Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I25523
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Hungary in the Late Bronze Age to Iron Age era

I25523
1200 BCE - 800 BCE
Male
The Transition to Iron Age in Hungary
Hungary
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I25523

Date Range

1200 BCE - 800 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

H2a

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Cultural Period

The Transition to Iron Age in Hungary

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Hungary
Locality Somogy county. Kútvölgyi-dűlő. Zamárdi (sites 56 and 89)
Coordinates 46.8759, 17.9673
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I25523 1200 BCE - 800 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The transition to the Iron Age in Hungary, specifically within the context of the Urnfield Culture, represents a fascinating period of socio-economic transformation and cultural development. This era, generally dating from around 1300 to 800 BCE, marks the shift from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age, characterized by significant advancements in metallurgy, changes in settlement patterns, and evolving social structures.

Metallurgical Advancements

The introduction of iron metallurgy was a pivotal aspect of this period. While bronze—the alloy of copper and tin—continued to be used for weapons and tools, iron began to play a more significant role due to its abundance and the relative ease of sourcing iron ore compared to the rarer and geographically scattered tin deposits. The technology associated with processing iron ore, smelting in bloomery furnaces, and producing wrought iron tools, weapons, and everyday items represented revolutionary advancements. Although initially less sophisticated compared to Bronze Age metallurgy, the iron tools were durable and accessible, promoting widespread utility.

Cultural Practices and Burial Rites

The Urnfield Culture is named for its distinctive burial rites, where the remains of the deceased were cremated, and ashes placed into urns. These urns, often accompanied by grave goods such as pottery, tools, and personal ornaments, were buried in large cemeteries. This practice indicated a shift from inhumation burials seen in the earlier Tumulus Culture. The emphasis on urn burials signifies not just a change in funerary customs but also possibly evolving spiritual or religious beliefs about death and the afterlife.

Settlement Patterns and Economy

During this transition, there was a noticeable shift in settlement patterns. While some communities continued to live in hillforts—a reflection of the need for defense and centralized control—others expanded into the plains. This expansion could also indicate better agricultural techniques and more effective use of resources. The Iron Age settlers in Hungary practiced mixed farming, growing crops like wheat and barley and raising livestock, including cattle, pigs, and goats.

The impact of improved tools made from iron accelerated agriculture and husbandry, facilitating surplus production that could have supported population growth and urbanization. Furthermore, the development of new trade networks bolstered by iron products looked beyond Hungary's immediate geographic region, suggesting an exchange not only of goods but also of ideas and technologies.

Social and Political Structures

In terms of social organization, the transition to the Iron Age involved increasingly hierarchical structures. Weapons and items made from iron became symbols of status and power, thus likely entrenching social stratification. Chiefs or tribal leaders may have strengthened their influence, using control over iron production and distribution as leverage.

The period also shows evidence of evolving political entities and warriors' role as an upper societal tier, often signified by burials with elaborate grave goods. This stratification likely played a part in the later emergence of more complex societal structures that would come to characterize the European Iron Age extensively.

Archaeological Evidence

Archaeologically, this period in Hungary is well-documented through findings from numerous sites. Artifacts such as ceramics, tools, and armaments reflect both utilitarian and aesthetic attributes, providing a glimpse into the daily life and artistic expressions of the time. The presence of diverse burial sites aids in understanding the societal beliefs and underscores the importance of community and tradition during the era.

Conclusion

The transition to the Iron Age in Hungary, particularly through the lens of the Urnfield Culture, marks a significant chapter in prehistoric Europe’s narrative. It is a period of technological innovation, evolving cultural practices, and significant societal transformation. Through archaeological findings, historians and archaeologists continue to uncover the complex tapestry of life during this transformative era, shedding light on the foundational processes that led to the sophisticated societies of the European Iron Age.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Large-scale migration into Britain during the Middle to Late Bronze Age

Authors Patterson N, Isakov M, Booth T
Abstract

Present-day people from England and Wales have more ancestry derived from early European farmers (EEF) than did people of the Early Bronze Age1. To understand this, here we generated genome-wide data from 793 individuals, increasing data from the Middle to the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age in Britain by 12-fold, and western and central Europe by 3.5-fold. Between 1000 and 875 BC, EEF ancestry increased in southern Britain (England and Wales) but not northern Britain (Scotland) due to incorporation of migrants who arrived at this time and over previous centuries, and who were genetically most similar to ancient individuals from France. These migrants contributed about half the ancestry of people of England and Wales from the Iron Age, thereby creating a plausible vector for the spread of early Celtic languages into Britain. These patterns are part of a broader trend of EEF ancestry becoming more similar across central and western Europe in the Middle to the Late Bronze Age, coincident with archaeological evidence of intensified cultural exchange2-6. There was comparatively less gene flow from continental Europe during the Iron Age, and the independent genetic trajectory in Britain is also reflected in the rise of the allele conferring lactase persistence to approximately 50% by this time compared to approximately 7% in central Europe where it rose rapidly in frequency only a millennium later. This suggests that dairy products were used in qualitatively different ways in Britain and in central Europe over this period.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27