Meier: lower Columbia household work and storage - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持，请使用打印功能。

Pacific Coast North American Worlds: Coastal Communities, River Networks, and Living Homelands
Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) · Source-reviewed profile

Meier: lower Columbia household work and storage

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

The project describes a large plankhouse and associated work areas, with only part of the interior excavated. Smith examines how activities and later deposition affected object distributions; a find spot is not an automatic status label.

Plank-house household and production context Approximately 1400–1700 CE focus; continued occupation into the nineteenth century separate Excavated house features, artifact distribution, food remains and site-formation analysis St Helens, Oregon, United States (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, fishing, farming, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting or travel permission is implied.
概览

Coastal households, river connections, and the evidence

Coastal, island, estuary, and river connections

St Helens, Oregon, United States is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. A large household's production and storage differ from a whole town, and rank reconstructions require explicit evidence.

Political organization and community scale

A large household's production and storage differ from a whole town, and rank reconstructions require explicit evidence. Storage capacity and artifact distribution are models, not exact resident totals or the identity of every worker; later occupation is not all precontact.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Chinookan historical context does not assign one language or status to every person using the household. Later colonial, research, reconstruction and stewardship events are dated separately from the main archaeological context.

Household archive The project describes a large plankhouse and associated work areas, with only part of the interior excavated.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Formation processes Smith examines how activities and later deposition affected object distributions; a find spot is not an automatic status label.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Craft comparison Fuld compares bone and antler technologies at Meier and Cathlapotle rather than treating the settlements as interchangeable.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Household sequence begins

    The project places the excavated house sequence around this period; dates are archaeological estimates.

    [S1]

  2. Storage and repeated work

    House features and production materials provide evidence of household activities, not a precise population census.

    [S2]

  3. Continued occupation

    Published ranges extend after European contact; that later evidence must not all be called precontact.

    [S3]

  4. Field excavation

    PSU investigations sampled house, midden and surrounding work areas.

    [S1]

  5. Technological comparison

    Fuld studied artifacts from both river settlements in their respective contexts.

    [S3]
文化和语言

Foodways, craft, household work, and tended landscapes

本简介中命名的语言

  • Chinookan historical context does not assign one language or status to every person using the household.

语言家庭: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Excavated house features, artifact distribution, food remains and site-formation analysis.

A large household's production and storage differ from a whole town, and rank reconstructions require explicit evidence.

Storage capacity and artifact distribution are models, not exact resident totals or the identity of every worker; later occupation is not all precontact.

No artifact, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

AI 对遗传相似性的解读不能证明祖源。内容仅供参考，不构成专业建议。

阅读完整说明

继续前请注意，您即将生成的分析由 AI 模型提供。AI 输出可能不完整、不准确或有误。它描述与参考人群之间的统计遗传相似性，不能证明祖源、族裔、身份或血缘关系。内容仅供参考和学习，不构成医疗、诊断、家谱、法律或其他专业建议。请勿据此作出健康、财务、法律或家庭决定。在适用法律允许的最大范围内，DNA Genics, S.L. 不对使用该 AI 输出所产生的损失或决定承担责任。

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    About the Makah Cultural and Research Center

    Makah Cultural and Research Center · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    3500 years of shellfish mariculture on the Northwest Coast of North America

    Nicole F. Smith and coauthors; PLOS ONE · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2019-02-27

  3. C3

    Reevaluating the antiquity of the Palmrose site

    Gabriel M. Sanchez; PLOS ONE · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2021-08-17

  4. C4

    Historic Timeline

    Musqueam Teaching Resource; Musqueam and UBC Museum of Anthropology · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  5. C5

    History

    Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  6. C6

    History

    Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    Gwaii Haanas Management Plan 2018

    Parks Canada · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2018

  8. C8

    Collaborative digital curation and recursive publics: The making of Sq’éwlets

    Project team; Museums and the Web · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2018

  9. S1

    Virtual Meier Site: Introduction

    Cameron M. Smith; Portland State University · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  10. S2

    Formation Processes at Meier

    Cameron M. Smith; Portland State University · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2005

  11. S3

    The Technological Role of Bone and Antler Artifacts on the Lower Columbia

    Kristen Ann Fuld; Portland State University · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2010

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

继续探索
Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) Cathlapotle: lower Columbia plank-house communities Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件 Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) Hoko River: wet-site technologies and seasonal work Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件 Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) Netarts Bay: settlement, estuary change, and research limits Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. 读取配置文件
使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期