Liang Bua: Flores and revised chronology - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持，请使用打印功能。

Island Southeast Asian Worlds: Caves, Coastal Communities, and Maritime Networks
Flores · Source-reviewed profile

Liang Bua: Flores and revised chronology

Liang Bua: Flores and revised chronology

The 2004 article introduced Homo floresiensis as a scientific interpretation of excavated evidence, not a living ethnic category. The 2016 reconstruction separates the approximately 100,000–60,000-year-old remains from a broader stone-artifact sequence.

Pleistocene cave research context Pleistocene evidence, including approximately 100,000–60,000-year-old hominin remains; later layers distinguished Excavated stratigraphy, dating and scientific species descriptions Ruteng, Flores: approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, cave-entrance, private compound, underwater or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, fishing, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting, ritual or travel permission is implied.
概览

Island landscapes, work, and changing connections

Island landscapes and regional connections

Flores is a modern orientation frame for the named context and connected places, not an ancient territorial, ethnic, language, religious, sovereignty or maritime-rights boundary.

Political organization and community scale

No named political organization is recoverable from these deposits. Liang Bua's revised dates replace earlier very late estimates; they do not establish an exact extinction cause, direct modern descent or a ranking of human worth.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Living communities and heritage or religious institutions retain their own authority. This atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, religion, recognition or membership. Liang Bua's revised dates replace earlier very late estimates; they do not establish an exact extinction cause, direct modern descent or a ranking of human worth. Events after 1500 CE are separately identified as later outcomes, research, conservation or reception.

A scientific description The 2004 article introduced Homo floresiensis as a scientific interpretation of excavated evidence, not a living ethnic category.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain sampling, dating and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S1]
Chronology was revised The 2016 reconstruction separates the approximately 100,000–60,000-year-old remains from a broader stone-artifact sequence.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain sampling, dating and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S2]
An ongoing project The Smithsonian account places the discovery within a continuing Indonesian and international research program.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain sampling, dating and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Different evidence has different ages

    The revised study distinguishes dates associated with remains from dates of deposits and stone artifacts.

    [S2]

  2. Investigations developed

    The project account describes renewed excavation before the better-known discoveries.

    [S3]

  3. Discovery and publication

    Excavation preceded the published scientific description; neither event supplies an ancient self-designation.

    [S1] [S3]

  4. Stratigraphy changed the model

    Revised dating undermined the original very recent survival estimate without fixing a single explanation for disappearance.

    [S2]
文化和语言

Households, fishing, farming, craft, writing, and belief

本简介中命名的语言

  • No prehistoric language or living identity is established by the scientific species label.

语言家庭: Language, script, material classification, political allegiance, religion and living identity require different evidence; no language census is inferred.

Research focus: Excavated stratigraphy, dating and scientific species descriptions.

No named political organization is recoverable from these deposits.

Liang Bua's revised dates replace earlier very late estimates; they do not establish an exact extinction cause, direct modern descent or a ranking of human worth.

No artifact, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery, restricted knowledge or genetic interpretation is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。

阅读完整说明

继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer accountable dating studies, excavation projects, regional scholars, national museums and attributed heritage assessments. Historical reports, retrospective court narratives and public institutional interpretations retain their dates and limits. Brief original paraphrases cite sources; no cited author, institution or community endorsed this atlas.

  1. C1

    4000 Years of Migration and Cultural Exchange: The Archaeology of the Batanes Islands, Northern Philippines

    Peter Bellwood and Eusebio Dizon, editors; Terra Australis 40; ANU Press · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2013

  2. C2

    Neolithic foundations in the Karama Valley, West Sulawesi, Indonesia

    Anggraeni, Truman Simanjuntak, Peter Bellwood and Philip Piper; Antiquity · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2014

  3. C3

    The Laguna Copper-Plate Inscription: Text and commentary

    Antoon Postma; Philippine Studies 40(2), 183–203; Ateneo de Manila University repository · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 1992 print; repository metadata 2012

  4. C4

    The antiquity of sustained offshore fishing

    Atholl Anderson; Antiquity · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2013

  5. C5

    Cave archaeology and sampling issues in the tropics: A case study from Lene Hara Cave, a 42,000 year old occupation site in East Timor, Island Southeast Asia

    Sue O'Connor, Anthony Barham, Matthew Spriggs, Peter Veth, Ken Aplin and Emma St Pierre; Australian Archaeology 71 · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2010

  6. C6

    The dynamics of culture and nature in a 'protected' Fataluku landscape

    Sue O'Connor, Sandra Pannell and Sally Brockwell; Transcending the Culture–Nature Divide in Cultural Heritage, chapter 14; ANU Press · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2013

  7. C7

    Cultural Landscape of Bali Province: the Subak System as a Manifestation of the Tri Hita Karana Philosophy

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · Undated record; consulted 2026-10-21

  8. C8

    Sangkulirang – Mangkalihat Karts: Prehistoric rock art area

    Permanent Delegation of Indonesia to UNESCO; tentative-list submission · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2015

  9. S1

    A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia

    P. Brown, T. Sutikna, M. J. Morwood and colleagues; Nature 431, 1055–1061 · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2004

  10. S2

    Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia

    Thomas Sutikna and colleagues; Nature 532, 366–369 · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2016

  11. S3

    'Hobbits' on Flores, Indonesia

    Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Human Origins Program · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · Undated record; consulted 2026-10-21

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 21, 2026

可选的DNA报告

An optional link to the separate paid regional report. It is not historical evidence or a test of community identity.

The Historical Atlas is free, uses no DNA, and is separate from the paid report. It cannot establish identity, religion, ethnicity, ancestry, descent or community membership.
Explore the separate report
继续探索
Northern Philippines Batanes: island households and exchange Batanes: island households and exchange 读取配置文件 Southern Luzon Calatagan: an inscribed pot and reading debates Calatagan: an inscribed pot and reading debates 读取配置文件 Palawan Ille Cave: Palawan and changing environments Ille Cave: Palawan and changing environments 读取配置文件
使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期