Keatley Creek: housepits, food storage, and social interpretation - History, Government, Language, and Sources

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Great Basin and Columbia Plateau Worlds: Lakes, Rivers, and Living Homelands
Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) · Source-reviewed profile

Keatley Creek: housepits, food storage, and social interpretation

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

The first volume examines dating and deposit formation before interpreting household activities. The second volume compares food use, architecture and social organization; inequality models remain interpretations rather than transparent records of offices.

Household archaeology and social-model context Late Holocene housepit occupations; feature-specific dates and research histories distinguished Housepit floors, plant and animal remains, stone assemblages and depositional studies Lillooet, British Columbia, Canada (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, cave-entrance, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, hunting, gathering, farming, fishing, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting, fishing or travel permission is implied.
Overview

Caves, wetlands, households, rivers, and the evidence

Basin, plateau, lake, river, and neighboring connections

Lillooet, British Columbia, Canada is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state.

Political organization and community scale

House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state. Keatley Creek house-size, hierarchy and abandonment models are interpretations; charcoal dates, reused floors and later digital editions require separate chronologies.

Later transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Archaeological horizons cannot assign every resident a language; St’át’imc living heritage has authority beyond archaeological models. Events after 1800 CE and modern research, reconstruction and stewardship are dated separately from the main historical context.

Site formation The first volume examines dating and deposit formation before interpreting household activities.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Social models The second volume compares food use, architecture and social organization; inequality models remain interpretations rather than transparent records of offices.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Research sampling The third volume reports excavation and artifact evidence, making clear that examined areas are a sample of a larger settlement.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
Historical sequence

A concise, sourced timeline

These milestones are orientation points, not a complete history.

  1. Winter-house contexts

    Successive housepit deposits support household-scale study, not one occupation date for every structure.

    [S1]

  2. Floors and reuse

    Building and depositional histories complicate comparisons between houses.

    [S1]

  3. Formation and social syntheses

    The first two volumes distinguish evidence formation from socioeconomic reconstruction.

    [S2]

  4. Excavation record

    The third volume publishes the sampled excavation and artifact evidence.

    [S3]
Culture and language

Foodways, fiber work, farming, storage, and household labor

Languages named in this profile

  • Archaeological horizons cannot assign every resident a language; St’át’imc living heritage has authority beyond archaeological models.

Language family: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Housepit floors, plant and animal remains, stone assemblages and depositional studies.

House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state.

Keatley Creek house-size, hierarchy and abandonment models are interpretations; charcoal dates, reused floors and later digital editions require separate chronologies.

No artifact, rock-art, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

AI research guide

Ask about this reviewed profile

The guide can explain and connect facts already present on this page. It cannot search the open web, establish identity or citizenship, or evaluate ancestry and genetic information.

Grounded in approved profile content Citations use the source IDs below No account or DNA context

AI-generated interpretation of genetic similarity, not proof of ancestry. Informational only, not professional advice.

Read full notice

Before you continue: the analysis you are about to generate is produced by an AI model. AI output can be incomplete, inaccurate, or simply wrong. It describes statistical genetic similarity to reference populations and is not proof of ancestry, ethnicity, identity, or descent. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only, and is not medical, diagnostic, genealogical, legal, or other professional advice. Do not rely on it to make health, financial, legal, or family decisions. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, DNA Genics, S.L. accepts no liability for any loss or decision arising from your use of this AI output.

Do not enter names, contact details, family-tree information, account or kit identifiers, or genetic data.

Evidence register

Sources used for this page

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    A Brief History of CTUIR

    Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute: public exhibition introduction

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  3. C3

    Expanding Paleoindian Diet Breadth: Paleoethnobotany of Connley Cave 5, Oregon, USA

    Katelyn N. McDonough, Jaime L. Kennedy, Richard L. Rosencrance, Justin A. Holcomb, Dennis L. Jenkins and Kathryn Puseman; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022

  4. C4

    Return to Fort Rock Cave: Assessing the Site's Potential to Contribute to Ongoing Debates About How and When Humans Colonized the Great Basin

    Thomas J. Connolly and colleagues; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2017

  5. C5

    Xwísten Community Profile

    Xwísten, Bridge River Indian Band · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2014 web edition

  6. C6

    Introduction Lesson: Syilx History

    Okanagan Nation Alliance, Syilx 101 · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    History and Archaeology

    Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  8. C8

    Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Typology and Chronology Across the Great Basin

    Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resource Series; Bryan Hockett and collaborators · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022-12-21 institutional record

  9. S1

    The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume I: Taphonomy

    Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2000; digital edition 2017

  10. S2

    The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume II: Socioeconomy

    Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2000; digital edition 2017

  11. S3

    The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume III: Excavations and Artifacts

    Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2004; digital edition 2017

Sources and names remain the property of their respective publishers and communities. Their inclusion is for citation and education; it does not imply endorsement of DNAGENICS. Summaries are original editorial paraphrases and should be checked against the linked source for important use.

Editorial review: October 20, 2026

Continue exploring
Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) Celilo: river foodways, exchange, and living communities Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. Read profile Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) Kettle Falls: Upper Columbia gathering and later disruption Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. Read profile Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) Lind Coulee: upland work and a revisited research archive Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented. Read profile
Use code for 35% off • Expires Nov 01