Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13721
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Taiwan in the Late Iron Age era

I13721
1366 BCE - 1126 BCE
Female
Gongguan Culture
Taiwan
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13721

Date Range

1366 BCE - 1126 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

Y2a1

Cultural Period

Gongguan Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Taiwan
Locality Green Island. Gongguan site
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13721 1366 BCE - 1126 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Gongguan culture is an archaeological culture associated with the Austronesian peoples, found primarily in the region of Taiwan. This culture is crucial to understanding the early development of Austronesian societies, which eventually spread across vast distances in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. The Gongguan culture, situated mainly around the site in Miaoli County, Taiwan, offers significant insights into the prehistoric period of the island and the broader movements of peoples and cultures in Southeast Asia.

Timeline and Chronology

The Gongguan culture flourished during the Neolithic period, approximately from 2500 BCE to 1500 BCE. This era is marked by transitions in technology, social organization, and subsistence strategies, which are reflected in the archaeological findings from this culture.

Material Culture and Artifacts

The artifacts associated with the Gongguan culture include pottery, stone tools, and evidence of early agricultural practices. The pottery is typically characterized by its cord-marked designs, which are indicative of the broader Neolithic trends in the region. These pottery styles suggest a shared cultural heritage with other Southeast Asian groups and imply interaction and trade.

Stone Tools and Technology: Tools from this culture include polished stone axes, adzes, and chipped stone tools that were likely used in woodworking and other activities. The presence of these tools indicates a society engaged in both farming and hunting-gathering.

Pottery: Gongguan pottery tends to be simple in form but is significant for its decoration, which often includes intricate cord-marked patterns. This suggests a level of social complexity where decorative arts held cultural significance.

Subsistence and Economy

The Gongguan culture was primarily agrarian but supplemented its diet with hunting and gathering. Archaeological evidence, such as grinding stones and remnants of cultivated plants, indicates that they practiced early forms of agriculture, likely focusing on rice cultivation given the climatic conditions and historical development patterns in the region.

Social Organization

While direct evidence of social organization is sparse, the artifacts suggest a community-based lifestyle with some division of labor. The presence of decorative pottery and tools implies a society where craftsmanship was valued, and possibly where social stratification had begun to emerge, but not to the extent seen in later societies.

Settlement Patterns

The settlement patterns of the Gongguan culture reveal that people lived in small, scattered communities. These settlements were typically located near rivers or coastal areas, providing access to both agricultural lands and fishing resources. Houses were likely constructed from organic materials, as evidence points to post holes and remnants of structured foundations in key archaeological sites.

Cultural and Linguistic Implications

The Gongguan culture is part of the broader tapestry of Austronesian cultures, whose descendants spread across the Pacific Islands, reaching as far as New Zealand, Hawaii, and Madagascar. The developments in Taiwan during this period are often considered a precursor to the massive Austronesian expansions. Linguistically, the people of the Gongguan culture would likely have been Proto-Austronesian speakers, contributing to the diverse language family known today.

Archaeological Significance

Excavations at Gongguan and similar sites have provided crucial insights into the nature of Neolithic life in Taiwan. These findings help bridge the understanding between the prehistoric cultures of mainland Asia and the subsequent Austronesian expansions. The cultural artifacts and settlement evidence encapsulate the life of a society on the brink of significant maritime dispersal.

In summary, the Gongguan culture represents a vital link in the early history of Austronesian peoples. Its artifacts, subsistence strategies, and social structures offer a glimpse into the Neolithic changes that would lay the foundation for one of the largest and most significant human migrations in prehistoric times. This culture's contributions to agriculture, technology, and proto-language highlight the complexities and innovations of Taiwan's ancient inhabitants.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I13721 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 100.0%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 99.5%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 99.5%
Chinese 58.6%
Vietnamese 40.9%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Taiwan in the Late Iron Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Dai
1.1763
2
Kinh Vietnam
1.7940
3
Tai Lue
2.0682
4
Gelao
2.3346
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Genomic insights into the formation of human populations in East Asia

Authors Wang CC, Yeh HY, Popov AN
Abstract

The deep population history of East Asia remains poorly understood owing to a lack of ancient DNA data and sparse sampling of present-day people1,2. Here we report genome-wide data from 166 East Asian individuals dating to between 6000 BC and AD 1000 and 46 present-day groups. Hunter-gatherers from Japan, the Amur River Basin, and people of Neolithic and Iron Age Taiwan and the Tibetan Plateau are linked by a deeply splitting lineage that probably reflects a coastal migration during the Late Pleistocene epoch. We also follow expansions during the subsequent Holocene epoch from four regions. First, hunter-gatherers from Mongolia and the Amur River Basin have ancestry shared by individuals who speak Mongolic and Tungusic languages, but do not carry ancestry characteristic of farmers from the West Liao River region (around 3000 BC), which contradicts theories that the expansion of these farmers spread the Mongolic and Tungusic proto-languages. Second, farmers from the Yellow River Basin (around 3000 BC) probably spread Sino-Tibetan languages, as their ancestry dispersed both to Tibet-where it forms approximately 84% of the gene pool in some groups-and to the Central Plain, where it has contributed around 59-84% to modern Han Chinese groups. Third, people from Taiwan from around 1300 BC to AD 800 derived approximately 75% of their ancestry from a lineage that is widespread in modern individuals who speak Austronesian, Tai-Kadai and Austroasiatic languages, and that we hypothesize derives from farmers of the Yangtze River Valley. Ancient people from Taiwan also derived about 25% of their ancestry from a northern lineage that is related to, but different from, farmers of the Yellow River Basin, which suggests an additional north-to-south expansion. Fourth, ancestry from Yamnaya Steppe pastoralists arrived in western Mongolia after around 3000 BC but was displaced by previously established lineages even while it persisted in western China, as would be expected if this ancestry was associated with the spread of proto-Tocharian Indo-European languages. Two later gene flows affected western Mongolia: migrants after around 2000 BC with Yamnaya and European farmer ancestry, and episodic influences of later groups with ancestry from Turan.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I13721 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I13721,0.01645174,-0.4354906,-0.0464336,-0.06045384,0.1140099,0.0621474,-0.00065216,-0.00511136,-0.01864982,-0.01137696,0.00723034,0.0011331,0.0043178,-0.00853964,0.00206952,0.0021938,0.00833808,-0.00355304,-0.00228088,-0.0122452,0.01212086,0.01106922,0.0173867,0.00455474,0.00592073
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27