Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A woman buried in South Africa in the Modern era
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in South Africa in the Modern era

A woman buried in South Africa during the South Africa 2200 Years Before Present

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

mfo001
1483 CE - 1644 CE
Female
South Africa
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

mfo001

Date Range

1483 CE - 1644 CE

Cultural Period

South Africa 2200 Years Before Present

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

L3e1b2

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N/A (Female)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country South Africa
Locality Mfongosi
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

mfo001 1483 CE - 1644 CE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

Around 2200 years before the present, approximately 200 BC, South Africa was in a period of transition and cultural dynamism marked by the Bantu expansion. This era predates significant written records specific to Southern Africa's interior, so much of our understanding comes from archaeology, linguistics, and later historiographies.

The Bantu Expansion: By 200 BC, Bantu-speaking peoples were likely migrating into the southern regions of Africa from their original homelands in West-Central Africa. This migration wasn't a single, coordinated movement but a gradual diffusion over centuries. The Bantu expansion is one of the most significant series of migrations in human history, spreading not only people but shared languages, cultures, and technologies across sub-Saharan Africa.

Cultural and Technological Developments:

  • Iron Age: This period in sub-Saharan Africa saw the introduction and refinement of iron-working, which was transformative for societies. The ability to forge iron not only improved agricultural yields with better tools but also enhanced hunting and warfare capabilities.

  • Agriculture: The Bantu brought with them agricultural practices, cultivating crops such as yams, millet, and sorghum. This agricultural knowledge enabled more stable and sedentary communities as opposed to primarily hunter-gatherer lifestyles.

  • Pastoralism: In addition to agriculture, the Bantu expansion included domesticated animals, notably goats and cattle. Cattle, in particular, played a crucial social and economic role, often seen as a symbol of wealth and status within these societies.

Social Structure and Communities:

  • Kinship-Based Societies: Communities were typically organized around kinship groups or clans. These were often hierarchies led by elders or chieftains, with social duties and rights delineated according to age and gender.

  • Settlement Patterns: Bantu-speaking communities often settled in semi-permanent villages. These were usually small, accommodating extended family units, and were sometimes fortified for protection.

Language and Communication: Linguistic studies show that as Bantu-speaking peoples spread, they brought languages that evolved into a variety of dialects and related languages. This linguistic diversity is a testament to the adaptation and integration of Bantu societies across different regions and environments.

Interactions and Trade:

  • Hunter-Gatherer Societies: As Bantu groups moved southward, they interacted with indigenous Khoisan-speaking hunter-gatherer societies. These interactions ranged from trade and cultural exchange to displacement and conflict.

  • Trade Networks: While formal, large-scale trade networks were limited in this period, trade occurred in valuable resources like iron tools and ornaments, pottery, and possibly cattle.

Religious and Spiritual Beliefs: Religious practices during this period were predominantly animistic, with a focus on ancestors and spirits influencing the natural world. Rituals and ceremonies were integral to maintaining social cohesion and environmental balance, often conducted by shamans or spiritual leaders.

Archaeological Evidence: Sites across Southern Africa such as Mapungubwe would later offer insight into these early societies. Logistical data derived from pottery styles, settlement ruins, and iron implements found in these locations provide critical archaeological evidence of the life ways and technological advancement of Bantu-speaking communities.

In summary, around 2200 years ago, Southern Africa was marked by the significant influence of the Bantu expansion, with these peoples gradually introducing transformative cultural, agricultural, and technological changes. These developments laid important foundations for the future complex societies that would emerge in Southern Africa. The era was characterized by adaptation, innovation, and the blending of cultures that shaped the African continent's historical trajectory.

Chapter V

Genetics

These comparisons show genetic similarity, not identity or origin. The populations listed are those whose genomes show statistical alignment to this ancient individual.

Similarity reflects shared history, not shared identity. These are analytical comparisons, not claims about who this person was.

Modern Genetic Admixture

This analysis compares the DNA profile with present-day reference populations, showing what percentage of genetic makeup resembles modern populations from different regions.

Africa 99.9%
West African 50.9%
Nigerian 34.6%
Ghanaian, Liberian, Sierra Leonean 13.1%
Senegambian & Guinean 3.2%
Northern East African 25.1%
Eastern African 25.1%
African Hunter-Gatherer 15.7%
African Hunter-Gatherer 15.7%
Congolese & Southern East African 8.3%
South East African 8.3%

Closest Modern Populations

These are the modern populations showing the closest statistical alignment to A woman buried in South Africa in the Modern era, ranked by genetic distance. Lower distance values indicate closer statistical similarity.

1
Bantu S.E.
2.9917
2
Bantu S.W.
3.4533
3
Makhuwa
5.2721
Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
cha001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1504 CE Champagne Castle, South Africa View
ela001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1419 CE Eland Cave, South Africa View
mfo001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1483 CE Mfongosi, South Africa View
new001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1445 CE Newcastle, South Africa View
doo001 South Africa 2000 Years Before Present 343 BCE Doonside, South Africa View
bab001 South Africa 2000 Years Before Present 163 BCE Ballito Bay B, South Africa View
baa001 South Africa 1900 Years Before Present 38 BCE Ballito Bay A, South Africa View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
cha001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1504 CE Champagne Castle, South Africa View
ela001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1419 CE Eland Cave, South Africa View
mfo001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1483 CE Mfongosi, South Africa View
new001 South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 1445 CE Newcastle, South Africa View
KhoesanLeipzigHunter South Africa 2200 Years Before Present 403 BCE St. Helena, South Africa View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Southern African ancient genomes estimate modern human divergence to 350,000 to 260,000 years ago

Authors Schlebusch CM, Malmström H, Günther T, Sjödin P, Coutinho A et al.
Abstract

Southern Africa is consistently placed as a potential region for the evolution of Homo sapiens We present genome sequences, up to 13x coverage, from seven ancient individuals from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The remains of three Stone Age hunter-gatherers (about 2000 years old) were genetically similar to current-day southern San groups, and those of four Iron Age farmers (300 to 500 years old) were genetically similar to present-day Bantu-language speakers. We estimate that all modern-day Khoe-San groups have been influenced by 9 to 30% genetic admixture from East Africans/Eurasians. Using traditional and new approaches, we estimate the first modern human population divergence time to between 350,000 and 260,000 years ago. This estimate increases the deepest divergence among modern humans, coinciding with anatomical developments of archaic humans into modern humans, as represented in the local fossil record.

G25 Coordinates

These coordinates represent a position in genetic space, a tool for comparison, not a conclusion. You can use these to perform custom admixture analysis in G25 Studio.

mfo001,-0.62780882,0.06185094,0.02092274,0.01694966,-0.0007918,0.00596628,0.02186926,-0.00849052,-0.02056454,0.01507172,0.0049598,-0.01235502,-0.0055313,0.00279332,-0.00716426,0.00158632,0.00062442,0.03664382,-0.01623758,0.00244834,7.8E-06,0.00112776,0.00112224,0.00215204,0.0002658
Continue in G25 Studio
Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 13