Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

C1B2A

Y-DNA Haplogroup C1B2A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig C1B2A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup C1B2A is a subclade of C1B2, a deep paternal lineage that diversified in the islands of Wallacea and adjacent regions during the Late Pleistocene. As a descendant of C1b-derived lineages, C1B2A most likely originated among coastal and island forager populations that dispersed through island Southeast Asia and into Near Oceania during periods of lowered sea level and active maritime movement. The estimated age for C1B2A (on the order of tens of thousands of years) places its origin after the initial split of C1B2 but well before the major Holocene-scale expansions associated with Austronesian-speaking peoples.

Subclades

C1B2A includes downstream branches that are currently recognized primarily through targeted Y-SNP testing in Wallacean and Near Oceanian samples. Sublineages show geographically structured variation consistent with long-term local differentiation across islands (e.g., Sulawesi, the Moluccas, Timor region) and the Papuan fringe. Because sampling is still incomplete in many island groups, the internal topology and number of named subclades remain an active area of research; additional diversity is expected to be revealed by broader whole-Y sequencing in understudied island populations.

Geographical Distribution

C1B2A today is concentrated in Wallacea and Near Oceania, with highest frequencies and diversity in eastern Indonesian islands and adjacent Melanesian populations. It is commonly observed among:

  • Wallacean island groups (Sulawesi, Maluku, Nusa Tenggara) and nearby coastal islands
  • Papuan and Near Oceanian groups (coastal and some interior communities of New Guinea, Bismarck Archipelago, Solomon Islands)
  • Melanesian populations at variable frequencies, often coexisting with other Papuan-associated Y-haplogroups
  • Austronesian-speaking coastal communities in eastern Indonesia and parts of eastern Island Southeast Asia (generally at lower to moderate frequency)

Sparse or sporadic occurrences have also been reported in other maritime Southeast Asian and island East Asian samples (e.g., parts of the Philippines, Taiwan, southern Japan) as a result of ancient contacts or later admixture. Overall, the distribution pattern of C1B2A supports a model of early island-coastal settlement followed by localized persistence and limited Holocene gene flow with arriving agriculturalist populations.

Historical and Cultural Significance

While C1B2A predates major Holocene archaeological cultures in the region, it is relevant for understanding the genetic background of the inhabitants encountered by later cultural phenomena. Its persistence through time means C1B2A lineages likely contributed paternally to populations that later participated in the Austronesian expansion and in the formation of the Lapita cultural horizon in Near Oceania, although C1B2A is generally more associated with pre-Lapita Paleolithic coastal forager ancestry than with the incoming Austronesian farmer male lineages. In locales with strong Papuan genetic continuity, C1B2A can serve as a marker of long-term island residence and local demographic history, including founder effects on smaller islands and sex-biased admixture during Holocene interactions.

Conclusion

C1B2A is a geographically focused, deep-rooting paternal lineage that illuminates patterns of human settlement in Wallacea and Near Oceania. Its age and distribution are consistent with an origin among Late Pleistocene island/coastal populations, followed by long-term local differentiation and limited incorporation into later Holocene expansions. Continued sampling and high-resolution Y-chromosome sequencing across Wallacea and Near Oceania will refine the subclade structure, age estimates, and the role of C1B2A in regional demographic events.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis C1B2A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 C1B2A Aktuell ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 1 7 0
2 C1B2 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 Jahre 1 7 0
3 C1B ~35,000 years ago Paleolithic 35,000 Jahre 2 28 0
4 C1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 92 0
5 C ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 3 406 35
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Wallacea (Island Southeast Asia)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup C1B2A is found include:

  1. Wallacean island populations (e.g., Sulawesi, Maluku, Nusa Tenggara)
  2. Near Oceanian groups (Papua New Guinea, Bismarck Archipelago, Solomon Islands)
  3. Melanesian populations at varying frequencies
  4. Austronesian-speaking coastal communities in eastern Indonesia
  5. Selected insular South Asian/Timorese populations at low frequency
  6. Sporadic occurrences in parts of the Philippines, Taiwan, and southern Japan
  7. Diasporic or admixed groups across Southeast Asia and Oceania (trace occurrences)

Regionale Präsenz

Near Oceania / Melanesia High
Australia (Indigenous groups) Moderate
Southeast Asia (eastern islands / Wallacea) Low
Papua New Guinea High
Melanesia Moderate
East Asia (island/coastal) Low
South Asia (insular/coastal) Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  2. ~18k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe C1B2A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig C1B2A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu C1B2A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

1983 Ancient Polynesian Botocudo Historic Polynesian Hoabinhian Late Vanuatu Post-Lapita Vanuatu Saudeleur Culture Vanuatu Historical
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-15
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.