Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

T2M

mtDNA Haplogroup T2M

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig T2M

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup T2M is a downstream branch of haplogroup T2, itself a major subclade of haplogroup T within the broader JT lineage. T2 is believed to have formed in the Near East during the Late Pleistocene or early Holocene and to have diversified before and during the Neolithic. T2M appears to have coalesced later than the basal T2 branches, most plausibly during the early to mid-Holocene (on the order of ~9 kya in our estimate), a period that overlaps with the spread of agriculture from the Near East into Europe.

The limited number of observations (including two identified ancient DNA cases in the referenced database) and its relatively low frequency in modern populations indicate that T2M is a comparatively rare and geographically patchy lineage. Its phylogenetic position as a subclade of T2 ties it to the same broad demographic processes that transported other T2 subclades westward into Europe, northward into the Caucasus, and southward into North Africa.

Subclades (if applicable)

As a named subclade (T2M), this lineage may itself contain additional downstream branches in larger datasets, but currently it is described as a distinct subgroup under T2. Where deeper sequencing has been performed, minor private branches and local sublineages can be present, reflecting later founder events and local drift. Continued sampling and full mitogenome sequencing are needed to resolve internal structure and to identify diagnostic mutations that define further subclades of T2M.

Geographical Distribution

T2M shows a distribution pattern concentrated where other T2 lineages are common: Southern, Central and Eastern Europe and the Near East, with lower-frequency occurrences in North Africa, the Caucasus, and parts of Central Asia. In Europe it is more often detected in regions influenced strongly by Neolithic farmer ancestry. Modern occurrences are sporadic and usually at low-to-moderate frequency; the highest densities tend to be in southern and eastern European populations and portions of the Near East. The detection of T2M in ancient samples (two in the referenced database) supports its involvement in prehistoric population movements rather than representing a very recent expansion.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because T2 and many of its subclades are common in populations known to carry Early European Farmer (EEF) ancestry, T2M is best interpreted as part of the maternal legacy of Neolithic agricultural expansions from the Near East into Europe. It may therefore be associated in archaeological contexts with Neolithic farmer cultures (for example, early LBK-related communities in Central Europe) and persists, at lower frequency, through later cultural horizons such as the Bronze Age and into modern populations.

T2M's presence in some Jewish communities (including occasional detection in Ashkenazi samples) and in North Africa and the Caucasus reflects the complex post-Neolithic movements, trade networks, and regional admixture events that redistributed Near Eastern maternal lineages across adjacent regions.

Conclusion

T2M is a localized, low-frequency subclade of the broader T2 maternal lineage, with origins tied to Near Eastern T2 diversity and probable expansion into Europe during the Neolithic. Its rarity in modern datasets and its limited presence in ancient DNA so far mean that additional sequencing of both modern and archaeological samples will be required to clarify its full phylogenetic structure, demographic history, and precise role in past migrations.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis T2M. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 T2M Aktuell ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 0 2 0
2 T2A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 4 214 16
3 T2 ~21,000 years ago Mesolithic 21,000 Jahre 13 1,141 70
4 T ~27,000 years ago Paleolithic 27,000 Jahre 3 1,950 84
5 JT ~40,000 years ago Paleolithic 40,000 Jahre 2 4,094 1
6 R2'JT - - - 2 4,133 0
7 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 Jahre 17 22,830 57
8 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
9 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
10 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
11 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
12 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
13 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
14 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
15 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
16 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (3)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Near East

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup T2M is found include:

  1. Southern, Central and Eastern European populations
  2. Middle Eastern populations (Near East)
  3. North African populations (low frequencies)
  4. Populations in the Caucasus
  5. Some Central Asian groups (sporadic)
  6. Jewish populations (including occasional Ashkenazi detections)
  7. Ancient Neolithic-associated remains (identified in 2 ancient samples)
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~9k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe T2M

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig T2M

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu T2M. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Gumelnița Lengyel Culture Linear Pottery Culture Pottery Neolithic Romanian Neolithic Ukrainian Neolithic
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.