跳转到主内容
mtDNA · 母亲 lineage

A18

mtDNA Haplogroup A18

一个家族分支的参考简介 。 共享haplogroups 无法建立家庭关系或文化认同 。

参考简介

部门背景

mtDNA 谱系分支 A18 的历史背景

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup A18 is an intermediate subclade nested under the parent lineage AA1. Based on its phylogenetic position and the diversity observed in related A-lineages, A18 most plausibly arose in Northeast Asia during the early Holocene (roughly around 8–11 kya), a period when post-glacial re-expansion and local differentiation of maternal lineages occurred across the Amur–Siberian and adjacent East Asian regions. Because A18 is relatively rare in modern screening datasets, age estimates are provisional and depend on further complete mitogenome sampling.

Like other branches of macro-haplogroup A/AA, A18 likely derives from an older East Eurasian maternal substrate that expanded after the Last Glacial Maximum. Its presence as a discrete clade under AA1 suggests a localized founder effect or long-term low-frequency continuity in northern East Asian hunter-gatherer populations.

Subclades (if applicable)

At present A18 is considered an intermediate terminal clade in available reference trees (derived from AA1). If full mitogenomes reveal further internal structure, A18 may split into geographically informative subclades that track micro-regional expansions. Because published data are limited, specific named downstream subclades of A18 are not yet well characterized; targeted sequencing of complete mitochondrial genomes from Northeast Asian and Siberian populations would clarify substructure and time depth.

Geographical Distribution

A18 is recorded at low to moderate frequencies in northern East Asia and adjacent Siberian zones. Reported and inferred occurrences include:

  • Indigenous hunter-gatherer groups and modern descendants in the Amur River and Russian Far East area.
  • Certain Tungusic-speaking and other northern ethnic groups (low-frequency presence).
  • Occasional low-frequency detections in northern Han, Korean, and Japanese datasets, consistent with prehistoric gene flow along coastal and inland East Asian corridors.
  • Sparse, isolated occurrences reported in some Central Asian samples, likely reflecting historic movements and admixture rather than a primary origin there.

The overall pattern is one of localized northeastern concentration with sporadic peripheral presence, consistent with a lineage that persisted in northern refugia and dispersed only modestly during Holocene demographic events.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because A18 appears to be tied to northern East Asian maternal diversity, it is most relevant to studies of post-glacial hunter-gatherer populations of the Amur–Siberian region and their interactions with later Neolithic and Bronze Age groups. Potential cultural associations (based on geography and chronology) include:

  • Amur Neolithic / Early Holocene foragers: A18 may have been part of the maternal make-up of early Holocene hunter-gatherer communities in the Amur basin and nearby coastal regions.
  • Jomon-related coastal hunter-gatherers: Sporadic overlap in geographic range and time makes association with Jomon and other coastal forager groups possible but not primary; genetic links would need to be demonstrated by ancient DNA from securely dated contexts.
  • Later Bronze Age and historic admixture: Low-frequency dispersal into neighboring populations during Bronze Age and historic periods could explain scattered detections in Central and East Asian groups.

Overall, the cultural signal of A18 is that of a lineage tied primarily to northern forager populations with limited but detectable contributions to later East Asian population mixtures.

Conclusion

mtDNA A18 is a useful marker for reconstructing fine-scale maternal history in Northeast Asia and adjacent Siberia. Its rarity in modern datasets limits current resolution, but its phylogenetic placement under AA1 and its geographic distribution point to an early Holocene origin in the Amur–Siberian region with long-term local continuity and modest dispersal. Expanded sampling and complete mitogenome analyses, especially from ancient remains in Northeast Asia, are needed to refine the age, internal structure, and historical movements of A18.

