Deep History of the Caucasus: Highlands, Lowlands, and Connected Worlds
Western Georgia, Colchian lowlands, and eastern Black Sea hinterland · Perfil con revisión de fuentes

Lazica/Egrisi and Nokalakevi

Egrisi / ეგრისი; Nokalakevi / ნოქალაქევი

Fortifications, churches, palatial and domestic buildings, baths, ceramics, coins, burials, and surrounding settlement evidence illuminate a western Georgian kingdom within Roman-Sasanian competition and local networks.

Late-antique kingdom, fortified city, household, religious, military, and imperial-encounter context Approximately fourth-seventh centuries CE for principal Lazica/Egrisi phases, within a longer site sequence Fortifications, urban excavation, domestic and elite architecture, churches, baths, ceramics, coins, burials, landscape survey, and attributed Byzantine, Persian, and Georgian texts Nokalakevi archaeological site; a major fortified center and probable Archaeopolis, not the center of every Lazican community or a modern boundary
Resumo

Evidências, paisagens, escala comunitária, organização política e conexões

Conexões montanhosos, fluviais, do mar Negro, do Cáspio, anatolias, iranias e esteparias

Rivers, fertile lowlands, forests, roads, mountain approaches, Black Sea connections, forts, farms, and churches supported regional power and everyday life.

Organização política e escala comunitária

Kings, courts, local elites, fortified centers, churches, rural communities, soldiers, and Roman and Sasanian interests shaped changing authority and obligations.

Transformação na Antiguidade tardia, patrimônio vivo e recepção moderna

Georgian institutions and international partners steward Nokalakevi. Lazica/Egrisi history cannot adjudicate present borders, ethnic identity, or personal ancestry.

Probable historical identification Archaeopolis

The identification is strong but should remain an evidence-based attribution rather than a timeless name.

Current research [S1] [S2]
Political setting Lazica/Egrisi amid Roman-Sasanian competition

Local rulers and communities had agency within imperial conflict.

Sixth-century context [S1] [S3]
Representativeness one fortified center, not the entire kingdom

Rural, coastal, and mountain communities require additional evidence.

Reviewed 2026 [S2] [S3]
Sequência histórica

Uma cronologia breve e documentada

Estes marcos servem de orientação e não constituem uma história completa.

  1. Fortified urban center develops

    Walls, buildings, churches, households, and routes supported local and royal institutions in western Georgia.

    [S1] [S2] [S3]

  2. Lazic War reshapes the region

    Eastern Roman and Sasanian forces competed through alliances, siege, movement, coercion, and local political choices.

    [S1] [S2] [S3]

  3. Religious and political institutions transform

    Churches, fortifications, settlement, and imperial relations changed unevenly without simple population replacement.

    [S1] [S2]

  4. Anglo-Georgian project expands research

    Stratigraphic excavation, survey, conservation, training, and publication refined the site's long chronology.

    [S1] [S2] [S3]
Cultura e língua

Famílias, subsistência, trabalho, língua, crenças, artesanato, intercâmbio e mobilidade

Línguas mencionadas neste perfil

  • Kartvelian languages in regional historical context
  • Greek in eastern Roman institutional and ecclesiastical use
  • Middle Persian and other languages in imperial encounters

Família linguística: Kartvelian language history is relevant, but texts and material culture cannot assign every subject one identity

Long-running fieldwork integrates city, household, burial, and landscape evidence.

Fortifications reveal labor and conflict but not a complete social history.

The Lazic War must be read through partisan imperial authors and local archaeology.

Elite graves, fortresses, royal inscriptions, churches, palaces, imported objects, and state heritage narratives are often more visible than households, women, children, farmers, herders, fishers, craftspeople, migrants, captives, enslaved or coerced people, and rural communities. Evidence gaps must not be filled with evolutionary hierarchy, ethnic purity, foreign-founder, empty-land, lost-civilization, or simple population-replacement narratives.

Guia de pesquisa com IA

Pergunta sobre este perfil revisto

O guia pode explicar e relacionar fatos que já aparecem nesta página. Não pode procurar na web aberta, estabelecer identidade ou cidadania, nem avaliar ascendência ou informação genética.

