Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

G2A2B1B1A

Y-DNA Haplogroup G2A2B1B1A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig G2A2B1B1A

Origins and Evolution

G2A2B1B1A is a terminal/low-frequency subclade nested within G2A2B1B1, itself a descendant of the broader G2A lineage that is strongly associated with early Neolithic farmers originating in Anatolia and the Near East. Based on its phylogenetic position downstream of G2A2B1B1 and the estimated age of that parent clade, G2A2B1B1A most likely formed during or shortly after the principal Neolithic expansions into Europe, roughly around 5.0 thousand years ago (kya). Its emergence represents further diversification of farmer-associated Y-chromosome lineages as they adapted to regionally structured populations in Anatolia, the Caucasus and the Mediterranean.

Subclades (if applicable)

At present, G2A2B1B1A appears to be a relatively downstream and often terminal branch in public SNP trees and many testing databases. Where high-resolution SNP testing or whole Y-chromosome sequences are available, researchers sometimes detect further substructure beneath G2A2B1B1A, but these subclades tend to be rare and geographically localized. Continued dense sampling in Anatolia, the Caucasus and Southern Europe is likely to reveal additional internal branches, but current evidence treats G2A2B1B1A as a minor, regionally concentrated clade derived from the broader Neolithic G2A radiation.

Geographical Distribution

The modern and ancient occurrences of G2A2B1B1A reflect the distribution of Neolithic farmer ancestry and later demographic processes. Highest relative frequencies and most consistent occurrences are reported in the Caucasus and Anatolia (modern Turkey and adjacent Levantine areas), with lower but detectable frequencies in parts of Southern Europe—notably Sardinia and some Italian and Mediterranean island populations—and scattered occurrences in the Balkans. In ancient DNA datasets, G2A-related lineages are common among Neolithic farming contexts (e.g., LBK, Cardial) where high-resolution typing allows assignment; G2A2B1B1A specifically is less frequently reported in published ancient samples because many early aDNA studies lacked the SNP resolution to distinguish fine downstream subclades.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because G2A2B1B1A descends from the Neolithic-associated G2A lineage, its historical significance is tied to the spread of agriculture from Anatolia into Europe during the early to middle Holocene. Men carrying G2A-derived Y chromosomes were among the primary paternal contributors to early farmer communities in Europe. The subsequent rarity of G2A2B1B1A in many modern populations reflects later demographic events—Bronze Age migrations, local founder effects, and the expansion of other male lineages (e.g., R1b, R1a, J2, E1b1b)—which reshaped Y-chromosome landscapes. In regions like Sardinia and certain Caucasus pockets, relative isolation and continuity of farmer-descended ancestry have allowed some Neolithic-derived lineages, including G2A subclades, to persist at detectable levels.

Conclusion

G2A2B1B1A is best understood as a small, geographically focused offshoot of a major Neolithic farmer haplogroup. It records part of the paternal legacy of the Anatolian/Levantine farmers who spread agriculture into Europe and the Caucasus. While not a high-frequency lineage overall, it provides useful phylogeographic signal for studies of Neolithic demography, regional continuity, and the fine-scale structure of post-Neolithic male lineages. Further high-resolution Y-chromosome sequencing in the Near East, the Caucasus and Mediterranean islands will improve dating and clarify internal substructure for this clade.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis G2A2B1B1A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 G2A2B1B1A Aktuell ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 G2A2B1B1 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 Jahre 1 9 0
3 G2A2B1B ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 1 9 0
4 G2A2B1 ~7,000 years ago Neolithic 6,800 Jahre 2 70 0
5 G2A2B ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 7,500 Jahre 2 549 3
6 G2A2 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,500 Jahre 2 684 0
7 G2A ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 2 910 14
8 G2 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 989 9
9 G ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 3 1,171 7
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Anatolia / Near East

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup G2A2B1B1A is found include:

  1. Caucasus populations (e.g., Georgians, Armenians, Azerbaijanis)
  2. Anatolian and Near Eastern populations (modern Turkey and nearby Levantine areas)
  3. Southern European populations with strong Neolithic farmer ancestry (e.g., Sardinians, parts of Italy)
  4. Ancient Neolithic farmer contexts across Europe (LBK, Cardial and other early farming sites, when high-resolution SNP data permit assignment)
  5. Scattered occurrences in the Balkans and some Mediterranean island populations

Regionale Präsenz

West Asia / Caucasus Moderate
Southern Europe (Mediterranean / Sardinia) Low
Western Europe Low
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
Caucasus Moderate
Southern Europe Low
Balkans Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe G2A2B1B1A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig G2A2B1B1A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu G2A2B1B1A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Anatolian Iron Age Anatolian Neolithic Aposelemis Culture Avar Culture Byzantine Anatolia Çamlıbel Tarlası Ikiztepe Culture Ksirov Culture Late Anatolian Chalcolithic Roman Empire Starčevo Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-16
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.