Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO209
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Russia in the Neolithic era

NEO209
5621 BCE - 5482 BCE
Male
Don Culture of Northern Mariupol
Russia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO209

Date Range

5621 BCE - 5482 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U5b2

Y-DNA Haplogroup

R-M459

Cultural Period

Don Culture of Northern Mariupol

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Russia
Locality Golubaya-Krinitsa (Voronezh Oblast, Rossoshansky District, Golubaya Krinitsa Village)
Coordinates 50.0914, 39.8945
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO209 5621 BCE - 5482 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Don Culture of Northern Mariupol is a significant archaeological and cultural entity from the early European epoch, approximately situated during the Copper Age or Eneolithic period, around 4500 to 3500 BCE. This culture is closely associated with the expansive steppe regions of Eastern Europe, particularly near the Sea of Azov, which is in present-day southeastern Ukraine and southwestern Russia. The culture reflects a complex interplay of indigenous developments and external influences due to its strategic positioning along the trade routes between the East and West.

Geography and Environment

The Northern Mariupol region, characterized by its rolling steppes, rich black soil, and proximity to the Sea of Azov, provided a fertile backdrop for the development of the Don Culture. The area’s rivers, such as the Donets, supported the settlement and agriculture, while the steppe allowed for expansive pastoralism.

Economy and Subsistence

The Don Culture's economy was based on a mixed subsistence strategy that included agriculture, pastoralism, fishing, and hunting. They cultivated cereal crops like wheat and barley and domesticated animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats. The exploitation of river and sea resources indicates the use of fishing techniques and possibly early trade or exchange networks involving marine products.

Settlements and Architecture

Archaeological findings suggest semi-permanent settlements with circular or oval pit-houses partially dug into the ground, providing insulation against the region’s climatic extremes. These dwellings were typically constructed using timber frames with wattle and daub walls, topped with thatched roofs, showcasing an understanding of local resources and environmental adaptation.

Social Structure and Organization

The social structure of the Don Culture was likely organized around extended family units or clans. Evidence from burial sites, such as the Sokolaki and Dereivka sites, provides insights into social differentiation, possibly hinting at emerging social hierarchies. Burials often included grave goods, which could indicate the status or profession of the individuals.

Material Culture and Artifacts

The material culture of the Don Culture is distinguished by its pottery, characterized by simple shapes and decorative motifs including incised and impressed geometric patterns. Stone tools, particularly large bifacially worked projectile points, knives, and scrapers, were prevalent.

Unique to the region were their metal artifacts; the Don Culture were among the first to develop and use copper tools and ornaments, marking a significant technological advance over their Neolithic predecessors.

Religion and Spirituality

The spiritual life of the Don Culture is inferred from burial practices and grave goods. Burials were accompanied by offerings of pottery, tools, and ornaments, suggesting a belief in an afterlife. The presence of animal remains in graves may indicate ritualistic feasting or totemic beliefs associating certain animals with spiritual meanings.

Interaction and Influence

The Don Culture was not insular; it exhibited connections with neighboring cultures through trade networks that spread ideas and goods, such as copper metallurgy, far beyond their homelands. Influences from or exchanges with cultures like the Cucuteni-Trypillian to the west or Khvalynsk and Samara to the east may have provided technological, cultural, and artistic stimuli, contributing to the complexity of their society.

Legacy and Impact

The Don Culture’s development of early metallurgy set the foundation for future advances in the Bronze Age. Their innovations in settlement patterns, economy, and social organization influenced subsequent cultures in the region, contributing to the cultural mosaic of prehistoric Europe.

Overall, the Don Culture of Northern Mariupol exemplifies the dynamic interplay of adaptation, innovation, and interaction that characterized early European societies and underscores the importance of the steppe regions in the broader prehistoric narrative.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26