Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1

Y-DNA Haplogroup E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1

Origins and Evolution

E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1A1 sits very deep in the terminal branches of the North African E‑M81 (classically E1b1b1b) radiation. This is an extremely recent, derived SNP-defined subclade that most likely arose as a single-founder mutation in the Maghreb (northwest Africa) within the last few centuries (on the order of decades to a few hundred years). Its very short time depth and narrow distribution are consistent with a classic founder event followed by drift in small, relatively isolated communities.

The phylogenetic position — as a child of E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A — places it inside the well-documented North African E‑M81 family, which itself expanded across the Maghreb over the Holocene and shows strong association with Amazigh (Berber) populations. Because of the recent origin, this subclade often shows extremely low internal diversity and very tight STR/SNP clustering among carriers.

Subclades

At present this lineage is described as a terminal subclade (a deep terminal SNP) with no widely reported downstream branches in published datasets; if further downstream SNPs are found they are expected to be even rarer and geographically localized. Given its recent emergence, much of the present-day diversity will be due to private mutations and micro‑founder events in individual families or villages rather than long-standing sub-structure.

Geographical Distribution

The strongest concentrations are in northwest Africa (the Maghreb), especially within specific Amazigh (Berber) communities in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia where local founder effects amplify a single rare subclade. The haplogroup also appears at elevated frequency on some Atlantic islands with North African links — most notably the Canary Islands, where founder events in prehispanic Guanche populations and later island demography can preserve rare local lineages. Low to moderate presence is reported in southern Iberia (western Andalusia and Portugal) and scattered low-frequency occurrences occur elsewhere in the central/western Mediterranean (parts of Sicily, the Balearic Islands) usually attributable to historic maritime contact and gene flow. Very low-frequency signals may be detected in Sahelian/West African groups and in Afro‑descended populations in the Americas due to recent admixture and diaspora.

Because the clade is so recent and spatially restricted, distribution maps are patchy and sensitive to sampling: small isolated communities with documented founder events will show much higher local frequency than general national samples.

Historical and Cultural Significance

This subclade's significance is primarily demographic and anthropological rather than ancient: it is a marker of very recent local male founder events among Amazigh groups and specific island communities. Its presence in southern Iberia and Mediterranean islands reflects centuries of cross‑Mediterranean contact (trade, migration, conquests and maritime movement) between North Africa and Iberia rather than a major prehistoric migration wave.

The association with Amazigh communities is consistent with the broader E‑M81 complex, which is widely interpreted as a North African paternal lineage with deep roots in the Maghreb. In island settings (e.g., Canary Islands) the haplogroup may be preserved in descendant families from prehispanic settlers (Guanche) or introduced and amplified by later settlement bottlenecks.

Practical notes for researchers and genealogists

  • Because this lineage is so recent, high‑resolution SNP testing (not just STR-based prediction) is essential to confirm membership and to differentiate it from closely related E‑M81 subclades.
  • Very low diversity within the clade makes it useful for recent genealogical inference within affected communities but of limited use for deep-time population inference.
  • Complementary maternal lineages in North Africa (e.g., mtDNA U6, M1 and North African subclades of H) are often found in the same populations and can provide a fuller picture of regional ancestry.

Conclusion

E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1A1 is a textbook example of a very recent, geographically localized paternal founder lineage arising within the North African E‑M81 family. Its distribution and significance are driven by recent demographic processes — founder effects, isolation and localized drift — rather than by ancient continental‑scale migrations. Continued targeted SNP sequencing in Maghrebine and island populations will clarify internal structure and historic transmission routes.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Practical notes for researchers and genealogists
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1 Aktuell ~50 years ago Modern <100 Jahre 1 0 0
2 E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A ~100 years ago Modern 100 Jahre 1 0 0
3 E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1 ~100 years ago Modern 100 Jahre 2 0 0
4 E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A ~200 years ago Modern 200 Jahre 1 0 0
5 E1B1B1B2A1A1A1 ~300 years ago Modern 300 Jahre 1 0 0
6 E1B1B1B2A1A1A ~500 years ago Modern 500 Jahre 1 0 0
7 E1B1B1B2A1A1 ~800 years ago Medieval 800 Jahre 1 0 0
8 E1B1B1B2A1A ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,200 Jahre 4 118 1
9 E1B1B1B2A1 ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 1,800 Jahre 1 134 0
10 E1B1B1B2A ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,200 Jahre 1 143 2
11 E1B1B1B2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 177 0
12 E1B1B1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 405 0
13 E1B1B1 ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 1,055 0
14 E1B1B ~26,000 years ago Paleolithic 26,000 Jahre 1 1,116 2
15 E1B1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 Jahre 2 1,572 0
16 E1B ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 1 1,583 0
17 E1 ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 Jahre 2 1,667 2
18 E ~50,000 years ago Paleolithic 50,000 Jahre 3 1,813 3
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Northwest Africa (Maghreb)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1A1 is found include:

  1. Amazigh (Berber) populations of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia
  2. Canary Islanders (prehispanic Guanche descendants and modern island populations)
  3. Coastal North African groups (general Moroccan, Algerian, Tunisian populations)
  4. Southern Iberian populations (western Andalusia and Portugal) at low to moderate frequencies
  5. Central/western Mediterranean island populations (parts of Sicily, Balearic Islands) at low frequencies
  6. Sahelian and West African groups at low frequencies through regional admixture
  7. African‑descended populations in the Americas and Caribbean (diaspora presence and admixture)
  8. Small isolated local communities showing strong founder effects (local Amazigh enclaves and island communities)

Regionale Präsenz

Northern Africa (Maghreb) High
Southwestern Europe (Andalusia, Algarve) & Canary Islands Low
Western Africa (Mauritania, Western Sahara fringe) Low
Western Europe (diaspora communities) Low
Northwest Africa (Maghreb) High
Central/Western Mediterranean Islands Low
Americas (diaspora) Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~50 Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu E1B1B1B2A1A1A1A1A1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Canaanite China_NorthernChina_Xingfulindai Eastern Scythian France_Camp_du_Chateau_LateAntiquity Italy_Sicily_IA_b_Punic Late Bronze Age Armenian Middle Bronze Age Anatolia Middle Bronze Age Armenian Nevalı Çori Culture Portugal_Islamic Punic Culture Roopkund B Group
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-15
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.