Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

I2A1A1A1A1B2

Y-DNA Haplogroup I2A1A1A1A1B2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig I2A1A1A1A1B2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup I2A1A1A1A1B2 is a deeply downstream subclade of haplogroup I2, one of the principal paternal lineages associated with European Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. Because it sits at a very terminal position in the phylogenetic tree, this branch almost certainly reflects a recent local diversification within a much older European lineage rather than an ancient continental-wide expansion.

The most reasonable inference from its parent clade context is that I2A1A1A1A1B2 formed in or near southeastern Europe, probably in a zone where Balkan, Carpathian, and Aegean populations interacted during the late Neolithic and early Bronze Age. Its estimated age is therefore best placed in the mid-Holocene, around 6.5 kya, though the exact formation time is uncertain and could be somewhat older or younger depending on future high-resolution phylogenetic sampling.

Subclades

As a highly derived terminal lineage, I2A1A1A1A1B2 may currently have few or no widely established downstream branches in public datasets. In practice, this kind of clade often represents a small paternal founder line that survived through one or more localized demographic bottlenecks.

The broader parent lineage I2A1A1A1A1B is the key phylogenetic context for interpreting this haplogroup. Subclade structure in such rare branches can be revised as additional ancient DNA and modern SNP data become available.

Geographical Distribution

Modern occurrences of I2A1A1A1A1B2 are expected to be rare and geographically scattered, with the strongest signal likely in the Balkans and nearby parts of southeastern and central Europe. Its presence in more distant regions is most plausibly explained by historical migrations, military movements, and recent diaspora rather than by broad ancient population replacement.

Where detected, this lineage is consistent with low-frequency appearances in:

  • Balkan populations
  • East Slavic populations
  • Central European populations
  • Scandinavian populations
  • Germanic-speaking populations
  • British and Irish populations
  • Baltic populations
  • Recent diaspora communities in the Americas and Australia

Historical and Cultural Significance

Haplogroup I2 is often linked to the paternal legacy of European hunter-gatherers, especially in prehistoric contexts. While I2A1A1A1A1B2 itself is too rare and too downstream to be tied securely to a single archaeological culture, its regional context makes it plausible that its ancestors persisted through communities shaped by the Neolithic transition, post-Neolithic Balkan interactions, and later Bronze Age demographic shifts.

Because the lineage is so rare, it should not be over-attributed to any one culture. Still, the broader I2 paternal background is relevant to ancient populations in southeastern and central Europe, and terminal branches such as this one can survive as localized founder lineages within later ethno-linguistic groups. In modern genetics, this kind of haplogroup is often encountered in individuals with ancestry from areas where long-term continuity and repeated admixture both shaped the paternal landscape.

Conclusion

I2A1A1A1A1B2 is a rare, highly derived subclade of I2, likely originating in southeastern Europe during the mid-Holocene. Its current distribution is limited and patchy, reflecting a combination of ancient regional continuity, small founder effects, and later historical dispersals across Europe and beyond.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis I2A1A1A1A1B2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 I2A1A1A1A1B2 Aktuell ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,500 Jahre 1 0 0
2 I2A1A1A1A1B ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 1 7 0
3 I2A1A1A1A1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 2 62 0
4 I2A1A1A1A ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 2 91 2
5 I2A1A1A1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 104 0
6 I2A1A1A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 210 0
7 I2A1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 240 0
8 I2A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 720 39
9 I2A1 ~16,000 years ago Mesolithic 16,000 Jahre 2 933 0
10 I2A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 1,551 24
11 I2 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 1,785 10
12 I ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 4 3,486 79
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Southeastern Europe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup I2A1A1A1A1B2 is found include:

  1. Balkan populations
  2. East Slavic populations
  3. Central European populations
  4. Scandinavian populations
  5. German and Austrian populations
  6. British and Irish populations
  7. Baltic populations
  8. Recent diaspora populations in the Americas and Australia

Regionale Präsenz

Southeastern Europe (Balkans) High
Southern Europe (Adriatic islands, coastal areas) Moderate
Central Europe (adjacent to Balkans) Moderate
Western Europe Low
Eastern Europe Low
Southeastern Europe High
Northern Europe Low
North America Low
Australia and Oceania Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~6.5k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe I2A1A1A1A1B2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig I2A1A1A1A1B2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu I2A1A1A1A1B2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

890 British Late Iron Age French Chalcolithic French Neolithic Phoenician Portugal_N Portuguese Chalcolithic Proto-Nuragic Remedello Southwest Iberian Tunisia_Punic-oAfrica
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.