Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of DA357
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Early Neolithic era

DA357
5981 BCE - 5723 BCE
Male
Eneolithic Lokomotiv, Russia
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

DA357

Date Range

5981 BCE - 5723 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

A-a1

Y-DNA Haplogroup

C-F3918

Cultural Period

Eneolithic Lokomotiv, Russia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Lokomotiv
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

DA357 5981 BCE - 5723 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Eneolithic Lokomotiv culture is a significant archaeological phenomenon located in the region of Siberia, specifically near the Angara River and the city of Irkutsk in modern-day Russia. This culture is part of the broader Eneolithic period, which is often referred to as the Copper Age, bridging the gap between the Neolithic and the Bronze Age. The Lokomotiv culture represents a key phase in the development of early societies in this region, offering valuable insights into the lifestyles, technologies, and social structures of these prehistoric peoples.

Timeframe and Geography

The Eneolithic period in which the Lokomotiv culture thrived is generally dated between the 4th and 3rd millennia BCE. The geographical setting of the Lokomotiv culture includes the forest-steppe zones of the Eastern Siberia, particularly around the areas flanking the Angara River. This location provided a mix of resources, from forested areas rich in game to rivers abundant with fish, which supported the subsistence strategies of the community.

Archaeological Discoveries

The site known as Lokomotiv is one of the most prominent and best-studied associated with this culture. Discovered in the mid-20th century, this site yielded an extensive array of artifacts, including pottery, tools, and burial sites. These discoveries have been instrumental in constructing a picture of life during this period.

  • Burials: The Lokomotiv site is renowned for its burial complex, which includes several kurgans (burial mounds). These burials provide critical information about the social and spiritual aspects of the culture. The graves often contain grave goods, such as tools, pottery, and ornaments, suggesting a belief in an afterlife and illustrating social stratification within the community.

  • Pottery: The pottery from this culture is characterized by its simple, utilitarian forms, often decorated with cord-impressed designs. These ceramics are essential for dating the site and understanding the cultural influences interacting with the Lokomotiv community.

  • Tools and Artifacts: Stone and bone tools found at Lokomotiv indicate a society skilled in hunting, fishing, and gathering. The presence of copper artifacts, although not abundant, signifies the transition into the use of metal and the technological advancements of the Eneolithic period.

Economy and Subsistence

The Lokomotiv culture primarily engaged in a mixed economy that included hunting, fishing, and foraging. The diverse resources of the Siberian taiga and river systems would have provided ample opportunities for sustenance. The archaeological record suggests the predominance of hunting and fishing, with animals like deer, elk, and various fish species being central to their diet.

Cultural and Social Structure

The social structure of the Lokomotiv culture, as inferred from burial practices, appears to have been complex, possibly with a hierarchy or differing social statuses. The differentiation in grave goods points to varying statuses among individuals, suggesting that leaders or individuals with specific roles may have held greater importance within the community.

Proto-Indo-European Connections

While it is challenging to draw direct links to Proto-Indo-European populations, the Lokomotiv culture is sometimes discussed within broader theories regarding the movements and interactions of prehistoric Eurasian populations. Some researchers attempt to trace cultural or technological exchanges across vast distances that might have connected Siberian groups with those migrating across the steppe regions, contributing to the diffusion of certain cultural traits that are later considered Proto-Indo-European.

Significance

The significance of the Lokomotiv culture lies in its position within the cultural and technological evolution of prehistoric Siberia. It reflects an emergent social complexity and interaction with broader technological trends, such as metal use. The Lokomotiv culture provides an essential piece in the puzzle of understanding the prehistoric populations of Siberia and their links to larger prehistoric migrations and cultural transformations across Eurasia.

In summary, the Eneolithic Lokomotiv culture offers a fascinating glimpse into a prehistoric society on the cusp of significant technological and social change. Its archaeological remains help illustrate the life, economy, and beliefs of a people who lived several millennia ago in the challenging yet resource-rich landscapes of Siberia.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia

Authors de Barros Damgaard P, Martiniano R, Kamm J
Abstract

The Yamnaya expansions from the western steppe into Europe and Asia during the Early Bronze Age (~3000 BCE) are believed to have brought with them Indo-European languages and possibly horse husbandry. We analyzed 74 ancient whole-genome sequences from across Inner Asia and Anatolia and show that the Botai people associated with the earliest horse husbandry derived from a hunter-gatherer population deeply diverged from the Yamnaya. Our results also suggest distinct migrations bringing West Eurasian ancestry into South Asia before and after, but not at the time of, Yamnaya culture. We find no evidence of steppe ancestry in Bronze Age Anatolia from when Indo-European languages are attested there. Thus, in contrast to Europe, Early Bronze Age Yamnaya-related migrations had limited direct genetic impact in Asia.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26