Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO200
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Neolithic era

NEO200
5797 BCE - 5633 BCE
Male
Kitoi Culture of Transbaikal Russia
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO200

Date Range

5797 BCE - 5633 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

C4

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Q-YP4010

Cultural Period

Kitoi Culture of Transbaikal Russia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Fofonovo (Buryatia, Kabansky District, Fofonovo Village)
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO200 5797 BCE - 5633 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Kitoi culture, dating from approximately 7600 to 5000 BP (Before Present), is a fascinating prehistoric culture located in the Transbaikal region of Siberia, Russia. This area, characterized by its vast open landscapes, forests, and rivers, has been a fertile ground for archaeological investigation. The Kitoi culture stands out as one of the early communities in this region that provides insights into the lives of Proto-Siberians, the ancient peoples that inhabited Siberia long before recorded history.

Geographical and Environmental Context

The Transbaikal region encompasses a large area east of Lake Baikal, featuring varied terrains including taiga forests, steppe regions, mountains, and river valleys. The Kitoi culture specifically thrived in areas that offered a rich variety of natural resources, facilitating a semi-nomadic lifestyle. The region experienced relatively harsh climatic conditions, with long, cold winters and short, mild summers, which influenced the lifestyle and survival strategies of the Kitoi people.

Socio-Economic Structure

The Kitoi culture is largely noted for its complex hunter-gatherer societies. The people were primarily engaged in fishing, hunting, and gathering, with a diet largely consisting of fish from the numerous rivers, supplemented by game animals and plant materials. The discovery of well-crafted fishing implements, such as harpoons and fish-hooks, at archaeological sites indicates the significance of aquatic resources.

Material Culture and Technology

Archaeological evidence reveals that the Kitoi people had a rich material culture that included tools and implements crafted from stone, bone, and antler. They utilized flint-knapping techniques to produce an array of stone tools, including blades and scrapers, which were essential for processing animal hides and other materials. Bone and antler were also commonly used to make tools, suggesting a sophisticated understanding of the material properties available to them.

Housing and Settlement Patterns

The Kitoi culture is characterized by semi-permanent settlements possibly due to the movement of animal herds and the seasonal availability of resources. Evidence suggests the Kitoi people constructed small semi-subterranean dwellings that provided shelter from the harsh Siberian climate. These structures were likely roofed with animal hides and supported by wooden frameworks, which insulated the inhabitants against the cold.

Mortuary Practices

One of the most striking aspects of the Kitoi culture is its burial practices. Cemeteries attributed to this culture have been unearthed, revealing extensive mortuary traditions. Burials often included the placement of bodies in extended positions, sometimes accompanied by grave goods that indicate social stratification and personal status. Items such as ornaments made from bone, teeth, and sometimes metal, suggest the beginnings of social complexity within the culture.

Spirituality and Symbolism

While direct evidence of the spiritual beliefs of the Kitoi people is scarce, the care with which they prepared their dead and the inclusion of grave goods implies a belief in an afterlife or spiritual continuity. Artifacts with possible symbolic or ritualistic significance, such as carved figurines or decorated objects, provide glimpses into their spiritual world.

Interaction and Cultural Influence

The Kitoi culture did not exist in isolation. There is evidence of interaction with contemporaneous cultures, seen in the exchange of materials and ideas. These interactions likely facilitated the development of advanced hunting techniques and toolmaking skills, contributing to their adaptability and resilience in a challenging environment.

Legacy and Importance

The study of the Kitoi culture offers valuable insights into the adaptation strategies of early human societies in Siberia. Their ability to thrive in harsh environments and develop complex social structures provides a crucial understanding of the ways in which human cultures evolve in response to their surroundings. As such, the Kitoi culture is an important focus for archaeologists seeking to unravel the history of ancient Siberian populations and their contributions to the broader narrative of human prehistory.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26