Hoko River: wet-site technologies and seasonal work - History, Government, Language, and Sources

下载的 PDF 是图像副本。如需可选中文本及更好的辅助技术支持,请使用打印功能。

Pacific Coast North American Worlds: Coastal Communities, River Networks, and Living Homelands
Washington and Oregon coast–river contexts (orientation only) · Source-reviewed profile

Hoko River: wet-site technologies and seasonal work

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

The wet/dry-site monograph documents fiber, wood and fishing technologies that ordinary dry-site survival can conceal. Croes's earlier report derives from test excavations and available collections, not a complete village census.

Wet-site technology and foodways context Approximately 3000–1700 BP in the wet/dry-site study; later rock-shelter phases separate Waterlogged wood and fiber, faunal evidence, excavation reports and subsistence modeling Sekiu, Washington, United States (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, fishing, farming, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting or travel permission is implied.
概览

Coastal households, river connections, and the evidence

Coastal, island, estuary, and river connections

Sekiu, Washington, United States is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. Seasonal activities and household technologies cannot be converted into one fixed regional authority.

Political organization and community scale

Seasonal activities and household technologies cannot be converted into one fixed regional authority. Wet/dry-site and later rock-shelter phases are not one simultaneous settlement; BP notation is not an exact calendar conversion.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Makah-area history provides regional context, not a recovered language for every archaeological deposit. Later colonial, research, reconstruction and stewardship events are dated separately from the main archaeological context.

Organic technologies The wet/dry-site monograph documents fiber, wood and fishing technologies that ordinary dry-site survival can conceal.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Limited field sample Croes's earlier report derives from test excavations and available collections, not a complete village census.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Changing food practices The subsistence study compares contexts and models rather than assuming one unchanging coastal economy.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
历史序列

简洁、来源化的时间表

这些里程碑是指向点,而不是完整的历史.

  1. Wet/dry-site sequence

    The monograph's stated range identifies a sampled archaeological sequence, not every Hoko River activity.

  2. Rock-shelter comparison

    The subsistence study distinguishes a later sequence; outcomes beyond 1700 CE are later context.

  3. Early wet-site report

    Test work and collections informed an initial published interpretation.

  4. Subsistence modeling

    Croes compared changing practices and different contexts.

  5. Wet/dry-site monograph

    Detailed analysis expanded the record without eliminating preservation or sampling bias.

文化和语言

Foodways, craft, household work, and tended landscapes

本简介中命名的语言

  • Makah-area history provides regional context, not a recovered language for every archaeological deposit.

语言家庭: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Waterlogged wood and fiber, faunal evidence, excavation reports and subsistence modeling.

Seasonal activities and household technologies cannot be converted into one fixed regional authority.

Wet/dry-site and later rock-shelter phases are not one simultaneous settlement; BP notation is not an exact calendar conversion.

No artifact, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

AI 研究指南

询问此已审查的配置文件

该指南可以解释和连接本页面中已经存在的事实,不能搜索开放的网络,确定身份或公民身份,也不能评估祖先和遗传信息。

以核准的简介内容为依据 引用使用下面的源代码 没有账户或DNA上下文

不输入姓名、联系方式、家庭-树木信息、账户或工具包识别资料或遗传数据。

证据登记册

本页使用的来源

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    About the Makah Cultural and Research Center

    Makah Cultural and Research Center · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    3500 years of shellfish mariculture on the Northwest Coast of North America

    Nicole F. Smith and coauthors; PLOS ONE · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2019-02-27

  3. C3

    Reevaluating the antiquity of the Palmrose site

    Gabriel M. Sanchez; PLOS ONE · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2021-08-17

  4. C4

    Historic Timeline

    Musqueam Teaching Resource; Musqueam and UBC Museum of Anthropology · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  5. C5

    History

    Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  6. C6

    History

    Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    Gwaii Haanas Management Plan 2018

    Parks Canada · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2018

  8. C8

    Collaborative digital curation and recursive publics: The making of Sq’éwlets

    Project team; Museums and the Web · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2018

  9. S1

    The Hoko River archaeological site complex: The wet/dry site, 3,000–1,700 B.P.

    Dale R. Croes; Washington State University Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 1995

  10. S2

    An Early Wet Site at the Mouth of the Hoko River

    Dale R. Croes; Canadian Museum of History, WSU repository · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 1976

  11. S3

    Exploring prehistoric subsistence change on the Northwest Coast

    Dale R. Croes; Research in Economic Anthropology, WSU repository · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 1992

来源和名称仍然是各自出版商和社区的财产,列入这些来源和名称是为了引证和教育;并不意味着认可DNAGENICS,摘要是编辑原文,应与链接来源核对,以便重要使用。

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

使用优惠码 可减免 35% • 11月12日 到期