Baseada no conteúdo aprovado do perfil As citações usam os identificadores de fontes abaixo Sem contexto de conta ou DNA

Interpretação de similaridade genética gerada por IA, sem comprovação de ancestralidade. Conteúdo informativo, sem caráter de orientação profissional.

Ler o aviso completo

Antes de continuar, saiba que a análise será produzida por um modelo de IA. O conteúdo pode ser incompleto, impreciso ou incorreto. Ele descreve similaridade genética estatística com populações de referência e não comprova ancestralidade, etnia, identidade ou descendência. Destina-se apenas a fins informativos e educacionais e não constitui orientação médica, diagnóstica, genealógica, jurídica ou de outra natureza profissional. Não se baseie nele para tomar decisões de saúde, financeiras, jurídicas ou familiares. Na medida permitida pela legislação aplicável, a DNA Genics, S.L. não assume responsabilidade por perdas ou decisões decorrentes do uso desse conteúdo.

Não introduza nomes, dados de contato, informações da árvore genealógica, identificadores de conta ou kit, nem dados genéticos.

Cadastro de Testes

Fontes usadas nesta página

Prefer Armenian, Azerbaijani, Georgian, and other relevant national and regional heritage institutions, living-community institutions, accountable archaeological missions, peer-reviewed projects, and UNESCO records. Register inscriptions and ancient or later texts with date, genre, language, audience, and viewpoint. Do not register Wikipedia or add rock-art, cave, sacred-site, burial, artifact, or human-remains imagery without per-file licensing, attribution, access-policy, community consideration, and ethical review.

  1. C1

    Dmanisi Hominid Archaeological Site

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2007; current tentative-list record

  2. C2

    Gobustan Rock Art Cultural Landscape

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological heritage record · 2007; current record

  3. C3

    The Culture of Shengavit

    History Museum of Armenia · National archaeological museum resource · Current museum research resource

  4. C4

    Areni-1 Cave

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2026; current tentative-list record

  5. C5

    Archaeological Collection

    History Museum of Armenia · National museum archaeological collections resource · Current institutional resource

  6. C6

    Historical Monuments of Mtskheta

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International cultural-heritage record · 1994; current record

  7. C7

    Vani Archaeological Museum

    Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum and site resource · Current museum resource

  8. C8

    Department of Ancient Archaeology

    Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource

  9. C9

    Citadel, Ancient City and Fortress Buildings of Derbent

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological and architectural heritage record · 2003; current record

  10. C10

    Nokalakevi Archaeological Project

    Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current archaeological project resource

  11. C11

    Ancient Archaeology Department

    Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource

  12. C12

    Museum Reserve Erebuni

    Yerevan Municipality · Public archaeological museum resource · Current municipal museum directory

  13. S1

    Nokalakevi Archaeological Project

    Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current project resource

  14. S2

    Nokalakevi Museum-Reserve and archaeological collections

    Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum resource · Current institutional resource

  15. S3

    Late antique archaeology in Georgia

    University of Cambridge Department of Archaeology · University archaeological research resource · Current university research directory

Las fuentes y los nombres siguen siendo propiedad de sus respectivos editores y comunidades. Se incluyen con fines de cita y educación; su inclusión no implica que avalen a DNAGENICS. Los resúmenes son paráfrasis editoriales originales y deben contrastarse con la fuente enlazada para usos importantes.

Revisión editorial: 5 agosto 2026

Relatório de DNA opcional

Explore the separate paid DNA report for a personal genetic-similarity comparison designed for customers who want analysis beyond this educational atlas.

The Historical Atlas is free and uses no DNA or genetic data. The paid report is a separate genetic-similarity product, and this atlas cannot establish ethnicity, nationality, identity, ancestry, descent, recognition, sovereignty, territory, or community membership.
Ver o relatório
Continuar a explorar
Eastern Black Sea coast and Chorokhi corridor Apsaros/Gonio and Black Sea frontier communities Apsaros / Gonio / გონიო Ler o Perfil Arpa River valley and southern Armenian Highlands Areni-1 Chalcolithic cave communities Areni-1 / Արենի-1 քարանձավ Ler o Perfil Ararat Plain and Armenian Highlands Artaxiad Armenia and Artashat Artashat / Արտաշատ; Artaxiad Armenia Ler o Perfil