Great Basin and Columbia Plateau Worlds: Lakes, Rivers, and Living Homelands
Columbia Plateau and neighboring inland contexts (orientation only) · Profil avec revue des sources

Keatley Creek: housepits, food storage, and social interpretation

Reviewed community and place names are preserved where supported; no otherwise unknown ancient self-designation is invented.

The first volume examines dating and deposit formation before interpreting household activities. The second volume compares food use, architecture and social organization; inequality models remain interpretations rather than transparent records of offices.

Household archaeology and social-model context Late Holocene housepit occupations; feature-specific dates and research histories distinguished Housepit floors, plant and animal remains, stone assemblages and depositional studies Lillooet, British Columbia, Canada (orientation only): approximate public-town or distant institutional orientation, not an excavation, burial, sacred-site, cave-entrance, private compound or vulnerable-deposit location; never a territorial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural, political, religious, sovereignty, hunting, gathering, farming, fishing, water-rights or route boundary. The orientation may be far from the archaeological context. No access, collecting, fishing or travel permission is implied.
Aperçu

Cuevas, zones humides, foyers, fleuves et éléments probants

Connexions entre cuencas, plateaux, lacs, fleuves et régions voisines

Lillooet, British Columbia, Canada is a modern orientation, not an ancient capital or boundary. House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state.

Organisation politique et échelle communautaire

House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state. Keatley Creek house-size, hierarchy and abandonment models are interpretations; charcoal dates, reused floors and later digital editions require separate chronologies.

Transformation ultérieure, patrimoine vivant et réception moderne

Living communities and heritage institutions retain their own authority; this atlas cannot establish identity, ancestry, descent, recognition or membership. Archaeological horizons cannot assign every resident a language; St’át’imc living heritage has authority beyond archaeological models. Events after 1800 CE and modern research, reconstruction and stewardship are dated separately from the main historical context.

Site formation The first volume examines dating and deposit formation before interpreting household activities.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S1]
Social models The second volume compares food use, architecture and social organization; inequality models remain interpretations rather than transparent records of offices.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S2]
Research sampling The third volume reports excavation and artifact evidence, making clear that examined areas are a sample of a larger settlement.

Brief DNAGENICS AI-assisted paraphrase of registered evidence, not author or community endorsement. Retain chronological, sampling and interpretive limits.

Source review: 2026-10-20 [S3]
Séquence historique

Uma cronologia breve e documentada

Ces repères servent d'orientation et ne constituent pas une histoire complète.

  1. Winter-house contexts

    Successive housepit deposits support household-scale study, not one occupation date for every structure.

  2. Floors and reuse

    Building and depositional histories complicate comparisons between houses.

  3. Formation and social syntheses

    The first two volumes distinguish evidence formation from socioeconomic reconstruction.

  4. Excavation record

    The third volume publishes the sampled excavation and artifact evidence.

Culture et langue

Pratiques alimentaires, travail avec fibres, agriculture, stockage et travail domestique

Langues mentionnées dans ce profil

  • Archaeological horizons cannot assign every resident a language; St’át’imc living heritage has authority beyond archaeological models.

Famille linguistique: Language, material classification, political allegiance, residence and living identity are distinct; this record does not classify every ancient speaker.

Research focus: Housepit floors, plant and animal remains, stone assemblages and depositional studies.

House-size variation and storage support social questions, not an unquestioned census of chiefs or proof of one Plateau state.

Keatley Creek house-size, hierarchy and abandonment models are interpretations; charcoal dates, reused floors and later digital editions require separate chronologies.

No artifact, rock-art, sacred-site, burial or human-remains imagery or restricted knowledge is reproduced.

DNAGENICS provides AI-assisted, source-checked educational paraphrases. Cited authors, institutions and communities did not author or endorse this atlas. Public availability does not establish cultural consent or permission to reproduce objects, sacred knowledge or human remains. No imagery is reproduced. Specialist and community review is recommended; use the website contact channel for corrections, rights concerns or removal requests.

Guide de recherche IA

Poser une question sur ce profil vérifié

Le guide peut expliquer et relier les faits déjà présents sur cette page. Il ne peut pas interroger le web ouvert, établir une identité ou une citoyenneté, ni évaluer une ascendance ou une information génétique.

Ancré dans le contenu approuvé du profil Les citations utilisent les identifiants de sources ci-dessous Aucun contexte de compte ni d'ADN

N'introduisez pas de noms, coordonnées, informations d'arbre généalogique, identifiants de compte ou de kit, ni de données génétiques.

Registre des preuves

Sources utilisées pour cette page

Prefer Indigenous governments, museums, heritage organizations, accountable field projects and public heritage institutions. Give source title, author or organization, date and stable link. Brief summaries are DNAGENICS AI-assisted interpretations, not author or community endorsement, reproduction permission or community review.

  1. C1

    A Brief History of CTUIR

    Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  2. C2

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute: public exhibition introduction

    Tamástslikt Cultural Institute, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  3. C3

    Expanding Paleoindian Diet Breadth: Paleoethnobotany of Connley Cave 5, Oregon, USA

    Katelyn N. McDonough, Jaime L. Kennedy, Richard L. Rosencrance, Justin A. Holcomb, Dennis L. Jenkins and Kathryn Puseman; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022

  4. C4

    Return to Fort Rock Cave: Assessing the Site's Potential to Contribute to Ongoing Debates About How and When Humans Colonized the Great Basin

    Thomas J. Connolly and colleagues; American Antiquity · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2017

  5. C5

    Xwísten Community Profile

    Xwísten, Bridge River Indian Band · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2014 web edition

  6. C6

    Introduction Lesson: Syilx History

    Okanagan Nation Alliance, Syilx 101 · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  7. C7

    History and Archaeology

    Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · Undated institutional record; consulted 2026-10-20

  8. C8

    Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Typology and Chronology Across the Great Basin

    Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resource Series; Bryan Hockett and collaborators · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2022-12-21 institutional record

  9. S1

    The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume I: Taphonomy

    Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2000; digital edition 2017

  10. S2

    The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume II: Socioeconomy

    Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2000; digital edition 2017

  11. S3

    The Ancient Past of Keatley Creek, Volume III: Excavations and Artifacts

    Brian Hayden and contributors; Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press · Institutional research, heritage interpretation or community account; brief attributed paraphrase · 2004; digital edition 2017

Les sources et les noms restent la propriété de leurs éditeurs et communautés respectifs. Ils sont mentionnés à des fins de citation et d'éducation ; leur présence n'implique aucune recommandation de DNAGENICS par ces derniers. Les résumés sont des paraphrases éditoriales originales et doivent être comparés à la source liée pour tout usage important.

Revisión editorial: 20 octobre 2026