Keatley Creek: housepits, food storage, and social interpretation
Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.
The first volume examines dating and deposit formation before interpreting household activities. The second volume compares food use, architecture and social organization; inequality models remain interpretations rather than transparent records of offices.
Caves, wetlands, households, rivers, and the evidence
Basin, plateau, lake, river, and neighboring connections
Lillooet, British Columbia, Canada is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state.
Political organization and community scale
House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state. Keatley Creek house-size, hierarchy and abandonment models are interpretations; charcoal dates, reused floors and later digital editions require separate chronologies.
Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception
Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Archaeological horizons cannot assign every resident a language; St’át’imc living heritage has authority beyond archaeological models. Events after 1800 CE and modern research, reconstruction and stewardship are dated separately from the main historical context.
Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.
Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.
Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.
简洁、来源化的时间表
这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.
-
Winter-house contexts
Successive housepit deposits support household-scale study, not one occupation date for every structure.
-
Formation and social syntheses
The first two volumes distinguish evidence formation from socioeconomic reconstruction.
Foodways, fiber work, farming, storage, and household labor
本简介中命名的语言
- Archaeological horizons cannot assign every resident a language; St’át’imc living heritage has authority beyond archaeological models.
语言家庭: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.
Research focus: Housepit floors, plant and animal remains, stone assemblages and depositional studies.
House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state.
Keatley Creek house-size, hierarchy and abandonment models are interpretations; charcoal dates, reused floors and later digital editions require separate chronologies.
No artifact, rock-art, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.
DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.
询问此已审查的配置文件
该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。
AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考,不构成专业建议。
阅读完整说明
继续前请注意,您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性,不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习,不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内,DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。
本页使用的来源
Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.
-
C1
A Brief History of CTUIR
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20
-
C2
Tamástslikt Cultural Institute: public exhibition introduction
Tamástslikt Cultural Institute, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20
-
C3
Expanding Paleoindian Diet Breadth: Paleoethnobotany of Connley Cave 5, Oregon, USA
Katelyn N. McDonough, Jaime L. Kennedy, Richard L. Rosencrance, Justin A. Holcomb, Dennis L. Jenkins and Kathryn Puseman; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022
-
C4
Return to Fort Rock Cave: Assessing the Site's Potential to Contribute to Ongoing Debates About How and When Humans Colonized the Great Basin
Thomas J. Connolly and colleagues; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2017
-
C5
Xwísten Community Profile
Xwísten, Bridge River Indian Band · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2014 web edition
-
C6
Introduction Lesson: Syilx History
Okanagan Nation Alliance, Syilx 101 · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20
-
C7
History and Archaeology
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20
-
C8
Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Typology and Chronology Across the Great Basin
Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resource Series; Bryan Hockett and collaborators · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022-12-21 institutional record
-
S1
The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume I: Taphonomy
Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2000; digital edition 2017
-
S2
The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume II: Socioeconomy
Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2000; digital edition 2017
-
S3
The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume III: Excavations and Artifacts
Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2004; digital edition 2017
Editorial review: October 20, 2026