Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I20750
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Hungary in the Middle Bronze Age era

I20750
2300 BCE - 1600 BCE
Male
Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary
Hungary
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I20750

Date Range

2300 BCE - 1600 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Cultural Period

Middle Bronze Age Füzesabony Culture, Hungary

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Hungary
Locality Polgar Kenderfold
Coordinates 47.8664, 21.1199
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I20750 2300 BCE - 1600 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Füzesabony culture, a significant entity within the Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin, predominantly thrived in what is present-day northeastern Hungary and parts of Slovakia. This culture is estimated to have flourished between 2000 and 1400 BCE, emerging as a distinct cultural manifestation within the complex tapestry of the European Bronze Age.

Geographical and Environmental Context

The Füzesabony culture developed in the northeastern region of the Carpathian Basin, characterized by varied landscapes and rich ecological diversity. This area includes flat plains, rolling hills, and fertile river valleys, elements that would have provided ample resources for agriculture, animal husbandry, and settlement development. The Tisza River and its tributaries played a crucial role in sustaining the communities, offering water resources, fertile lands, and facilitating trade and communication.

Settlements and Architecture

The settlements of the Füzesabony culture were typically located on elevated terrains or along watercourses to leverage natural defenses and access to water. Archaeological evidence suggests the existence of both open settlements and more fortified sites, likely used in times of conflict or as communal centers.

Houses were generally constructed using wooden frameworks, wattle and daub walls, and thatched roofs. The circular or oval forms of these structures, sometimes with sunken floors, suggest they were built to optimize space and thermal efficiency. Settlements often included granaries and storage pits, revealing a society capable of producing and storing surplus food.

Economy and Subsistence

The Füzesabony culture exhibited a mixed agro-pastoral economy. Archaeobotanical studies highlight the cultivation of cereals such as barley, wheat, and millet, alongside legumes. The presence of grinding stones indicates the processing of grains, suggesting a diet rich in bread and porridges.

Animal husbandry was also a cornerstone of their economy, with cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs being the primary domesticated species. Remnants of horse bones suggest the use of horses, possibly for transport or as pack animals, indicating the culture's engagement in trade and movement.

Material Culture

Artifacts from the Füzesabony culture indicate advanced craftsmanship in pottery, metallurgy, and textiles. Pottery, often undecorated or adorned with simple geometric motifs, was functional and varied in form, including bowls, jugs, and storage vessels.

Bronze metallurgy was a defining feature of the culture, with the production of tools, weapons, and jewelry. Items like sickles, axes, daggers, and pins reveal both utilitarian and ceremonial uses. The ability to create alloy compositions and molds indicates a sophisticated understanding of metallurgical techniques.

Trade and Interaction

The Füzesabony culture was part of a wider Bronze Age network that facilitated the exchange of goods, technologies, and ideas across Europe. The movement of raw materials, such as copper and tin, essential for bronze production, highlights their integration into long-distance trade networks. Artifacts found in burial sites suggest links with neighboring cultures, such as the Otomani-Füzesabony group, indicating cultural exchange and possibly intermarriage.

Social Structure and Religion

While direct evidence is limited, the social structure of the Füzesabony culture can be inferred from burial practices and settlement patterns. The differentiation in grave goods suggests a stratified society with a hierarchy influenced by access to resources and possibly skilled craftsmanship. Burials often contained personal items, weapons, and ornaments, possibly signifying the deceased's status or role in society.

Religious and spiritual beliefs are primarily interpreted through burial customs and ritual deposits. The alignment and positioning of graves, along with the inclusion of offerings, hint at beliefs in an afterlife and ancestor veneration. The presence of special ceremonial objects, such as miniature representations of tools or weapons, could have played roles in both religious and social rituals.

Legacy and Influence

The Füzesabony culture represents a crucial phase in the European Bronze Age, embodying the transition from early to mature Bronze Age societies. Its developments in metallurgy, agriculture, and social organization laid the groundwork for subsequent regional cultures. The Füzesabony culture thus helped shape the trajectory of the later prehistoric societies in the Carpathian Basin and beyond, with its influences potentially seen in succeeding cultural groups during the Late Bronze Age.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I20750 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Western Steppe Pastoralists 41.2%
European Hunter-Gatherers 33.5%
Neolithic Farmers 20.9%
Ancient Asians 4.4%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Europe 98.6%
Northwestern European 62.3%
Scandinavian 26.3%
English 21.3%
Northwestern European 14.7%
Eastern European 23.6%
Eastern European 23.6%
Southern European 12.7%
Balkan 10.7%
Iberian 2.0%
Africa 1.4%
African Hunter-Gatherer 1.4%
African Hunter-Gatherer 1.4%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A man buried in Hungary in the Middle Bronze Age era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Swedish
2.4433
2
Czech
2.4943
3
Polish
2.5644
4
Polish Kashubian
2.5797
5
German Hamburg
2.7312
6
Polish Silesian
2.8757
7
German East
2.9384
8
Slovakian
2.9871
9
Ukrainian Dnipro
3.2374
10
Ukrainian Rivne
3.2678
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

A minimally destructive protocol for DNA extraction from ancient teeth

Authors Harney É, Cheronet O, Fernandes DM
Abstract

Ancient DNA sampling methods-although optimized for efficient DNA extraction-are destructive, relying on drilling or cutting and powdering (parts of) bones and teeth. As the field of ancient DNA has grown, so have concerns about the impact of destructive sampling of the skeletal remains from which ancient DNA is obtained. Due to a particularly high concentration of endogenous DNA, the cementum of tooth roots is often targeted for ancient DNA sampling, but destructive sampling methods of the cementum often result in the loss of at least one entire root. Here, we present a minimally destructive method for extracting ancient DNA from dental cementum present on the surface of tooth roots. This method does not require destructive drilling or grinding, and, following extraction, the tooth remains safe to handle and suitable for most morphological studies, as well as other biochemical studies, such as radiocarbon dating. We extracted and sequenced ancient DNA from 30 teeth (and nine corresponding petrous bones) using this minimally destructive extraction method in addition to a typical tooth sampling method. We find that the minimally destructive method can provide ancient DNA that is of comparable quality to extracts produced from teeth that have undergone destructive sampling processes. Further, we find that a rigorous cleaning of the tooth surface combining diluted bleach and UV light irradiation seems sufficient to minimize external contaminants usually removed through the physical removal of a superficial layer when sampling through regular powdering methods.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I20750 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I20750,0.13282292,0.12380882,0.0667695,0.06245988,0.03670158,0.02512698,0.00688634,0.01210298,0.00123018,-0.01673846,-0.00794206,-0.00142258,0.00774156,0.00649104,0.0045297,0.0039756,-0.00332274,0.00051984,0.00230576,0.00250006,0.00230288,0.00024126,0.00182584,0.00684814,-0.00165339
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27