Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B1A3A1B2

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A3A1B2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B1A3A1B2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A3A1B2 is a highly derived subclade within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits deep within a recently diversified branch, its formation is best understood as the result of regional founder effects, drift, and lineage expansion after the major prehistoric spread of R1a across Eurasia. Its estimated origin is relatively recent, on the order of about 2 thousand years ago, though the deeper ancestry of its paternal line traces back to much older Bronze Age steppe-associated R1a expansions.

The parent clade context suggests an origin in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian Steppe, followed by dispersal into neighboring regions. The very fine branching structure of this lineage indicates that its current distribution likely reflects historical demographic processes such as clan growth, migration, bottlenecks, and local founder events rather than a single ancient migration episode.

Subclades

As a downstream branch of R1A1A1B1A3A1B, this haplogroup belongs to a highly nested part of the R1a phylogeny. In practice, subclades at this level are often identified in high-resolution Y-chromosome sequencing and may be informative for tracing recent paternal ancestry within populations rather than broad prehistoric movements.

Because it is so derived, the lineage may have additional private or near-private substructure not yet widely characterized in public datasets. Its biological and historical interpretation therefore depends heavily on sampling density and regional representation in genetic studies.

Geographical Distribution

This lineage is expected to be found primarily in Eastern Europe, especially among Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians, and in the Baltic region among Lithuanians and Latvians. It may also appear at lower frequencies in Scandinavia, Central Asia, South Asia, and scattered West Eurasian populations.

The broader R1a background is particularly common in populations with strong historical or genetic ties to steppe-derived expansions, including Indo-European-speaking groups, some Iranian-speaking groups, and certain Uralic- and Siberian-associated populations. For this specific downstream branch, the distribution is likely patchier and more localized than for its parent haplogroups.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although R1A1A1B1A3A1B2 itself is too recent and too finely defined to be tied confidently to a single archaeological culture, its paternal background is connected to major prehistoric and historic processes in Eurasia. The larger R1a lineage is often associated in population genetics with the Corded Ware horizon, steppe pastoralist expansions, and later movements that helped shape the genetic landscape of Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and South Asia.

At the level of this subclade, the most meaningful historical signal is likely regional continuity and founder-line propagation in the post-Bronze Age period. Such lineages can become enriched in specific local populations through patrilineal social structure, elite expansion, or community endogamy, making them useful markers for recent population history.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A3A1B2 is a recent, highly derived paternal lineage nested within the widespread R1a family. Its presence most likely reflects localized expansion within Eurasia after the Bronze Age, with strongest expected concentrations in Eastern Europe and the Baltic region and secondary appearances across Central Asia, South Asia, and parts of Northern Europe. As with many very deep subclades, its importance lies in illuminating fine-scale paternal ancestry and recent demographic history rather than defining a broad ancient migration by itself.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B1A3A1B2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B1A3A1B2 Aktuell ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1A1A1B1A3A1B ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 3 0 0
3 R1A1A1B1A3A1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 21 0
4 R1A1A1B1A3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 32 18
5 R1A1A1B1A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 45 0
6 R1A1A1B1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 808 5
7 R1A1A1B1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 1 852 0
8 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
9 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
10 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
11 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
12 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (2)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe or Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A3A1B2 haplogroup is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Northern Europe Low
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
Caucasus / Near East Low
Baltic Region Moderate
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~2k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B1A3A1B2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B1A3A1B2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B1A3A1B2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

1984 Faroese Norse Norse Greenland Norse Iron Age Norse Pagan Norse-Irish Viking Viking Culture Zealand Saxon
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.