Menu
Store
Blog
Portrait reconstruction of I13970
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Tanzania in the Africa East Pastoralist era

I13970
50 BCE - 60 BCE
Female
Prehistoric in Tanzania
Tanzania
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

I13970

Date Range

50 BCE - 60 BCE

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

L3h1a2a1

Cultural Period

Prehistoric in Tanzania

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Tanzania
Locality Gishimangeda Cave
Coordinates -3.4800, 35.3500
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

I13970 50 BCE - 60 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The prehistoric era of Tanzania is a fascinating period in the African Stone Age, marked by significant evolutionary, cultural, and technological developments. This era spans from around 2.6 million years ago to the advent of the Iron Age and provides insight into some of the earliest chapters in human history.

The Oldowan Industry (ca. 2.6 million – 1.7 million years ago)

The Oldowan is one of the earliest known stone tool industries, and its origins are closely linked to eastern Africa, particularly the regions within Tanzania. This industry is characterized by the production of simple tools, mostly made by striking river pebbles to create sharp flakes. These tools were likely used for processing plant material and butchering animal carcasses. The famous archaeological site of Olduvai Gorge in northern Tanzania is one of the most important Paleoanthropological sites in the world, made renowned by the work of Louis and Mary Leakey. It provides a rich repository of early Oldowan tools and fossilized remains of hominins, including some of the earliest evidence of Homo habilis, an early human species.

The Acheulean Industry (ca. 1.7 million - 200,000 years ago)

Following the Oldowan, the Acheulean industry developed, characterized by the production of more sophisticated hand axes and cleavers. The Acheulean tools reflect an advance in cognitive abilities and craftsmanship, illustrating more strategic planning and complex social interactions. The site of Isimila, located near Iringa in the southern highlands of Tanzania, is an exemplary Acheulean site. It showcases a large number of hand axes and tools, suggesting a well-developed tradition of tool-making that persisted for hundreds of thousands of years.

Middle Stone Age (ca. 300,000 – 50,000 years ago)

Transitioning into the Middle Stone Age (MSA), Tanzania saw further advancements in tool technology and cognitive abilities. Tools from this period include prepared core techniques, such as the Levallois technique, which demonstrates a marked improvement in the efficiency of tool production. In addition, there is evidence suggesting the beginnings of symbolic behavior. This period saw the continued evolution of Homo sapiens, who increasingly exhibited modern behavioral characteristics.

Later Stone Age (ca. 50,000 – 10,000 years ago)

The Later Stone Age (LSA) marked a period where human culture became recognizably more complex and human populations began expanding. This era is characterized by the production of microlithic tools, including blades and arrowheads. These tools were often composite implements, with the stone being hafted onto wood or bone to create more complex weapons and tools. Rock art sites, such as those found in the Kondoa Rock-Art Sites in central Tanzania, provide evidence of early human symbolic expression and spirituality, depicting a range of images from animals to abstract symbols.

Subsistence and Environment

Throughout these periods, the prehistoric inhabitants of Tanzania adapted to a variety of ecological niches, from savannahs to forests. Early hominins likely had a varied diet that included both plant and animal resources. As hunting techniques improved and tool use became more sophisticated, there was likely an increase in the reliance on animal protein.

Acheulean to Iron Age Transition

The transition from the Stone Age to the Iron Age in Tanzania was gradual. The development and use of metal did not completely replace stone tools immediately but existed alongside them for some time. This period set the stage for the rise of more complex societies, eventually leading to the establishment of cultures with intricate social, economic, and political structures.

Conclusion

The prehistoric era of Tanzania is a testament to the ingenuity and adaptability of early hominins and humans. From the basic Oldowan tools to the more elaborate creations of the Later Stone Age, this period laid the foundational elements for human development. The archaeological sites scattered across Tanzania offer invaluable insight into the prehistoric developments that occurred in this region, highlighting its significant role in the epic story of human evolution.

Chapter V

Genetics

The genetic ancestry of this ancient individual

Ancient Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile of I13970 with ancient reference populations, showing the genetic composition in terms of prehistoric ancestral groups.

Ancient Africans 39.5%
Neolithic Farmers 23.1%
Western Steppe Pastoralists 17.0%
Ancient Asians 10.4%
European Hunter-Gatherers 10.1%

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Africa 62.5%
Northern East African 39.7%
Ethiopian 27.9%
Eastern African 11.8%
Congolese & Southern East African 14.5%
South East African 14.5%
North African 7.9%
North African 7.9%
Europe 20.6%
Northwestern European 11.9%
Finnish 11.9%
Southern European 8.7%
Sardinian 7.3%
Balkan 1.4%
Asia 16.9%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 15.3%
Arabian 15.3%
Chinese & Southeast Asian 1.5%
Tibetan 1.5%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in Tanzania in the Africa East Pastoralist era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Sudan Arab Kababish
8.6498
2
Ethiopian Afar
9.0926
3
Baggara Arab Chad A
9.1942
4
Ethiopian Oromo
9.2236
5
Ethiopian Amhara
9.4332
6
Ethiopian Jew
9.4902
7
Ethiopian Agaw
9.6273
8
Ethiopian Tigray
9.6978
9
Saho Eritrean
9.9311
10
Eritrean
10.2173
Chapter VI

Context

Other ancient individuals connected to this sample

Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data

Scientific Publication

Ancient DNA reveals a multistep spread of the first herders into sub-Saharan Africa

Authors Prendergast ME, Lipson M, Sawchuk EA
Abstract

How food production first entered eastern Africa ~5000 years ago and the extent to which people moved with livestock is unclear. We present genome-wide data from 41 individuals associated with Later Stone Age, Pastoral Neolithic (PN), and Iron Age contexts in what are now Kenya and Tanzania to examine the genetic impacts of the spreads of herding and farming. Our results support a multiphase model in which admixture between northeastern African-related peoples and eastern African foragers formed multiple pastoralist groups, including a genetically homogeneous PN cluster. Additional admixture with northeastern and western African-related groups occurred by the Iron Age. These findings support several movements of food producers while rejecting models of minimal admixture with foragers and of genetic differentiation between makers of distinct PN artifacts.

G25 Coordinates

The G25 coordinates for sample I13970 can be used for detailed admixture analysis in our G25 Studio tool.

I13970,-0.22538916,0.05892362,-0.0212996,-0.01676682,-0.00284308,-0.01691784,0.00597036,-0.0027578,0.07876474,-0.0596144,-0.00529574,-0.0045254,0.00360426,-0.00093528,0.0133688,-0.0155552,0.01335512,0.0066601,0.00231904,-0.0055571,0.00212534,0.00709206,-0.0058752,0.00188662,-0.00411723
Analyze in G25 Studio
Use code for 40% off Expires Feb 27