Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Romania in the Neolithic era

A woman buried in Romania during the Iclod Culture

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

rom046
4711 BCE - 4546 BCE
Female
Romania
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

rom046

Date Range

4711 BCE - 4546 BCE

Cultural Period

Iclod Culture

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

N1a1a1a3

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N/A (Female)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Romania
Locality village Iclod, Cluj county
Coordinates 46.7441, 23.4840
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

rom046 4711 BCE - 4546 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Iclod Culture is a lesser-known but fascinating Neolithic culture that emerged during the Danubian era, primarily situated around the Upper Danube basin in Central Europe. This culture, which thrived approximately between 5000 and 4500 BCE, is a part of the broader Neolithic Revolution period, characterized by the rapid spread of agriculture, sedentism, and significant technological advancements.

Geographic Setting

The Iclod Culture was centered in the Pannonian Basin, which includes present-day Hungary, Romania, Serbia, and Austria. This area is defined by its fertile plains, river systems, and temperate climate, making it an ideal location for early agricultural communities. The Danube River, Europe's second-longest river, provided a crucial conduit for trade, travel, and cultural exchange, further enhancing the growth and prosperity of the Iclod Culture.

Agricultural Practices

The Iclod Culture was built on an agricultural foundation, like many other Neolithic societies. This era saw significant advancements in farming technology. The introduction of polished stone tools, such as sickles and grinding stones, facilitated the efficient cultivation and harvesting of crops. The people of the Iclod Culture primarily grew cereals such as wheat and barley, along with pulses like lentils and peas. They also engaged in animal husbandry, raising domesticated animals like cattle, sheep, and goats, which provided not only meat but also milk, wool, and hides.

Settlement Patterns

The Iclod communities were predominantly composed of small to medium-sized settlements, often situated on elevated terrains or near riverbanks to minimize the risk of flooding. The villages typically consisted of longhouses built using local materials like timber, clay, and straw. These structures served both as family dwellings and storage areas for surplus goods. The settlement pattern reflects a tightly-knit community with kinship ties central to social organization.

Social Structure and Organization

The social structure of the Iclod Culture remains an area ripe for research, but archaeological evidence suggests a relatively egalitarian society. There is little evidence of pronounced social stratification, such as palaces or elaborate burials indicating a hierarchical elite. Instead, the culture likely functioned on a tribal basis, with decisions made by consensus or through the leadership of elders or respected individuals.

Material Culture

The material remains of the Iclod Culture reveal a sophisticated artistic expression. Pottery was a significant aspect of their material culture, often decorated with geometric patterns, lines, and spirals—reflective of aesthetic values and possibly symbolic meanings. Stone tools crafted with meticulous precision demonstrate their technological prowess, while clay figurines suggest a possible ritualistic or religious component to their culture. The existence of personal adornments, such as beads made from bone and shell, indicates an appreciation for personal decoration and status markers.

Trade and Economy

Situated along the Danube, the Iclod Culture engaged in trade with neighboring communities and cultural groups. The exchange network facilitated the movement of goods like obsidian, flint, and raw materials not locally available. Trade played a crucial role in cultural interaction, allowing for the exchange of ideas, technologies, and cultural practices, contributing to the dynamic nature of the Iclod Culture.

Religious Beliefs and Practices

Although concrete evidence of the specific religious beliefs of the Iclod people is sparse, the presence of figurines and symbolic pottery motifs suggests a spiritual component. These artifacts, along with burial practices involving grave goods, imply a belief in an afterlife or spiritual realm. Shamans or spiritual leaders might have held significant roles within the community, conducting rituals to ensure successful harvests or protection from adverse forces.

Conclusion

The Iclod Culture represents an intriguing chapter in the broader narrative of Neolithic Europe. Through the remnants of their settlements, agricultural practices, and material culture, they demonstrate a society that was innovative, interconnected, and rich in cultural expression. The Iclod Culture adds depth to our understanding of the Neolithic era, highlighting the regional variations and complexities of early agrarian societies in the Danubian basin.

Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
buk002 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Negrileşti 5612 BCE Negrilești (Galati, Negrilești), Romania View
buk003 Starčevo-Criș Culture of Grădinile 5801 BCE Grădinile, Romania View
buk004 Gumelnița Culture 4045 BCE Gumelnița (Călărași, Oltenita), Romania View
buk010 Sălcuța Culture 5548 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk012 Sălcuța Culture 5624 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk013 Sălcuța Culture 5557 BCE Gârlești (Dolj County, Craiova), Romania View
buk018 Boian Culture 4931 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk019 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk022 Boian Culture 4984 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk023 Boian Culture 4938 BCE Curătești, Romania View
buk029 Boian Culture 4715 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk033 Boian Culture 4721 BCE Căscioarele, Romania View
buk040 Boian Culture 5204 BCE Sultana Valea (Călărași, Manasteria), Romania View
lbk101 Early Linear Pottery Culture of Ludwinowo 4350 BCE Ludwinowo-6 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk102 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk104 Eastern Linear Pottery Culture of Kruszyn 4350 BCE Kruszyn-13 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Włocławek), Poland View
lbk138 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4330 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz120 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz121 Late Lengyel Culture from Krusza Zamkowa 4333 BCE Krusza Zamkowa-3 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz177 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 4152 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz236 Late Neolithic Lengyel Culture of Racot 4311 BCE Racot (Greater Poland Province, Kościan), Poland View
poz252 Late Lengyel Culture from Siniarzewo 4531 BCE Siniarzewo-1 (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Aleksandrów County, Zakrzewo), Poland View
poz264 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3956 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz275 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3954 BCE Książnice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Busko County, Pacanów), Poland View
poz297 Komornica Culture 5621 BCE Łojewo (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province, Inowrocław), Poland View
poz375 Lublin-Volhynian Culture 3951 BCE Bronocice (Świętokrzyskie Province, Pińczów County, Działoszyce), Poland View
poz503 Kamienskie Culture Mesolithic 6814 BCE Kamienskie (Warmian-Masurian Province, Pisz County, Orzysz), Poland View
rom011 Iclod Culture 4836 BCE Iclod (Cluj, Iclod), Romania View
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
rom047 Decea Mureșului Culture 4343 BCE village Decea Mureșului, Alba county, Romania View
rom057_rom058 Starčevo-Criș Culture 5623 BCE village Baciu, Cluj county, Romania View
rom061 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 7584 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
rom066 Mesolithic Iron Gates, Romania 6641 BCE Ostrovul-Corbului (Mehedinți County, Hinova), Romania View
ukr005 Neolithic Ukraine 5471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr033 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4681 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr040 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4442 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr087 Neolithic Ukraine 5356 BCE Vasylivka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Vasylivka District, Vasylivska municipality), Ukraine View
ukr102 Mesolithic Ukraine 6471 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr104 Serednii Stih culture 3701 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr108 Mesolithic Ukraine 6066 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr111 Neolithic Ukraine 4834 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr112 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr113 Neolithic Ukraine 4836 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr116 Serednii Stih culture 4446 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr117 Neolithic Ukraine 5304 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr123 Serednii Stih culture 4342 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr125 Ukrainian Epipaleolithic-Mesolithic Culture 8708 BCE Deriivka (Kirovohrad Oblast, Oleksandriia District), Ukraine View
ukr144 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 5209 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr147 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4784 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr149 Neolithic Nikolske Culture 4602 BCE Nikol’ske, Ukraine View
ukr158 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5314 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr159 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5210 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr160 Yasinovatka Culture 5357 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr161 Neolithic Yasinovatka Culture 5209 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
ukr162 Yasinovatka Culture 4784 BCE Yasynuvatka (Zaporizhia Oblast, Zaporizhia District, Petro-Mykhailivka municipality), Ukraine View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
rom046 Iclod Culture 4711 BCE village Iclod, Cluj county, Romania View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Genetic continuity, isolation, and gene flow in Stone Age Central and Eastern Europe

Authors Mattila TM, Svensson EM, Juras A, Günther T, Kashuba N et al.
Abstract

The genomic landscape of Stone Age Europe was shaped by multiple migratory waves and population replacements, but different regions do not all show similar patterns. To refine our understanding of the population dynamics before and after the dawn of the Neolithic, we generated and analyzed genomic sequence data from human remains of 56 individuals from the Mesolithic, Neolithic, and Eneolithic across Central and Eastern Europe. We found that Mesolithic European populations formed a geographically widespread isolation-by-distance zone ranging from Central Europe to Siberia, which was already established 10,000 years ago. We found contrasting patterns of population continuity during the Neolithic transition: people around the lower Dnipro Valley region, Ukraine, showed continuity over 4000 years, from the Mesolithic to the end of the Neolithic, in contrast to almost all other parts of Europe where population turnover drove this cultural change, including vast areas of Central Europe and around the Danube River.

Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 12