Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B2A1A2C1

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B2A1A2C1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B2A1A2C1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2a1a2C1 is a terminal downstream branch of the broader R1a paternal lineage, one of the most important Y-chromosome clades in Eurasia. Its position in the phylogenetic tree indicates that it belongs to a set of relatively recent subclades that emerged after the major post-glacial and post-Neolithic expansions of R1a, most likely in a steppe-connected East European or western Eurasian setting.

Based on its placement within R1a and the distribution of its related lineages, this branch is best understood as part of the demographic processes that spread Indo-European-associated paternal lineages across the Eurasian steppe corridor. A formation time around 3 thousand years ago is a reasonable estimate, placing its origin in the Late Bronze Age or early Iron Age.

Subclades

R1a1a1b2a1a2C1 is itself an intermediate terminal branch within a larger and more complex phylogenetic cluster. In practical terms, it helps connect parent and child lineages within the R1a tree, and it may contain additional downstream branches that are not yet widely sampled or fully resolved in public datasets.

Because Y-DNA phylogenies are continually refined as more genomes are sequenced, the exact branching order and age estimates for this lineage may be updated over time. However, its phylogenetic context strongly suggests a post-Neolithic, steppe-associated paternal lineage rather than a deeply ancient Paleolithic one.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be found at low to moderate frequency across a broad swath of Eurasia, with its strongest representation likely in Eastern Europe and adjacent regions. Its known and inferred presence in Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Russians, Lithuanians, Latvians, Scandinavians, Central Asians, Indo-Aryan-speaking South Asians, Iranian-speaking groups, Siberian populations, and some Uralic-speaking populations fits the wider historical dispersal pattern of R1a lineages.

In Eastern Europe and the Baltic region, this clade likely reflects the long-term persistence and diversification of R1a paternal lines after the Bronze Age. In Central and South Asia, it may be associated with later historical and prehistoric migrations linked to steppe-derived ancestry. In Scandinavia and among some Uralic and Siberian groups, it may represent secondary west-to-east or east-to-west gene flow, often mediated by historical contact networks rather than a single founding event.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader R1a lineage is frequently discussed in relation to Bronze Age steppe expansions, the spread of Indo-European languages, and the formation of regional paternal lineages across Eurasia. While R1a1a1b2a1a2C1 should not be over-interpreted as a direct marker of any single ethnolinguistic identity, its distribution is consistent with the kinds of demographic expansions associated with Corded Ware, later steppe-derived populations, and subsequent Iron Age and historic-period movements.

In South Asia, R1a subclades are often found among groups with Indo-Aryan linguistic and cultural histories, though the presence of any specific downstream subclade reflects a complex mixture of ancient steppe ancestry, local demographic growth, and later founder effects. In Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, and parts of Scandinavia, this haplogroup is part of the wider landscape of R1a diversity that became prominent after the Bronze Age.

Conclusion

R1a1a1b2a1a2C1 is a recent Eurasian R1a subclade that likely originated in a steppe-connected West Eurasian context around 3 kya and later dispersed through multiple population histories across Europe and Asia. Its value in genetic genealogy lies in tracing fine-scale paternal relatedness within the broader R1a expansion, especially in regions shaped by Bronze Age and later historical migrations.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B2A1A2C1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B2A1A2C1 Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1A1A1B2A1A2C ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 84 0
3 R1A1A1B2A1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 84 0
4 R1A1A1B2A1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 213 0
5 R1A1A1B2A1 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 214 0
6 R1A1A1B2A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 306 0
7 R1A1A1B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 423 0
8 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
9 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
10 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
11 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
12 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe / Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2a1a2C1 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Baltic States Moderate
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
Western Europe Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
West Asia Low
Siberia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B2A1A2C1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B2A1A2C1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B2A1A2C1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Butkara Culture Jirentaigoukou Culture Loebanr Culture Middle Bronze Ukraine Mongun-Taiga Culture Mtwapa Saka Sintashta Culture Srubnaya Culture Srubnaya-Alakul Tagar Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.