Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A man buried in China in the Late Paleolithic era
Ancient Individual

A man buried in China in the Late Paleolithic era

A man buried in China during the Late Paleolithic China

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

NE5
12371 BCE - 12101 BCE
Male
China
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

NE5

Date Range

12371 BCE - 12101 BCE

Cultural Period

Late Paleolithic China

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

Not available

Y-DNA Haplogroup

C

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country China
Locality Amur River Basin
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

NE5 12371 BCE - 12101 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Late Paleolithic period in China, particularly near the Amur River, is a fascinating era that marks the later stages of the Paleolithic period, often characterized by the development and maturation of human cultural traits and technological innovations.

Ecological and Geographical Setting

The Amur River, forming part of the border between northeastern China and southeastern Russia, is a major waterway that has historically supported human settlement due to its rich ecological resources. The region's climate during the Late Paleolithic (approximately 40,000 to 10,000 years ago) was influenced by the Pleistocene Ice Age, with environmental conditions ranging from glacial to temperate phases. This led to diverse ecosystems that offered abundant resources for human populations.

Archaeological Sites and Discoveries

Several significant archaeological sites in and around the Amur River have provided evidence of Late Paleolithic human activity. These sites exhibit a range of stone tools, including sophisticated blades, microliths, and composite tools, reflecting advanced technological skills. Moreover, evidence of habitation structures, hearths, and food remains like animal bones and plant residues have been discovered, offering insights into the daily lives and subsistence strategies of these communities.

Technological and Cultural Developments

The Late Paleolithic in this region is notable for the innovation and diversification of lithic industries. Stone tool technology transitioned from simple core and flake tools to more refined blade and microblade techniques. These advances facilitated a broader range of activities, including hunting, processing plant materials, and other domestic tasks.

Culturally, this era saw the development of symbolic behavior, as evidenced by personal ornaments, artifacts with potential artistic value, and the use of pigments. This indicates the emergence of complex cognitive abilities and social structures.

Subsistence and Economy

The inhabitants of the Amur River region during the Late Paleolithic were primarily hunter-gatherers. The ecological diversity allowed them to exploit a wide range of food sources. Large game such as deer and smaller mammals were hunted, complemented by fishing and gathering of plant resources. This diverse diet was supported by the development of tools optimized for specific tasks, indicating a sophisticated understanding of their environment.

Social Organization and Structure

While direct evidence of social organization is limited, the complexity of the tools and artifacts implies a degree of social structure. Bands of hunter-gatherers likely lived in small to medium-sized groups, with social roles possibly influenced by age, gender, and skills. The presence of non-utilitarian objects and ceremonial artifacts suggests the existence of spiritual beliefs and practices.

Conclusion

The Late Paleolithic period along the Amur River in China represents a crucial phase in the development of human societies. The technological advancements, coupled with evidence of symbolic thought and complex social behavior, highlight the region's role in the broader narrative of human prehistory. Continued research and archaeological exploration in this area are vital to further our understanding of these early communities and their contributions to human civilization.

Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
NE57 Mesolithic China 9243 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE30 Early Neolithic China 8175 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE35 Early Neolithic China 7172 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE58 Neolithic China 5471 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE61 Bronze Age China 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE45 Early Neolithic China 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE44 Early Neolithic China 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE56 Late Paleolithic China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE34 Late Paleolithic China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE5 Late Paleolithic China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE1 Late Paleolithic China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE3 Mesolithic China 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE4 Mesolithic China 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE8 Mesolithic China 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE36 Mesolithic China 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE9 Neolithic China 4448 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE29 Neolithic China 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE19 Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE39 Neolithic China 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE2 Neolithic China 4445 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE16 Neolithic China 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE49 Neolithic China 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE22 Neolithic China 4990 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE18 Neolithic China 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE20 Paleolithic China 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE20 32159 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE56 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE34 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE5 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE1 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE8 9442 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE36 8810 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE3 8782 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE4 8740 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE45 7458 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE44 7456 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE16 6690 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE49 6465 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE39 6375 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE18 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE19 5210 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE29 4999 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE22 4990 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE9 4448 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE2 4445 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE61 1510 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
NE56 Late Paleolithic China 17605 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE34 Late Paleolithic China 12896 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE5 Late Paleolithic China 12371 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
NE1 Late Paleolithic China 10774 BCE Amur River Basin, China View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

The deep population history of northern East Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene

Authors Mao X, Zhang H, Qiao S, Liu Y, Chang F et al.
Abstract

Northern East Asia was inhabited by modern humans as early as 40 thousand years ago (ka), as demonstrated by the Tianyuan individual. Using genome-wide data obtained from 25 individuals dated to 33.6-3.4 ka from the Amur region, we show that Tianyuan-related ancestry was widespread in northern East Asia before the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). At the close of the LGM stadial, the earliest northern East Asian appeared in the Amur region, and this population is basal to ancient northern East Asians. Human populations in the Amur region have maintained genetic continuity from 14 ka, and these early inhabitants represent the closest East Asian source known for Ancient Paleo-Siberians. We also observed that EDAR V370A was likely to have been elevated to high frequency after the LGM, suggesting the possible timing for its selection. This study provides a deep look into the population dynamics of northern East Asia.

Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 13