Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I16437
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in United Kingdom in the Middle Neolithic era

I16437
4241 BCE - 4050 BCE
Female
Middle Neolithic Channel Islands
United Kingdom
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I16437

Date Range

4241 BCE - 4050 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

K1b1a1

Cultural Period

Middle Neolithic Channel Islands

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country United Kingdom
Locality Channel Islands. Guernsey. Vale. Le Déhus
Coordinates 49.4972, -2.5065
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I16437 4241 BCE - 4050 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Middle Neolithic period in the Channel Islands represents a fascinating and significant era in the prehistoric development of these islands, located off the Normandy coast in the English Channel. This period, roughly spanning from 4000 to 3000 BCE, was marked by profound changes in social structures, subsistence strategies, and material culture, reflective of broader Neolithic trends in Western Europe. The Channel Islands, comprising notable islands like Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney, and Sark, provide a unique insight into the adaptation and evolution of Neolithic communities in a maritime environment.

Geography and Environment

The Channel Islands during the Middle Neolithic were characterized by a varied and resource-rich environment, offering fertile land, abundant marine resources, and a temperate climate. The post-Ice Age rising sea levels had separated the islands from the continental mainland, establishing distinct biogeographical zones. This isolation influenced both the cultural development and ecological adaptations of Neolithic inhabitants.

Subsistence and Economy

The economy of the Middle Neolithic communities in the Channel Islands was primarily based on mixed farming, with evidence of cereal cultivation and animal husbandry. Archaeobotanical data indicates the cultivation of crops such as wheat and barley, while faunal remains suggest the presence of domesticated animals including cattle, sheep, and pigs. The islanders also exploited marine resources; shell middens and fish bones found at archaeological sites point to a well-developed practice of fishing and shellfish gathering.

Material Culture

The material culture of the Middle Neolithic Channel Islands reflects a blend of indigenous innovation and external influences from the continental Neolithic cultures. Pottery from this period often exhibits distinct styles, including impressed and incised decorations. These artifacts indicate both local production and potential exchanges with nearby mainland communities.

Lithic technology saw advancements with the production of polished stone tools, such as axes and adzes, which were essential for agricultural and woodworking tasks. The presence of imported flint, not naturally found on the islands, signifies established trade networks with continental regions.

Social Structure and Settlement

Settlements during the Middle Neolithic were typically small, consisting of clusters of roundhouses or oval structures, suggesting a degree of social organization and community living. The distribution of these sites across the islands indicates a preference for strategically advantageous positions, offering access to both arable land and marine resources.

The construction of megalithic structures, such as dolmens and passage graves, is a hallmark of this era, reflecting complex social and ceremonial practices. These monuments, like the La Hougue Bie on Jersey and the Castel Mead on Guernsey, imply the existence of hierarchies or cooperative social systems for organizing labor and resources.

Rituals and Beliefs

The Neolithic people of the Channel Islands likely practiced animistic or shamanistic religions, with a strong emphasis on ancestor worship and the veneration of natural elements. Megalithic tombs and ceremonial sites suggest ritualistic undertakings, possibly linked to cosmological beliefs and views on life, death, and the afterlife.

Ceremonial and funerary practices were likely rich in symbolism, with grave goods and offerings pointing to beliefs in an existence beyond death. These practices would have been central to communal identity, reinforcing social norms and shared values.

External Influences and Connectivity

Despite their geographical separation, the Channel Islands maintained connections with broader Neolithic Europe. Goods, ideas, and possibly people moved through maritime routes, integrating the islands into wider cultural and economic networks. This connectivity allowed for the exchange of artistic, technological, and ideological innovations, evident in the hybrid nature of the material culture and architectural forms.

Conclusion

The Middle Neolithic period in the Channel Islands represents a dynamic chapter in the region's prehistoric narrative. Characterized by a blend of indigenous development and external influences, this era reflects the adaptability and ingenuity of its communities in the face of environmental and social challenges. With its rich archaeological record, the Channel Islands continue to provide invaluable insights into the complexities of Neolithic life in a unique island context.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I16437 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Neolithic Farmers 64.2%
European Hunter-Gatherers 23.6%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 12.1%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Europe 96.6%
Southern European 96.6%
Iberian 57.6%
Sardinian 29.7%
Italian 9.3%
Asia 3.4%
Northern West Asian 3.4%
Cypriot 3.4%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in United Kingdom in the Middle Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Sardinian
1.9719
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Large-scale migration into Britain during the Middle to Late Bronze Age

Authors Patterson N, Isakov M, Booth T
Abstract

Present-day people from England and Wales have more ancestry derived from early European farmers (EEF) than did people of the Early Bronze Age1. To understand this, here we generated genome-wide data from 793 individuals, increasing data from the Middle to the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age in Britain by 12-fold, and western and central Europe by 3.5-fold. Between 1000 and 875 BC, EEF ancestry increased in southern Britain (England and Wales) but not northern Britain (Scotland) due to incorporation of migrants who arrived at this time and over previous centuries, and who were genetically most similar to ancient individuals from France. These migrants contributed about half the ancestry of people of England and Wales from the Iron Age, thereby creating a plausible vector for the spread of early Celtic languages into Britain. These patterns are part of a broader trend of EEF ancestry becoming more similar across central and western Europe in the Middle to the Late Bronze Age, coincident with archaeological evidence of intensified cultural exchange2-6. There was comparatively less gene flow from continental Europe during the Iron Age, and the independent genetic trajectory in Britain is also reflected in the rise of the allele conferring lactase persistence to approximately 50% by this time compared to approximately 7% in central Europe where it rose rapidly in frequency only a millennium later. This suggests that dairy products were used in qualitatively different ways in Britain and in central Europe over this period.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I16437 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I16437,0.11934428,0.16152898,0.02338482,-0.04460294,0.05801808,-0.0221874,-0.00233278,0.00556768,0.03980972,0.07196398,-0.00375742,0.01497616,-0.02655026,-0.01476544,-0.01158276,0.00491192,0.01413798,-0.00017918,-0.00054114,-0.00408406,-0.00058698,0.00423306,-0.01226944,-0.01966354,0.00438234
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26