia.

  2. Lazic War reshapes the region

    Eastern Roman and Sasanian forces competed through alliances, siege, movement, coercion, and local political choices.

  3. Religious and political institutions transform

    Churches, fortifications, settlement, and imperial relations changed unevenly without simple population replacement.

  4. Anglo-Georgian project expands research

    Stratigraphic excavation, survey, conservation, training, and publication refined the site's long chronology.

文化和语言

Households, subsistence, labor, language, belief, craft, exchange, and mobility

本简介中命名的语言

  • Kartvelian languages in regional historical context
  • Greek in eastern Roman institutional and ecclesiastical use
  • Middle Persian and other languages in imperial encounters

语言家庭: Kartvelian language history is relevant, but texts and material culture cannot assign every subject one identity

Long-running fieldwork integrates city, household, burial, and landscape evidence.

Fortifications reveal labor and conflict but not a complete social history.

The Lazic War must be read through partisan imperial authors and local archaeology.

Elite graves, fortresses, royal inscriptions, churches, palaces, imported objects, and state heritage narratives are often more visible than households, women, children, farmers, herders, fishers, craftspeople, migrants, captives, enslaved or coerced people, and rural communities. Evidence gaps must not be filled with evolutionary hierarchy, ethnic purity, foreign-founder, empty-land, lost-civilization, or simple population-replacement narratives.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Armenian, Azerbaijani, Georgian, and other relevant national and regional heritage institutions, living-community institutions, accountable archaeological missions, peer-reviewed projects, and UNESCO records. Register inscriptions and ancient or later texts with date, genre, language, audience, and viewpoint. Do not register Wikipedia or add rock-art, cave, sacred-site, burial, artifact, or human-remains imagery without per-file licensing, attribution, access-policy, community consideration, and ethical review.

  1. C1

    Dmanisi Hominid Archaeological Site

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2007; current tentative-list record

  2. C2

    Gobustan Rock Art Cultural Landscape

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological heritage record · 2007; current record

  3. C3

    The Culture of Shengavit

    History Museum of Armenia · National archaeological museum resource · Current museum research resource

  4. C4

    Areni-1 Cave

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2026; current tentative-list record

  5. C5

    Archaeological Collection

    History Museum of Armenia · National museum archaeological collections resource · Current institutional resource

  6. C6

    Historical Monuments of Mtskheta

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International cultural-heritage record · 1994; current record

  7. C7

    Vani Archaeological Museum

    Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum and site resource · Current museum resource

  8. C8

    Department of Ancient Archaeology

    Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource

  9. C9

    Citadel, Ancient City and Fortress Buildings of Derbent

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological and architectural heritage record · 2003; current record

  10. C10

    Nokalakevi Archaeological Project

    Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current archaeological project resource

  11. C11

    Ancient Archaeology Department

    Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource

  12. C12

    Museum Reserve Erebuni

    Yerevan Municipality · Public archaeological museum resource · Current municipal museum directory

  13. S1

    Nokalakevi Archaeological Project

    Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current project resource

  14. S2

    Nokalakevi Museum-Reserve and archaeological collections

    Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum resource · Current institutional resource

  15. S3

    Late antique archaeology in Georgia

    University of Cambridge Department of Archaeology · University archaeological research resource · Current university research directory

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: August 5, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期