Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

N1B1

Y-DNA Haplogroup N1B1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig N1B1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup N1b1 is a subclade of N1b, itself part of haplogroup N, one of the major paternal lineages that expanded across northern Eurasia. In phylogenetic terms, N1b1 represents an intermediate branch within the broader northern Eurasian forest-zone lineage complex, and its history is tied to population movements between northeastern Europe, the Ural region, and western Siberia.

The deeper ancestry of haplogroup N is generally linked to Late Pleistocene northern Eurasia, with later diversification occurring after the Last Glacial Maximum as human groups expanded into forest and subarctic environments. N1b1 likely emerged during this postglacial period, when paternal lineages were differentiating among populations that would later contribute to Uralic-speaking and other northern Eurasian communities. While exact dating varies by phylogenetic reconstruction, a reasonable estimate places the origin of N1b1 in the Holocene, roughly around 20 kya, with subsequent regional diversification.

Subclades

As an intermediate clade, N1b1 serves as a bridge between the broader parental lineage and more specific downstream branches. Its internal structure can vary depending on the reference phylogeny used, but in general it is part of the expanding set of subclades that trace the regional branching of haplogroup N across northern Eurasia. More derived lineages within this neighborhood of the tree are often associated with Finnic, Sámi, Volga-Uralic, and Siberian populations.

Geographical Distribution

N1b1 is found most often in northern and northeastern Europe and in northern Asia, especially among populations with historical or linguistic ties to the Uralic sphere. It is particularly relevant in Finnish and Baltic-Finnic populations, as well as in Sámi groups of northern Fennoscandia and among several Volga-Uralic peoples such as the Komi. Related northern Eurasian subclades occur in Khanty, Mansi, Nenets, Yakuts, and other Siberian populations, reflecting the broad forest-belt distribution of haplogroup N lineages.

At lower frequencies, N1b1 or closely related downstream lineages may also appear in neighboring Baltic, Russian, and other East European populations due to historical admixture, as well as in some Central Asian and East Asian groups through deeper dispersal events within haplogroup N.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Haplogroup N lineages, including N1b1, are often discussed in relation to the spread of Uralic languages and the demographic history of the circum-Baltic and Siberian forest zones. The distribution of N1b1 aligns with long-term interactions among hunter-gatherer, fisher, and later agro-pastoral populations in northern Eurasia.

From an archaeological perspective, this lineage is best understood as part of the broader population history that followed the Mesolithic and Neolithic transition in the north, with significant regional restructuring during the Bronze Age and Iron Age as mobility increased and ethnolinguistic formations became more complex. Unlike some lineages tightly associated with one archaeological culture, N1b1 is more accurately viewed as a regional paternal signature that persisted across multiple cultural horizons in the forest zone.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup N1b1 is an important northern Eurasian paternal lineage that helps connect the broader history of haplogroup N to the demographic history of Finnic, Sámi, Uralic, and Siberian populations. Its presence across northeastern Europe and northern Asia reflects ancient postglacial expansions, long-distance forest-zone connectivity, and later population movements that shaped the genetic landscape of northern Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis N1B1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 N1B1 Aktuell ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 N1B ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 17 0
3 N1 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 2 80 14
4 N ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 172 17
5 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

North Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup N1b1 is found include:

  1. Finnish and other Baltic-Finnic populations
  2. Estonian, Latvian, and Lithuanian populations
  3. Sámi populations of northern Fennoscandia
  4. Uralic-speaking populations such as the Khanty, Mansi, Nenets, and Komi
  5. Siberian populations including Yakuts and other northern Asian groups
  6. Ancient and modern populations of northern and northeastern Europe
  7. Some East Asian and Central Asian populations through deeper and downstream branches

Regionale Präsenz

Northeast Asia / Siberia High
Northern Europe (Fennoscandia) Moderate
Eastern Europe (northern zones) Moderate
Baltic Region Low
Central Asia (scattered) Low
Northern Asia Moderate
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  2. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe N1B1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig N1B1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu N1B1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

China_LN_Xiaoheyan China_Roman_LateAntiquity China_Shandong_Dinggong_LN China_Tibet_Sangdalongguo_IA Coastal Neolithic Fatyanovo Longsangquduo Culture Piyangjiweng Culture Yusa Culture Zongri Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.