Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I6699
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Romania in the Neolithic era

I6699
5292 BCE - 5000 BCE
Male
Starčevo-Körös-Criș Culture
Romania
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I6699

Date Range

5292 BCE - 5000 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

K1a2

Y-DNA Haplogroup

R-V88

Cultural Period

Starčevo-Körös-Criș Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Romania
Locality Teleor-3 (Teleorman County, Măgura)
Coordinates 44.0272, 25.3925
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I6699 5292 BCE - 5000 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture, often simply referred to as the Starčevo culture, represents one of the earliest Neolithic farming cultures in Southeastern Europe, flourishing between approximately 6200 and 4500 BCE. This culture marks a significant transition from hunter-gatherer societies to settled farming communities, heralding substantial changes in terms of socio-economic structures, technologies, and cultural practices.

Geographic Distribution

The Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture covered a broad expanse of the Balkan Peninsula and the Carpathian Basin, spreading through present-day Serbia, Hungary, Romania, Bosnia, Croatia, and Bulgaria. Named after key archaeological sites along major rivers such as the Tisa, Mures, Körös, and Criș, the culture is notably widespread, reflecting its adaptability to diverse environments ranging from lowland plains to river valleys.

Settlement and Architecture

Settlements of the Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture typically consisted of small villages, often situated near rivers or fertile floodplains, which offered rich alluvial soils ideal for early agriculture. These villages were usually comprised of semi-subterranean dwellings or simple above-ground structures built from a combination of wattle and daub, along with thatched roofs. Evidence suggests that these communities were relatively egalitarian, with little to moderate evidence of social stratification.

The houses were likely used for both residential purposes and storage of surplus crops and goods, indicating a sedentary lifestyle focused on agriculture and animal husbandry. The population size of these settlements varied, generally housing a few dozen to several hundred individuals.

Economy and Subsistence

The economy of the Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture was fundamentally based on agriculture and animal husbandry. People cultivated a variety of crops, including wheat, barley, lentils, peas, and flax. This agricultural practice was complemented by the domestication of animals such as cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats. Such domestication provided dairy products, meat, and hides, crucial for the community's subsistence and trade.

Hunting and foraging persisted, supplementing the diet with wild game and plant resources. Fishing was particularly important in settlements near rivers, providing a stable protein source.

Material Culture and Technology

The Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture is celebrated for its distinctive pottery, which is among the earliest examples found in Europe. Pottery was typically handmade and featured simple forms, including bowls, cups, and storage jars. Decoration was modest, with incised or painted geometric patterns, likely imbued with symbolic or ritual significance.

Lithic technology was still prominent, with tools like sickle blades, axes, and arrowheads fashioned from locally available stone materials. Groundstone tools, such as querns and grinders, were essential for processing grain.

Social and Cultural Practices

The social structure of the Starčevo-Körös-Criș communities appears to have been relatively simple, with little evidence of hierarchical social organization or monumental architecture. However, the presence of communal activities and shared spaces suggests cohesive community structures focused on mutual cooperation and resource sharing.

Ritual and spiritual practices are suggested by the presence of figurines, often representing human or animal forms, which may have held roles in religious or fertility rites. Burials from this culture provide insight into their beliefs about death and the afterlife, with individual interments typically found within village boundaries, suggesting a connection between the living and ancestral spirits.

Influence and Decline

The Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture played a pivotal role in disseminating Neolithic practices and agricultural technology across Europe. Its interaction with adjacent cultures facilitated the exchange of ideas and technologies, accelerating the Neolithic revolution in the region.

The decline of the Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture coincides with the emergence of more complex and regionally distinct Neolithic cultures in late 5th millennium BCE, such as the Vinča culture, which arose possibly through cultural innovation or the influx of new populations with advanced technological capabilities. The legacy of the Starčevo-Körös-Criș culture remains in its profound influence on the settlement patterns, agriculture, and socio-cultural practices that forged the path for subsequent European societies.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Social and genetic diversity in first farmers of central Europe

Authors Gelabert P, Bickle P, Hofmann D
Abstract

The Linearbandkeramik (LBK) Neolithic communities were the first to spread farming across large parts of Europe. We report genome-wide data for 250 individuals: 178 individuals from whole-cemetery surveys of the Alföld Linearbankeramik Culture eastern LBK site of Polgár-Ferenci-hát, the western LBK site of Nitra Horné Krškany and the western LBK settlement and massacre site of Asparn-Schletz, as well as 48 LBK individuals from 16 other sites and 24 earlier Körös and Starčevo individuals from 17 more sites. Here we show a systematically higher percentage of western hunter-gatherer ancestry in eastern than in western LBK sites, showing that these two distinct LBK groups had different genetic trajectories. We find evidence for patrilocality, with more structure across sites in the male than in the female lines and a higher rate of within-site relatives for males. At Asparn-Schletz we find almost no relatives, showing that the massacred individuals were from a large population, not a small community.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27