Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of NEO694
Ancient Individual

A man buried in Spain in the Mesolithic era

NEO694
7648 BCE - 7496 BCE
Male
Iberian Mesolithic Culture
Spain
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NEO694

Date Range

7648 BCE - 7496 BCE

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

U2'3'4'7'8'9

Y-DNA Haplogroup

I-S21825

Cultural Period

Iberian Mesolithic Culture

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Spain
Locality Santa Maira (Comunitat Valenciana, Alicante, Cocentaina)
Coordinates 38.7300, -0.4630
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NEO694 7648 BCE - 7496 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Iberian Mesolithic Culture represents a fascinating period in prehistoric Europe, marking the transition between the Paleolithic hunter-gatherer societies and the advent of the Neolithic, which introduced agriculture and permanent settlements. This era, roughly dating from about 10,000 to 6,000 BCE, is characterized by significant ecological, technological, and social change and is particularly significant for understanding human adaptation to post-glacial environments.

Geographical Context: The Iberian Peninsula, now modern-day Spain and Portugal, is situated at the southwestern edge of Europe. During the Mesolithic period, the landscape was dramatically shaped by the retreat of the Ice Age’s glaciers, leading to the development of diverse biomes such as coastal plains, river valleys, mountainous areas, and dense woodlands. This environmental richness provided a myriad of resources that influenced the subsistence strategies of Mesolithic communities.

Subsistence and Economy: The Iberian Mesolithic peoples were chiefly hunter-gatherers. They exploited the abundant resources available in their varied landscapes. Near coastal areas, marine resources such as shellfish, fish, and sea mammals played a significant role in their diet, as evidenced by shell middens found in several archaeological sites. Inland, communities relied on hunting terrestrial animals like deer and wild boar. They also gathered wild plants, fruits, nuts, and seeds, showcasing a broad-spectrum economy that highlighted adaptability and opportunism in resource exploitation.

Technological and Material Culture: The Iberian Mesolithic is distinguished by microlithic technology. Small, often geometrically shaped stone tools such as trapezoids, triangles, and lunates were common. These microliths were used as tips and barbs in composite tools such as arrows and spears. Bone, antler, and shell were also used to make tools and ornaments, reflecting both functional and symbolic dimensions of material culture.

The presence of art, albeit sparse compared to previous periods, suggests an ongoing expression of symbolic thought. Rock art sites in eastern Iberia, notably in the Levantine route, depict stylized human and animal figures, often interpreted as ritualistic or totemic symbols.

Social Organization: While detailed social structures of Mesolithic societies remain enigmatic due to the paucity of direct evidence, it is likely that these were small, mobile bands organized around kinship ties. Their mobility would have been dictated by seasonal resource availability, leading to semi-nomadic lifestyles with temporary camp sites.

Evidence from burial sites indicates some degree of social differentiation, possibly based on age, sex, or skill. Grave goods, although not as elaborate as in later periods, provide clues about the status and roles of individuals within groups.

Cultural and Environmental Interactions: The Iberian Mesolithic culture did not exist in isolation. There were interactions between different groups, as shown by similarities in tool technologies and exchange networks. These networks facilitated the movement of raw materials like flint, and later obsidian, across considerable distances.

The transition from Mesolithic to Neolithic is marked in some areas by the adoption of agriculture and sedentism, as interactions with incoming Neolithic farmers from the east introduced new techniques and material culture. However, the degree and nature of this transition varied, with some groups adopting new ways of life rapidly while others maintained traditional practices for longer periods.

Legacy and Importance: Understanding the Iberian Mesolithic era offers critical insights into how prehistoric communities adapted to changing environments, navigated social complexities, and laid the groundwork for subsequent cultural developments. This period illustrates a dynamic interplay between humans and their environment, highlighting adaptability and resilience in human history. This era set the stage for the dramatic transformations of the Neolithic revolution, which reshaped human societies fundamentally.

Chapter V

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia

Authors Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A
Abstract

Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene1-5. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes-mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods-from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a 'great divide' genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a 'Neolithic steppe' cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 26