Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

M4’

mtDNA Haplogroup M4’

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig M4’

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup M4' sits within macro-haplogroup M and represents an intermediate branching node that links the M4 lineage(s) with closely related downstream subclades. Based on phylogenetic position and coalescence estimates for related M clades, M4' likely formed in South Asia during the Upper Paleolithic (~25 kya). Its origin corresponds with the long-term presence and diversification of macro-haplogroup M on the subcontinent following the initial Late Pleistocene settlement of South Asia by modern humans.

M4' is best understood as part of a regional radiation of M-derived lineages that diversified in situ. The present-day distribution reflects both deep continuity among indigenous maternal lineages and later population movements that spread select M4-derived branches into neighbouring Himalayan, Central and Southeast Asian groups.

Subclades (if applicable)

The M4' node gives rise to the named M4 clade and, depending on how the tree is resolved, to immediate downstream sublineages often reported as M4a, M4b (and further subdivisions of those). These subclades show differing geographic and demographic patterns: some are relatively localized and found at higher frequency in tribal and indigenous groups of India, while others are wider in distribution but generally at lower frequency. Ancient DNA and dense mitogenome sequencing continue to refine the internal structure of M4' and its descendant branches.

Geographical Distribution

M4' and its descendant lineages are principally South Asian in distribution, with the strongest representation among tribal and indigenous populations across India and detectable presence in broader caste and general-population samples. Secondary low-to-moderate frequencies occur in adjacent regions including Nepal and Himalayan edge populations, Pakistan (at low–moderate frequency in some groups), Sri Lanka, eastern South Asia (Bengal region), and sporadically in Myanmar, Southeast Asia and parts of Central Asia. The pattern is consistent with an ancient South Asian origin followed by localized persistence and limited overland dispersals into bordering regions.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because of its estimated Upper Paleolithic origin and its concentration in indigenous South Asian groups, M4' is informative for studies of deep maternal ancestry, local continuity, and population structure within South Asia. It is frequently observed in genetic surveys of tribal and rural communities, and appears in some Holocene and archaeological samples from the subcontinent, indicating continuity of maternal lineages through the Late Pleistocene and Holocene. While M4' predates Neolithic and Bronze Age cultural complexes, its descendants may have been assimilated into later cultural horizons such as Neolithic farming communities and, at lower frequency, into Bronze Age populations (including Indus-associated groups) through processes of demographic interaction and admixture.

Conclusion

M4' is a regionally important mtDNA node that captures part of the deep maternal genetic heritage of South Asia. It exemplifies how macro-haplogroup M diversified on the subcontinent and how those lineages persisted and spread into neighbouring mountain and adjacent regions at generally low to moderate frequencies. Continued mitogenome sequencing and ancient DNA sampling from South Asia and adjacent regions will refine the branching order and demographic history of M4' and its subclades.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis M4’. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 M4’ Aktuell ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 M4 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 4 25 1
3 M4"67A - - - 2 43 0
4 M4"67 - - - 8 156 0
5 M ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 42 2,671 41
6 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
7 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
8 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
9 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
10 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
11 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
12 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (3)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

South Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup M4' is found include:

  1. Tribal and indigenous groups across India (e.g., Dravidian-speaking tribal populations)
  2. Caste and general-population samples from North and South India
  3. Nepali and Himalayan groups (including Tibetan-adjacent populations)
  4. Pakistani populations (Sindhi, Punjabi and other groups at low–moderate frequency)
  5. Sri Lankan populations (both Tamil and Sinhalese groups)
  6. Bengali and eastern South Asian populations (Bangladesh and eastern India)
  7. Myanmar and adjacent Southeast Asian populations (low frequency)
  8. Select Central Asian samples (sporadic, low frequency)
  9. Some Himalayan highland populations and Tibetan plateau edge groups
  10. A small number of archaeological/ancient South Asian samples (Holocene contexts)
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~25k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe M4’

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig M4’

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu M4’. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Andamanese British Neolithic Goyet Cave Gravettian Loebanr Culture Medieval Italian Ostuni Culture Roopkund Culture Spanish Gravettian
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.