Cantona: Urban craft and contested chronologies
Cantona (site or historical name, not a self-designation for every ancient or living resident)
Residential compounds, circulation routes, ballcourts and obsidian production reveal a worked urban landscape. Competing chronologies make Cantona a useful case for explaining sampling and context rather than presenting one unquestioned peak date.
Comunidades, cidades e evidências
Paisagens e ligações regionais
The Oriental basin and volcanic terrain connected local building materials and obsidian work with regional exchange.
Organização política e escala comunitária
The synthesis discusses sociopolitical organization and proposed state workshops; these are research interpretations, not a recorded constitution or homogeneous ethnicity.
Transformação colonial, património vivo e recepção moderna
Modern research revises phase models. A proposed occupation peak must remain tied to the tested structures and selected samples.
The archaeological synthesis treats residences, storage and circulation as well as civic spaces.
The dating study changes its proposed peak interval after excluding samples of doubtful context.
INAH notes that the proposed Caltonac name lacks evidence of ancient usage.
Uma cronologia breve e documentada
Estes marcos servem de orientação e não constituem uma história completa.
-
Regional sequence proposed
The synthesis compares Cantona's sequence with surrounding basin settlements.
-
Broad sample calculation
The radiocarbon study first calculates this peak interval from its larger sample set, not a universally accepted city chronology.
-
Context-filtered calculation
Excluding doubtful contexts narrows the study's proposed interval; this is a model result, not a new historical event.
Famílias, trabalho, língua e crenças
Línguas mencionadas neste perfil
- No secure spoken-language assignment from these registered sources.
Família linguística: Evidence-specific language context; no uniform assignment
The archaeological synthesis treats residences, storage and circulation as well as civic spaces.
The dating study changes its proposed peak interval after excluding samples of doubtful context.
Independent DNAGENICS AI-assisted educational summaries, not reproductions of the cited works or professional scholarly review. Cited communities, museums, researchers, universities, heritage authorities, UNESCO and publishers did not author or endorse this atlas. Names identify sources only; no logos, source imagery, human remains, restricted cultural expressions or sensitive coordinates are reproduced. Public availability does not establish cultural consent. Use the site's contact channel for corrections or concerns.
Pergunta sobre este perfil revisto
O guia pode explicar e relacionar fatos que já aparecem nesta página. Não pode procurar na web aberta, estabelecer identidade ou cidadania, nem avaliar ascendência ou informação genética.
Interpretação de similaridade genética gerada por IA, sem comprovação de ancestralidade. Conteúdo informativo, sem caráter de orientação profissional.
Ler o aviso completo
Antes de continuar, saiba que a análise será produzida por um modelo de IA. O conteúdo pode ser incompleto, impreciso ou incorreto. Ele descreve similaridade genética estatística com populações de referência e não comprova ancestralidade, etnia, identidade ou descendência. Destina-se apenas a fins informativos e educacionais e não constitui orientação médica, diagnóstica, genealógica, jurídica ou de outra natureza profissional. Não se baseie nele para tomar decisões de saúde, financeiras, jurídicas ou familiares. Na medida permitida pela legislação aplicável, a DNA Genics, S.L. não assume responsabilidade por perdas ou decisões decorrentes do uso desse conteúdo.
Fontes usadas nesta página
Prefer Indigenous institutions, national heritage authorities, accountable archaeological projects, academic editions and institutional museums. Attribute source titles, publishers, dates and stable links. Institutional accounts can disagree: heritage summaries are not neutral censuses, and names or visual styles cannot settle identity. Distinguish original observations, interpretations, transmitted traditions and modern conservation notices.
-
C1
Atlas de los Pueblos Indígenas de México
INPI and INALI · Living-peoples linguistic-grouping methodology, not ancient territorial evidence · Undated institutional resource; accessed 2026-10-20
-
C2
Códice Florentino Digital
Getty Research Institute · Accountable bilingual colonial manuscript edition with contextual interpretation · 1577 manuscript; digital institutional edition accessed 2026-10-20
-
C3
Chichen Itza and the Toltec Question
Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) · Institutional discussion of competing archaeological interpretations · Undated institutional resource; accessed 2026-10-20
-
C4
Copan's Hieroglyphic Stairway
Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University · Epigraphic research and reconstruction history · Undated institutional resource; accessed 2026-10-20
-
C5
Parque Arqueológico Joya de Cerén cumplirá 32 años de ser Monumento Nacional
Ministerio de Cultura de El Salvador · Institutional archaeological or museum account · 2021-08-16
-
C6
National Archaeological Park Tak’alik Ab’aj
UNESCO World Heritage Centre · World Heritage description; interpretation is not a census or community endorsement · Living institutional record; accessed 2026-10-20
-
C7
Reabre el Museo de Chalcatzingo con la exhibición del monolito Portal al Inframundo
Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) · Institutional archaeological or museum account · 2025-02-18
-
C8
El museo de un lugar excepcional
Luis Manuel Gamboa Cabezas, Centro INAH Hidalgo · Institutional archaeological or museum account · Undated institutional resource; accessed 2026-10-20
-
S1
Cantona: un bosquejo de su desarrollo cultural
Ángel García Cook, Arqueología 57, INAH · Original archaeological synthesis · 2020-05-08 (online record)
-
S2
Estudio de las fechas determinadas para Cantona por el laboratorio del INAH
María Magdalena de los Rios Paredes, Arqueología 57, INAH · Radiocarbon study; proposed chronology, not consensus date · 2020-05-08 (online record)
-
S3
Zona Arqueológica de Cantona
Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH) · Institutional archaeological or museum account · Undated institutional resource; accessed 2026-10-20
Revisión editorial: 20 outubro 2026