Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of MUR021
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Mesolithic era

MUR021
3946 BCE - 3658 BCE
Male
Sidelkino Culture
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

MUR021

Date Range

3946 BCE - 3658 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U2e2a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Q-F746

Cultural Period

Sidelkino Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Murzikha-2 (Tatarstan, Alexeyevsky District, Mokrye Kurnali Village)
Coordinates 55.3419, 50.0173
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

MUR021 3946 BCE - 3658 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Sidelkino Culture is a hypothetical or fictional archaeological culture that has not been recognized in historical academic studies up to my last update in October 2023. However, if we are to imagine such a culture existing in a pre-Uralic era, we would need to sketch an imaginative and comprehensive portrayal that reflects plausible characteristics for a prehistoric society. Here's an extensive exploration of what the Sidelkino Culture might look like:

Geographic Setting

The Sidelkino Culture could be situated in the expansive landscapes that lie to the west of the Ural Mountains, in what today may be considered part of Eastern Europe or Western Russia. This region is characterized by vast forests, steppes, and river systems, providing a rich environmental tapestry for early human societies. The climate during the formative period of the Sidelkino would have been temperate, with cold winters and mild summers, aligning with the general climatic conditions known in prehistoric Eurasia.

Timeline

The Sidelkino Culture would plausibly exist during the late Neolithic to early Bronze Age, perhaps around 4000 to 2000 BCE. This era marks significant transitions in human history, characterized by the development of farming, metallurgy, and increasing social complexity.

Economic Practices

The Sidelkino people would likely exhibit a mixed economy of agriculture, hunting, gathering, and fishing. The fertile lands west of the Urals would facilitate the cultivation of grains such as barley and rye. Concurrently, the abundant forests and animal life would support hunting traditions, supplemented by the seasonal gathering of nuts, berries, and plants.

This culture might also show early evidence of animal domestication, with livestock including cattle, sheep, and goats. Domesticated animals provided not only meat but also secondary products like milk, wool, and hides.

Technological Advancements

In terms of technology, the Sidelkino Culture could be marked by the emergence of early metallurgy. The production of copper tools and weapons would have begun to replace earlier stone implements. This culture might also demonstrate early experimentation with bronze, leading to more durable weaponry and tools, thus marking a technological advancement.

Pottery would be a prominent feature, with the Sidelkino artisans creating intricate ceramic designs for both functional and ceremonial uses. Their pottery could display motifs reflecting their religious beliefs or mythological narratives.

Social Organization

The social structure of the Sidelkino might be organized into small, kin-based groups, possibly evolving into more complex chiefdoms as they advanced. Leadership could be based on lineage, spiritual prowess, or martial ability.

Communities would likely be built around village settings with semi-permanent dwellings made from wood and thatch, utilizing the abundant natural resources. Evidence of communal structures such as large gathering halls or ritual spaces could indicate a more organized society with hierarchical elements.

Cultural and Spiritual Life

The spiritual and cultural life of the Sidelkino could be rich and diverse, deeply connected to their natural environment. Animistic beliefs, where natural elements such as rivers, trees, and stones possess spirits, might dominate their religious framework. Shamanistic practices could play a crucial role in both religious ceremonies and healing practices.

Artistic expressions might include intricate carvings, body adornments with beads and shells, and perhaps early petroglyphs depicting animals, gods, and significant myths. Storytelling, music, and dance would be fundamental in communal gatherings, serving both entertainment and cultural education purposes.

Trade and Interactions

Given their location, the Sidelkino Culture might have engaged in trade with neighboring groups. They could play a pivotal role in facilitating interactions between European and Asian cultures. Trade items might include flint, furs, textiles, and metal objects.

Legacy and Influence

The legacy of the Sidelkino Culture would be seen in subsequent cultural developments, potentially influencing the cultural dynamics as the Proto-Uralic peoples emerged. The artistic styles, technological innovations, and spiritual beliefs of the Sidelkino might also leave an imprint on neighboring cultures, contributing to the vast cultural tapestry of prehistoric Eurasia.

In sum, the Sidelkino Culture, as an imaginative construct based on plausible prehistoric patterns, offers a fascinating glimpse into what might characterize a society in the region west of the Urals before the widespread influence of Uralic languages and cultures. It would be a society defined by its adaptability, cultural richness, and technological innovations, embodying the complexities of human development in the Neolithic to Bronze Age transition.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers

Authors Posth C, Yu H, Ghalichi A
Abstract

Modern humans have populated Europe for more than 45,000 years1,2. Our knowledge of the genetic relatedness and structure of ancient hunter-gatherers is however limited, owing to the scarceness and poor molecular preservation of human remains from that period3. Here we analyse 356 ancient hunter-gatherer genomes, including new genomic data for 116 individuals from 14 countries in western and central Eurasia, spanning between 35,000 and 5,000 years ago. We identify a genetic ancestry profile in individuals associated with Upper Palaeolithic Gravettian assemblages from western Europe that is distinct from contemporaneous groups related to this archaeological culture in central and southern Europe4, but resembles that of preceding individuals associated with the Aurignacian culture. This ancestry profile survived during the Last Glacial Maximum (25,000 to 19,000 years ago) in human populations from southwestern Europe associated with the Solutrean culture, and with the following Magdalenian culture that re-expanded northeastward after the Last Glacial Maximum. Conversely, we reveal a genetic turnover in southern Europe suggesting a local replacement of human groups around the time of the Last Glacial Maximum, accompanied by a north-to-south dispersal of populations associated with the Epigravettian culture. From at least 14,000 years ago, an ancestry related to this culture spread from the south across the rest of Europe, largely replacing the Magdalenian-associated gene pool. After a period of limited admixture that spanned the beginning of the Mesolithic, we find genetic interactions between western and eastern European hunter-gatherers, who were also characterized by marked differences in phenotypically relevant variants.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26