Lind Coulee: upland work and a revisited research archive - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持，请使用打印功能。

Great Basin and Columbia Plateau Worlds: Lakes, Rivers, and Living Homelands
Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) · Source-reviewed profile

Lind Coulee: upland work and a revisited research archive

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

Reclamation distinguishes this camp setting from better-known riverine records and describes repeated use, not a permanent ethnic capital. The WSU repository identifies supervision of the Lind Coulee materials by Reclamation, separating curation from unrestricted public reuse.

Upland camp and collections-history context Early Holocene; published age estimates use different dating conventions Stone and bone tools, animal remains, stratigraphy and curated excavation collections Moses Lake, Washington, United States (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, cave-entrance, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, hunting, gathering, farming, fishing, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting, fishing or travel permission is implied.
概览

Caves, wetlands, households, rivers, and the evidence

Basin, plateau, lake, river, and neighboring connections

Moses Lake, Washington, United States is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. A repeatedly used camp does not demonstrate a single early regional authority or every household's economy.

Political organization and community scale

A repeatedly used camp does not demonstrate a single early regional authority or every household's economy. Lind Coulee's older first-site rhetoric and differing age estimates require historical context; upland finds cannot identify a single language, people or fixed migration route.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Archaeological tools and deposits cannot identify every ancient speaker; living communities' own names and histories have independent authority. Events after 1800 CE and modern research, reconstruction and stewardship are dated separately from the main historical context.

Upland activity Reclamation distinguishes this camp setting from better-known riverine records and describes repeated use, not a permanent ethnic capital.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Collections stewardship The WSU repository identifies supervision of the Lind Coulee materials by Reclamation, separating curation from unrestricted public reuse.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Heritage designation The National Register record dates listing to January 1974; designation is not an occupation date or proof of Tribal endorsement.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Repeated camp use

    Reclamation's account describes tools and animal evidence; published age conventions require qualification.

    [S1]

  2. Initial excavation

    The federal account records early investigation rather than first Indigenous awareness.

    [S1]

  3. Renewed testing

    Reclamation records a later test campaign.

    [S1]

  4. Register listing

    The designation records institutional protection history, not ancient chronology.

    [S3]
文化和语言

Foodways, fiber work, farming, storage, and household labor

本简介中命名的语言

  • Archaeological tools and deposits cannot identify every ancient speaker; living communities' own names and histories have independent authority.

语言家庭: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Stone and bone tools, animal remains, stratigraphy and curated excavation collections.

A repeatedly used camp does not demonstrate a single early regional authority or every household's economy.

Lind Coulee's older first-site rhetoric and differing age estimates require historical context; upland finds cannot identify a single language, people or fixed migration route.

No artifact, rock-art, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。

阅读完整说明

继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    A Brief History of CTUIR

    Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute: public exhibition introduction

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  3. C3

    Expanding Paleoindian Diet Breadth: Paleoethnobotany of Connley Cave 5, Oregon, USA

    Katelyn N. McDonough, Jaime L. Kennedy, Richard L. Rosencrance, Justin A. Holcomb, Dennis L. Jenkins and Kathryn Puseman; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022

  4. C4

    Return to Fort Rock Cave: Assessing the Site's Potential to Contribute to Ongoing Debates About How and When Humans Colonized the Great Basin

    Thomas J. Connolly and colleagues; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2017

  5. C5

    Xwísten Community Profile

    Xwísten, Bridge River Indian Band · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2014 web edition

  6. C6

    Introduction Lesson: Syilx History

    Okanagan Nation Alliance, Syilx 101 · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    History and Archaeology

    Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  8. C8

    Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Typology and Chronology Across the Great Basin

    Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resource Series; Bryan Hockett and collaborators · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022-12-21 institutional record

  9. S1

    Washington: Lind Coulee Archaeological Site

    United States Bureau of Reclamation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  10. S2

    Our Partner Agencies

    Washington State University Museum of Anthropology · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  11. S3

    Lind Coulee Archaeological Site: National Register record

    National Park Service · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 1974-01-21 listing

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

继续探索
Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) Celilo: river foodways, exchange, and living communities Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件 Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) Keatley Creek: housepits, food storage, and social interpretation Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件 Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) Kettle Falls: Upper Columbia gathering and later disruption Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件
使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期