关键点

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
参考简介

树形关系( N)

phylgenetic 上下文和子拼写

进化路径

沿已记录的上级分支追溯至 A18。年代为估计值,可能随参考数据更新而调整。

步骤 单倍群 年龄估计 考古时代 时间流逝 直系后裔 被测试的现代后裔 古代连接
1 A18 当前 ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 years 0 0 0
2 AA1 - - - 14 942 0
3 AA - - - 4 947 0
4 A ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 years 4 997 192
5 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 years 16 26,150 13
6 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 years 7 30,162 6
7 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
8 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
9 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
10 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
11 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
12 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 years 2 32,236 5

Subclades (0)

终端分支 -没有记录的子密钥

参考简介

哪里是这个世界

地理分布和现代存在

记录来源

Northeast Asia (Amur–Siberian region)

现代发行

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup A18 is found include:

  1. Indigenous Amur-region hunter-gatherer descendants and modern populations in the Russian Far East
  2. Tungusic-speaking groups of Northeast Asia (reported at low frequency)
  3. Northern East Asian populations (select northern Han, Korean, Japanese samples with occasional detections)
  4. Some Siberian populations (e.g., Yakut/Sakha and neighboring groups at low frequency)
  5. Isolated occurrences in Central Asian samples, likely due to later admixture
历史背景

分枝穿越时间

大致历史时间范围内的估计形成情况:周期标志提供了背景,并不意味着与特定文化的联系。

  1. ~10k 年前

    新石器革命

    农业开始,定居社区形成

  2. ~9k 年前

    Haplogroup A18

    此 mtDNA 分支的形成时间为推定值,日期和地点仅作参考。

    这个分支
  3. ~5k 年前

    青铜时代

    金属加工、书写和早期文明

  4. ~3k 年前

    铁器时代

    铁工具,扩大贸易网络

  5. ~2.5k 年前

    古典时代

    希腊和罗马文明蓬勃发展

  6. 现

    现日

    现代时代

参考简介

考古学背景

已记录的 mtDNA 分支 A18 考古关联

有记录的协会

这些标签描述与 A18 相关的参考样本所处的考古背景。仅凭这种关联,无法判断所有携带者都属于某种文化或沿同一路线迁徙。

Kitoi Kuenga Culture Lokomotiv Culture Ob River Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_N Russia_Novosibirsk_N-1 Selenge Culture Upper Yellow River Culture Yenisei Culture
文化任务基于古代DNA样本的考古背景,可能代表特定时期的区域协会.
参考简介

样本目录

单倍群 A18 的直接携带者 3 名

3 显示 ^ 3 匹配样本

Portraits是AI生成的插图,样本标签和加入ID识别参考记录.

纵向 样本 国家 大纪元 日期 文化 mtDNA 匹配
AI生成的示例性肖像 Selenge Late Medieval individual, Selenge. Karnikovyn Am, Mongolia (1,000-1,500 CE)
Sample ID: KRN002
Mongolia Mongolia Selenge LateMedieval 1000-1500 CE Selenge Culture A18 Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 Ancient Chinese Civilization individual, Qinghai province. Minhe County. Lajia village. Lajia site, China (2,050-1,850 BCE)
Sample ID: LJM14
China Late Neolithic Upper Yellow River, China 2050 BCE - 1850 BCE Upper Yellow River Culture A18 Direct
AI生成的示例性肖像 China Ln individual, Qinghai province. Minhe County. Lajia village. Lajia site, China (2,050-1,850 BCE)
Sample ID: LJM14
China Late Neolithic China 2050 BCE - 1850 BCE A18 Direct
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

古代世系证据地图

跟随母舰飞向这个分支 探索古代载体的发现地点

正在装入古老的观测...

标记是考古发现地点。一个破碎的连接器是连续分支之间一种不确定的、拟议中的地理过渡,辅以多个日期的观察;它不是一个准确的旅行路线、出生地或直接血统的证明。父系样本可能属于其他后代分支。在证据不足的地方,差距依然存在。样本日期与随机群形成日期不同。

参考简介

载体分布图

3 个古代 DNA 样本的地理分布,涵盖 A18 及其下游分支的携带者

直接承运人
时间段过滤器
所有时间段
显示全部样本
参考简介

时间分布

载体在考古时期的分布

参考简介

地理分布

按有记录的抽样国家计算,反映的是现有的参考选择,而不是人口频率。

参考简介

国家 × 大纪元发行

比较各国和考古时期记录的样本数量。选择一个人口密集的细胞来检查样本。

数据

数据证明( P)

来源信息和数据质量

上次更新 2026-06-14
信心分数 50/100
覆盖范围 Low

数据来源

分类、估计日期和地理背景反映了所记录的参考数据,随着证据的修订而可能发生变化,样本覆盖范围不均匀;所记录的地点和考古协会没有确定个人出身或文化特征。