Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B is a deeply nested subclade of J2a, placing it within one of the major paternal lineages that expanded from the Near East into surrounding regions during the prehistoric Holocene. Because this branch is highly derived and extremely rare, it is best understood as a local founder line rather than a widespread macro-lineage.

The parent clade J2a is strongly associated with demographic processes linked to early farming communities, post-Neolithic population growth, and later Bronze Age mobility across Anatolia, the Levant, Mesopotamia, the Caucasus, and the Iranian plateau. By contrast, J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B likely arose much later within that broader Near Eastern genetic background, probably through a small lineage that persisted in one or a few connected populations.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal subclade of J2A1A1A2B2A3B1, this haplogroup currently appears to represent a very fine-scale branch with no broadly established downstream structure in the public literature. In practical terms, this means that its historical interpretation depends heavily on the distribution of the parent clade and on any future high-resolution sequencing that may identify additional sister or descendant branches.

Geographical Distribution

Available evidence and phylogenetic context suggest that J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B is most likely concentrated in the Near East and adjacent zones rather than being widely dispersed. The broader J2a phylogeny is found in Levantine, Anatolian, Mesopotamian, Caucasus, Iranian, and Arabian populations, with secondary presence in parts of Southeastern Europe due to ancient and historic gene flow.

Because this specific subclade is rare, its observed distribution probably reflects a combination of sampling limits, small founder population size, and localized survival rather than a truly pan-regional presence. In population genetic terms, such lineages often appear in families or small clusters within historically connected populations.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader J2a lineage has been associated with the spread of agricultural societies, transregional trade networks, and later urban and imperial interactions in the ancient Near East and eastern Mediterranean. While no single archaeological culture can be securely assigned to this very specific subclade, its ancestry fits well within contexts such as Neolithic Anatolia, Levantine early farming communities, Chalcolithic and Bronze Age Near Eastern populations, and later historical-era Jewish, Levantine, Anatolian, and Caucasian communities.

For rare lineages like J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B, cultural attribution is necessarily cautious. The best-supported inference is that it emerged within a Near Eastern population continuum shaped by repeated migrations, local continuity, and social structuring over millennia.

Conclusion

J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B is a rare, highly derived J2a paternal lineage with a probable origin in the Near East around the late Holocene. Its significance lies less in broad geographic spread and more in what it reveals about fine-scale descent, founder effects, and the deep population history of the Near East and surrounding regions.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 J2A1A1A2B2A3B1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
3 J2A1A1A2B2A3B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 1
4 J2A1A1A2B2A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 J2A1A1A2B2A ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 3 96 1
6 J2A1A1A2B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 1 180 0
7 J2A1A1A2B ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,800 Jahre 2 183 1
8 J2A1A1A2 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 5,500 Jahre 2 183 0
9 J2A1A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,500 Jahre 1 183 2
10 J2A1A1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 2 196 0
11 J2A1A ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 2 234 0
12 J2A1 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 559 0
13 J2A ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 684 6
14 J2 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 1,074 7
15 J ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 3 1,968 16

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Near East

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where YDNA haplogroup J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B is found include:

  1. Levantine populations
  2. Anatolian populations
  3. Caucasus populations
  4. Mesopotamian populations
  5. Iranian plateau populations
  6. Arabian Peninsula populations
  7. Jewish populations
  8. Southeastern European populations

Regionale Präsenz

Western Asia / Near East High
Southern Europe Low
Northern Africa (Mediterranean coast) Low
Eastern Mediterranean / Balkans Low
Southwest Asia (Caucasus) Low
South Asia (northwest) Very Low
Levant Moderate
Anatolia Moderate
Caucasus Low
Mesopotamia Low
Iranian Plateau Low
Arabian Peninsula Low
Southeastern Europe Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu J2A1A1A2B2A3B1B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Anatolian Bronze Age Armenian LBA-EIA Byzantine Culture Early Bronze Anatolia Late Anatolian Chalcolithic Piliny-Kyjatice Roman Hispania Sasanian Armenian Tell Atchana Tiryns Culture Turkey_Catalhoyuk_MN
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.