Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

A5C

mtDNA Haplogroup A5C

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig A5C

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup A5C is a downstream branch of haplogroup A5, itself an East Asian offshoot of macro-haplogroup A. Based on the parent clade's late Pleistocene/early Holocene chronology (A5 ca. ~15 kya) and the internal diversity observed in A5 subclades, A5C most plausibly coalesced in the Early Holocene (roughly ~9 kya) in northeastern East Asia. Its formation fits a pattern of postglacial diversification and local differentiation as populations that persisted through the Last Glacial Maximum expanded and reoccupied northern East Asian environments.

Population-genetic signals for A5 and related A subclades indicate long-term presence in the region with pockets of continuity (especially in northern Japan and adjacent coastal/continental areas). Where sample coverage permits, A5C shows limited internal diversity consistent with a regional lineage that expanded at modest levels rather than a continent-wide radiation.

Subclades (if applicable)

At present, A5C is treated as a named subclade within A5. Published and unpublished phylogenies report a small number of derived lineages branching from A5C in modern and ancient samples; however, its substructure is shallower compared with deeper A5 branches. Continued mitogenome sequencing in Northeast Asia and Japan may reveal additional internal subclades (e.g., regional A5C1/A5C2-style splits) that could clarify local demographic events.

Geographical Distribution

A5C is principally a Northeast/East Asian maternal lineage. It is most frequently observed in northern parts of the Japanese archipelago (including among populations with Jomon ancestry such as some Ainu and Ryukyuan individuals) and is also present in the Korean Peninsula, northeastern China (northern Han and other Tungusic-adjacent groups), Mongolia, and parts of Siberia. Low-frequency occurrences have been reported in some Central Asian and Turkic groups, likely reflecting long-distance gene flow or historical contacts across the steppe.

Ancient DNA evidence includes a small number of archaeological samples (noted here as three database hits) that place A5C or closely related A5 lineages in Holocene contexts, supporting continuity between prehistoric foragers and some modern northeastern Asian maternal pools.

Historical and Cultural Significance

A5C's distribution and age make it informative for studies of postglacial recolonization, coastal and inland hunter-gatherer persistence, and regional continuity in northeast Asia. In Japan, the presence of A5C among populations with Jomon ancestry supports interpretations of maternal continuity from the Jomon period into historic populations, even after admixture events (for example, with Yayoi-associated migrants). Across the broader region, A5C is one of several maternal lineages (alongside haplogroups D4, G, N9a, M7, etc.) that together document the complex demographic history of northern East Asia, including local survival during the Last Glacial Maximum and Holocene expansions.

A5C is therefore useful in archaeological genetics for distinguishing local continuity versus incoming farmer or pastoralist signals, and for tracking maritime or coastal connections among prehistoric East Asian groups.

Conclusion

mtDNA A5C represents a regional maternal lineage of northeast Asia with an early Holocene origin and a distribution concentrated in northern Japan, the Korean Peninsula, northeast China, Mongolia and parts of Siberia, with sporadic presence further west. Although currently represented by modest diversity and relatively few ancient occurrences, A5C contributes to the broader picture of maternal continuity and postglacial demographic processes in northeast Asia and will likely yield additional insights as more complete mitogenomes and ancient samples are characterized.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis A5C. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 A5C Aktuell ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 0 3 0
2 A5 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 3 16 0
3 A ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 4 997 192
4 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
5 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
6 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
7 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
8 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
9 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
10 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
11 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (2)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Northeast/East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup A5C is found include:

  1. Indigenous and modern populations of the Japanese archipelago (including Ainu and some Ryukyuan groups)
  2. Korean populations
  3. Northern Han Chinese and other northeast Chinese groups
  4. Mongolian populations and adjacent steppe groups (low–moderate frequency)
  5. Indigenous Siberian groups (e.g., Evenks, Yakuts) at moderate frequency
  6. Selected Central Asian and Turkic groups at low frequency
  7. Ancient Holocene forager samples (3 ancient samples identified in the database)
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~9k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe A5C

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig A5C

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu A5C. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Angara River Culture Kitoi Kuenga Culture Lokomotiv Culture Ob River Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_Eneolithic Russia_Irkutsk_Eneolithic_BA Ulgii Culture Ust-Ida Culture Wuzhuangguoliang Culture Yenisei Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.