Island Southeast Asian Worlds: Caves, Coastal Communities, and Maritime Networks
Flores · Perfil con revisión de fuentes

Liang Bua: Flores and revised chronology

Liang Bua: Flores and revised chronology

The 2004 article introduced Homo floresiensis as a scientific interpretation of excavated evidence, not a living ethnic category. The 2016 reconstruction separates the approximately 100,000–60,000-year-old remains from a broader stone-artifact sequence.

Pleistocene cave research context Pleistocene evidence, including approximately 100,000–60,000-year-old hominin remains; later layers distinguished Excavated stratigraphy, dating and scientific species descriptions Ruteng, Flores: approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, cave-entrance, private compound, underwater or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, fishing, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting, ritual or travel permission is implied.
Resumen

Paisajes insulares, trabajo y conexiones cambiantes

Paisajes insulares y conexiones regionales

Flores is a modern orientation frame for the named context and connected places, not an ancient territorial, ethnic, language, religious, sovereignty or maritime-rights boundary.

Organización política y escala comunitaria

No named political organization is recoverable from these deposits. Liang Bua's revised dates replace earlier very late estimates; they do not establish an exact extinction cause, direct modern descent or a ranking of human worth.

Transformación posterior, patrimonio vivo y recepción moderna

Living communities and heritage or religious institutions retain their own authority. This atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, religion, recognition or membership. Liang Bua's revised dates replace earlier very late estimates; they do not establish an exact extinction cause, direct modern descent or a ranking of human worth. Events after 1500 CE are separately identified as later outcomes, research, conservation or reception.

A scientific description The 2004 article introduced Homo floresiensis as a scientific interpretation of excavated evidence, not a living ethnic category.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain sampling, dating and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S1]
Chronology was revised The 2016 reconstruction separates the approximately 100,000–60,000-year-old remains from a broader stone-artifact sequence.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain sampling, dating and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S2]
An ongoing project The Smithsonian account places the discovery within a continuing Indonesian and international research program.

Brief independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase, not author, institution or community endorsement. Retain sampling, dating and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-21 [S3]
Secuencia histórica

Una cronología breve y documentada

Estos hitos sirven de orientación y no constituyen una historia completa.

  1. Different evidence has different ages

    The revised study distinguishes dates associated with remains from dates of deposits and stone artifacts.

  2. Investigations developed

    The project account describes renewed excavation before the better-known discoveries.

  3. Discovery and publication

    Excavation preceded the published scientific description; neither event supplies an ancient self-designation.

  4. Stratigraphy changed the model

    Revised dating undermined the original very recent survival estimate without fixing a single explanation for disappearance.

Cultura e idioma

Hogares, pesca, agricultura, artesanía, escritura y creencias

Idiomas mencionados en este perfil

  • No prehistoric language or living identity is established by the scientific species label.

Familia lingüística: Language, script, material classification, political allegiance, religion and living identity require different evidence; no language census is inferred.

Research focus: Excavated stratigraphy, dating and scientific species descriptions.

No named political organization is recoverable from these deposits.

Liang Bua's revised dates replace earlier very late estimates; they do not establish an exact extinction cause, direct modern descent or a ranking of human worth.

No artifact, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery, restricted knowledge or genetic interpretation is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

Guía de investigación con IA

Pregunta sobre este perfil revisado

La guía puede explicar y relacionar hechos que ya aparecen en esta página. No puede buscar en la web abierta, establecer identidad ni ciudadanía, ni evaluar ascendencia o información genética.

Basada en el contenido aprobado del perfil Las citas utilizan los identificadores de fuentes de abajo Sin contexto de cuenta ni de ADN

No introduzcas nombres, datos de contacto, información del árbol genealógico, identificadores de cuenta o kit, ni datos genéticos.

Registro de pruebas

Fuentes utilizadas en esta página

Prefer accountable dating studies, excavation projects, regional scholars, national museums and attributed heritage assessments. Historical reports, retrospective court narratives and public institutional interpretations retain their dates and limits. Brief original paraphrases cite sources; no cited author, institution or community endorsed this atlas.

  1. C1

    4000 Years of Migration and Cultural Exchange: The Archaeology of the Batanes Islands, Northern Philippines

    Peter Bellwood and Eusebio Dizon, editors; Terra Australis 40; ANU Press · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2013

  2. C2

    Neolithic foundations in the Karama Valley, West Sulawesi, Indonesia

    Anggraeni, Truman Simanjuntak, Peter Bellwood and Philip Piper; Antiquity · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2014

  3. C3

    The Laguna Copper-Plate Inscription: Text and commentary

    Antoon Postma; Philippine Studies 40(2), 183–203; Ateneo de Manila University repository · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 1992 print; repository metadata 2012

  4. C4

    The antiquity of sustained offshore fishing

    Atholl Anderson; Antiquity · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2013

  5. C5

    Cave archaeology and sampling issues in the tropics: A case study from Lene Hara Cave, a 42,000 year old occupation site in East Timor, Island Southeast Asia

    Sue O'Connor, Anthony Barham, Matthew Spriggs, Peter Veth, Ken Aplin and Emma St Pierre; Australian Archaeology 71 · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2010

  6. C6

    The dynamics of culture and nature in a 'protected' Fataluku landscape

    Sue O'Connor, Sandra Pannell and Sally Brockwell; Transcending the Culture–Nature Divide in Cultural Heritage, chapter 14; ANU Press · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2013

  7. C7

    Cultural Landscape of Bali Province: the Subak System as a Manifestation of the Tri Hita Karana Philosophy

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · Undated record; consulted 2026-10-21

  8. C8

    Sangkulirang – Mangkalihat Karts: Prehistoric rock art area

    Permanent Delegation of Indonesia to UNESCO; tentative-list submission · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2015

  9. S1

    A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia

    P. Brown, T. Sutikna, M. J. Morwood and colleagues; Nature 431, 1055–1061 · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2004

  10. S2

    Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia

    Thomas Sutikna and colleagues; Nature 532, 366–369 · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · 2016

  11. S3

    'Hobbits' on Flores, Indonesia

    Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Human Origins Program · Archaeological study, museum interpretation or attributed heritage record; brief independent DNAGENICS paraphrase · Undated record; consulted 2026-10-21

Las fuentes y los nombres siguen siendo propiedad de sus respectivos editores y comunidades. Se incluyen con fines de cita y educación; su inclusión no implica que avalen a DNAGENICS. Los resúmenes son paráfrasis editoriales originales y deben contrastarse con la fuente enlazada para usos importantes.

Revisión editorial: 21 octubre 2026