Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13763
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Tanzania in the Africa East Pastoralist Iron Age era

I13763
175 BCE - 215 BCE
Female
Prehistoric and Iron Age in Tanzania
Tanzania
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13763

Date Range

175 BCE - 215 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Cultural Period

Prehistoric and Iron Age in Tanzania

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Tanzania
Locality Karatu District. Northeastern shore of Lake Eyasi. Gishimangeda
Coordinates -3.4760, 35.3480
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13763 175 BCE - 215 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The prehistoric period and Iron Age in Tanzania, particularly in the context of the Bantu migrations, is a fascinating era marked by significant cultural and technological transitions. This period, which spans from prehistoric times through the development of iron technology, is crucial for understanding the foundations of various Bantu cultures that progressively shaped the cultural landscape of Tanzania.

Prehistoric Period in Tanzania

Early Human Occupation

Tanzania is home to some of the earliest known hominid fossils, thanks to its rich archaeological sites like Olduvai Gorge and Laetoli. Olduvai Gorge, situated in the Great Rift Valley, has been instrumental in providing insight into early human evolution. Discoveries such as those of Homo habilis and Homo erectus highlight the presence of proto-human species approximately 2 million years ago.

Stone Age Cultures

The Stone Age in Tanzania is characterized by the use of stone tools and is divided into different phases: the Early, Middle, and Late Stone Ages. During the Early Stone Age, large hand axes and cleavers made by hominins like Homo habilis dominated the toolkits. The Middle Stone Age introduced more refined tools, often associated with Homo sapiens, showing advances in technology and adaptation strategies.

The Late Stone Age saw the development of micro-lithic tool cultures, which were efficient and more suited to varied environmental conditions. This period also marked significant advancements in social organization and artistic expression, as illustrated by rock art found throughout Tanzania.

Iron Age in Tanzania

Bantu Migrations

The Bantu migrations, which began around 1000 BC, significantly influenced Tanzania's history. The Bantu-speaking peoples migrated from their Central African homeland, bringing with them new technologies, crops, and cultural practices. This dispersal led to the development of new societies in East Africa, including Tanzania.

Introduction of Ironworking

Around the first millennium AD, the advent of iron technology transformed societies in Tanzania. The ability to smelt and forge iron tools and weapons provided significant advantages over communities that relied on stone or bone. Iron tools enabled more efficient agriculture, hunting, and warfare, facilitating population growth and the expansion of Bantu societies.

Iron smelting sites such as those at Engaruka and Ugweno illustrate the spread and development of iron technology. These sites reveal a sophisticated understanding of metallurgy, kiln construction, and resource management, which were essential for village and community life.

Socio-economic and Cultural Developments

The Iron Age in Tanzania saw the rise of complex societies with hierarchical structures. Settlements became more permanent and socially stratified, with agriculture serving as the economic base. Key crops introduced by the Bantu included millet, sorghum, and eventually bananas, shaping subsistence patterns.

Socially, this era witnessed the development of pottery styles, which reflected cultural exchanges and local innovations. Various Bantu groups, such as the Zanaki, Sukuma, Haya, and many others, cultivated distinct languages, traditions, and governance structures, which laid the foundation for modern ethnic identities in Tanzania.

Trade and Interactions

During the Iron Age, Tanzanian communities engaged in extensive trade networks stretching across the region. This trade involved ivory, salt, and later on, gold, linking the interior of East Africa with coastal communities and beyond to the Indian Ocean trade networks. The exchange of goods, ideas, and technologies with Arab, Persian, and Indian traders later during and beyond the Iron Age had lasting impacts on the cultural and technological landscape of the region.

Conclusion

The Prehistoric and Iron Age periods in Tanzania were times of profound transformation. These eras encapsulate the journey of human evolution, the advent and impact of iron technology, and the rise of Bantu cultures that collectively laid the groundwork for Tanzania's current cultural diversity. Understanding these periods sheds light on the dynamic interactions between humans and their environment, the interplay of technology and society, and the ongoing legacy of cultural adaptation and resilience.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Ancient DNA reveals a multistep spread of the first herders into sub-Saharan Africa

Authors Prendergast ME, Lipson M, Sawchuk EA
Abstract

How food production first entered eastern Africa ~5000 years ago and the extent to which people moved with livestock is unclear. We present genome-wide data from 41 individuals associated with Later Stone Age, Pastoral Neolithic (PN), and Iron Age contexts in what are now Kenya and Tanzania to examine the genetic impacts of the spreads of herding and farming. Our results support a multiphase model in which admixture between northeastern African-related peoples and eastern African foragers formed multiple pastoralist groups, including a genetically homogeneous PN cluster. Additional admixture with northeastern and western African-related groups occurred by the Iron Age. These findings support several movements of food producers while rejecting models of minimal admixture with foragers and of genetic differentiation between makers of distinct PN artifacts.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27