Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of N2a
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Russia in the Neolithic era

N2a
4903 BCE - 4721 BCE
Female
Early Neolithic Lena River, Russia
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

N2a

Date Range

4903 BCE - 4721 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Cultural Period

Early Neolithic Lena River, Russia

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Far Eastern Federal District. Yakutia. Lena River. Matta lake burial
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

N2a 4903 BCE - 4721 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Early Neolithic period along the Lena River in Siberia represents a fascinating era of cultural evolution among hunter-gatherer societies. This era, roughly dated between 8000 and 5000 BCE, showcases significant advancements in technology, social organization, and adaptation strategies to the challenging environments of Siberia.

Geography and Environment

The Lena River, one of the longest rivers in the world, flows through the vast Siberian landscape. It serves as a crucial lifeline in a region characterized by harsh climates and diverse ecosystems. The river runs through taiga forests and tundra, providing a rich variety of resources despite the extreme cold and long winters typical of Siberia. The region's climate during the Early Neolithic was slightly milder than today, experiencing gradual changes leading to modern climatic conditions.

Society and Culture

Subsistence and Economy

The Early Neolithic populations along the Lena River were primarily hunter-gatherers, relying on hunting, fishing, and gathering to sustain themselves. The diverse fauna, including reindeer, elk, and fish, provided protein sources, while plant gathering supplemented their diet. Evidence of fish traps and other fishing implements indicates that fishing was particularly significant to these communities.

Technological advancements during this period are marked by the development of more sophisticated tools. The invention and refinement of microlithic toolkits, including blades and scrapers, suggest a deep understanding of the available resources and the need for efficient hunting and processing techniques. The use of bone and antler tools also highlights adaptation strategies to the local environment.

Settlement Patterns

Archaeological findings suggest that these hunter-gatherers were semi-nomadic, with settlements often located near water sources and in areas rich in game and plant life. These settlements were likely seasonal, with groups moving according to the availability of resources. Sites along the Lena River show evidence of dwellings that suggest a degree of permanence, possibly due to the abundant resources provided by the river.

Social Structure

The social organization of the Early Neolithic people of the Lena River is not well-documented, but it is likely that their society was organized in small, kin-based groups. These groups were potentially egalitarian, with a social structure that depended heavily on cooperation for subsistence activities. The communal nature of large hunting and fishing expeditions implies some level of social coordination and shared responsibility.

Spiritual and Artistic Practices

The cultural expressions found in this region provide insight into the spiritual and artistic lives of these early Siberians. Rock art, petroglyphs, and portable art objects provide glimpses into their symbolic and ritualistic worldviews. Depictions of animals, hunting scenes, and possibly shamanistic figures suggest a belief system deeply intertwined with nature and the animals upon which they depended.

Burial practices, while not extensively documented, indicate some form of ritualized behavior associated with death. Gravesites occasionally contain grave goods, reflecting a belief in an afterlife or the importance of certain objects in social or spiritual life.

Interaction and Exchange

Although isolated due to geographical barriers, the Siberian hunter-gatherers were not entirely cut off from other contemporary cultures. There is evidence of some form of interaction or exchange, possibly through trade networks that extended across the vast expanses of Siberia. This interaction would have facilitated the exchange of ideas, technologies, and materials, further enriching these communities.

Conclusion

The Early Neolithic era along the Lena River in Siberia paints a picture of a resilient and adaptive people, capable of thriving in one of the world's most challenging environments. Through their technological innovations, social structures, and rich cultural life, these hunter-gatherers laid the foundations for subsequent cultural developments in Siberia. Their legacy is a testament to the enduring human spirit and its capacity to adapt and evolve in harmony with the natural world.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of N2a with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Asians 91.1%
Neolithic Farmers 6.9%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 2.0%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Asia 79.5%
Northern Asian 48.9%
Siberian 36.5%
Mongolian 12.4%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 17.5%
Chinese 9.8%
Vietnamese 7.7%
Japanese & Korean 13.2%
Japanese 13.2%
America 13.9%
America 13.9%
Native American 13.9%
Europe 5.8%
Northwestern European 3.0%
Northwestern European 3.0%
Eastern European 2.8%
Eastern European 2.8%
Africa 0.8%
Northern East African 0.8%
Ethiopian 0.8%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Russia in the Neolithic era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Khakass
7.8734
2
Khakass Kachins
8.2451
3
Teleut
8.3733
4
Teleut O
8.9539
5
Altaian
9.1247
6
Shor Khakassia
9.3583
7
Altaian Kizhi
9.3833
8
Shor
9.5421
9
Shor Mountain
9.7827
10
Kirghiz
10.1350
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Human population dynamics and Yersinia pestis in ancient northeast Asia

Authors Kılınç GM, Kashuba N, Koptekin D
Abstract

We present genome-wide data from 40 individuals dating to c.16,900 to 550 years ago in northeast Asia. We describe hitherto unknown gene flow and admixture events in the region, revealing a complex population history. While populations east of Lake Baikal remained relatively stable from the Mesolithic to the Bronze Age, those from Yakutia and west of Lake Baikal witnessed major population transformations, from the Late Upper Paleolithic to the Neolithic, and during the Bronze Age, respectively. We further locate the Asian ancestors of Paleo-Inuits, using direct genetic evidence. Last, we report the most northeastern ancient occurrence of the plague-related bacterium, Yersinia pestis Our findings indicate the highly connected and dynamic nature of northeast Asia populations throughout the Holocene.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample N2a can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

N2a,0.05763186,-0.27017728,0.08908028,0.0220723,-0.05566526,-0.02444966,-0.01597276,-0.01496434,0.00410608,-0.008345,0.02193702,-0.00553302,0.00912622,-0.02852452,-0.01814682,-0.01103458,-0.00441756,0.00701434,0.0164974,0.00537192,0.00900082,-0.00854964,0.01783014,0.00497654,0.00846289
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27