Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B is a deeply nested subclade within J2a, one of the major paternal lineages of West Eurasia. Because it sits far downstream on the phylogenetic tree, it represents a very specific branch that likely formed relatively recently compared with the age of the broader J2 lineage. The best-supported inference from its phylogenetic position is that it emerged somewhere in the Near East, where J2a and many of its descendant branches show their greatest diversity.

As with many rare terminal or near-terminal Y-chromosome branches, the distribution of J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B probably reflects small-scale founder effects, local continuity, and drift rather than a major demographic expansion. Its presence at low frequency in multiple neighboring regions suggests the lineage may have persisted through repeated population movements in the ancient Near East and surrounding areas.

Subclades

Because this haplogroup is already highly derived, it may have few or no widely reported downstream branches in public datasets. In practice, lineages at this level are often identified through high-resolution Y-chromosome sequencing and can be further resolved as additional samples become available.

Its parent clade, J2a, is itself a widespread lineage associated with Neolithic and post-Neolithic dispersals across the Levant, Anatolia, Mesopotamia, the Caucasus, Iran, and parts of Europe. J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B should therefore be understood as a rare local offshoot within this larger and historically important paternal framework.

Geographical Distribution

Current evidence and reasonable phylogeographic inference suggest that J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B is most likely to be found at very low frequencies in populations of the Levant, Anatolia, the Caucasus, Mesopotamia, the Iranian plateau, and the Arabian Peninsula, with occasional appearance in Jewish diasporic groups and Southeastern European populations through historical gene flow.

Because the lineage is rare, its apparent distribution may be shaped by sampling limitations. Many observations likely come from genealogical testing, regional reference panels, or deep sequencing projects rather than broad population-wide surveys.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader J2a clade is often discussed in relation to the spread of early farming communities, later Bronze Age mobility, and the complex population history of the ancient Near East. While there is no strong evidence that J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B itself was tied to a specific archaeological culture, it almost certainly developed within a regional milieu shaped by Neolithic and Bronze Age population structure in Southwest Asia.

Its rarity also makes it useful for tracing deep paternal continuity within small or endogamous communities. In some cases, highly specific J2 subclades have been found in Jewish, Anatolian, Levantine, or Caucasus-associated lineages, but any such assignment for this branch should be treated cautiously unless supported by direct phylogenetic and population-level evidence.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B is a very rare and highly specialized branch of J2a that likely originated in the Near East and persisted through localized descent. Its scientific significance lies less in broad migratory expansion and more in what it reveals about fine-scale paternal structure, continuity, and regional diversity in ancient West Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 J2A1A1A2B2A1B1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 J2A1A1A2B2A1B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 J2A1A1A2B2A1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 92 0
5 J2A1A1A2B2A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 3 96 1
6 J2A1A1A2B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 1 180 0
7 J2A1A1A2B ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,800 Jahre 2 183 1
8 J2A1A1A2 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 Jahre 2 183 0
9 J2A1A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,500 Jahre 1 183 2
10 J2A1A1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 2 196 0
11 J2A1A ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 2 234 0
12 J2A1 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 559 0
13 J2A ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 684 6
14 J2 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 1,074 7
15 J ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 3 1,968 16

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Near East

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B is found include:

  1. Levantine populations
  2. Anatolian populations
  3. Caucasus populations
  4. Mesopotamian populations
  5. Iranian plateau populations
  6. Arabian Peninsula populations
  7. Jewish populations
  8. Southeastern European populations

Regionale Präsenz

Western Asia (Anatolia / Levant) High
Southern Europe (Aegean, Italy, Balkans) Moderate
North Africa (Mediterranean coast) Low
Caucasus Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Central Asia Low
Southeastern Europe Low
North Africa Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu J2A1A1A2B2A1B1B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Canaanite Early Bronze Anatolia Hagios Charalambos Culture Italy_Sicily_IA_b_Punic Kura-Araxes Late Anatolian Chalcolithic Nubian Christian Pantikapaion Roman Empire Tell Atchana
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.