Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

U1*

mtDNA Haplogroup U1*

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig U1*

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup U1 is a moderately deep maternal lineage within haplogroup U that most likely formed in the Near East/Western Asia in the late Upper Paleolithic or early post‑glacial period (the parent U1 is commonly dated to ~28 kya). The designation U1* indicates basal U1 lineages that are not assignable to more derived named subclades; these basal lineages preserve older branches of the U1 phylogeny and can provide direct evidence of early regional continuity in West Asia. As with other branches of U, U1 descends ultimately from haplogroup R and reflects maternal lineages that expanded in West Asia after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from probable refugial populations.

Subclades

U1 has been subdivided into several subclades in the literature (commonly noted sublineages include U1a, U1b and downstream branches identified in high-resolution studies). U1* designates samples that carry U1-defining mutations but lack additional mutations that would place them in a named downstream clade, so U1* can represent either older local lineages or unsampled/rare branches. High-resolution sequencing (complete mitogenomes) increasingly refines the internal structure of U1, revealing geographic patterns for specific subclades (for example, some subclades show enrichment in the Caucasus or in parts of South Asia).

Geographical Distribution

U1 and U1* are most frequent and diverse in the Near East and the Caucasus, consistent with a West Asian origin. The haplogroup is also present at low-to-moderate frequencies in parts of South Asia (India and Pakistan), likely reflecting long-term connections and gene flow between West Asia and South Asia during the Holocene. Scattered occurrences in North Africa and southern/eastern Europe reflect later dispersals and movements (trade, migration, or localized gene flow). Ancient DNA recoveries that include U1 lineages (including three documented occurrences in many databases) demonstrate its presence in archaeological contexts in West Asia and adjacent regions.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because U1 is concentrated in the Near East and the Caucasus and appears in South Asia at lower frequencies, it is often interpreted as part of the maternal genetic substrate of post‑LGM West Asian populations that contributed to later Neolithic and Bronze Age demographic processes. U1 lineages may have been carried by early farming groups who expanded from Anatolia and the Levant, by Chalcolithic and Bronze Age population movements across West Asia, and by later historic trade and migration routes that linked West Asia with South Asia and North Africa. Sporadic presence in some Jewish community studies and regional continuity in Caucasus populations shows how U1 can mark both ancient local continuity and selective episodes of migration.

Conclusion

U1* is a useful marker for studying maternal continuity and migration across West Asia and adjacent regions. As more complete mitogenomes and ancient DNA samples are analyzed, the internal structure of U1 will be better resolved, improving inferences about timing and routes of dispersal into the Caucasus, South Asia, North Africa, and parts of Europe. For now, U1* indicates basal West Asian maternal ancestry with a post‑LGM origin and a pattern of localized persistence combined with episodic long‑distance dispersals.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis U1*. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 U1* Aktuell ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 Jahre 0 3 0
2 U1 ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 Jahre 3 106 0
3 U ~46,000 years ago Paleolithic 46,000 Jahre 5 5,557 110
4 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 Jahre 17 22,830 57
5 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
6 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
7 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
8 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
9 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
10 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
11 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
12 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
13 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (2)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Near East (Western Asia)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup U1 is found include:

  1. Populations of the Near East (e.g., Iran, Levant, Turkey)
  2. Caucasus populations (e.g., Armenians, Georgians, neighboring groups)
  3. South Asian populations (India and Pakistan, at low-to-moderate frequencies)
  4. North African groups (sporadic presence, including some Berber populations)
  5. Southern and Eastern European populations (low-frequency, often reflecting westward gene flow)
  6. Jewish populations (sporadic presence in some community studies)
  7. Small/localized groups showing regional continuity in West Asia and adjacent areas
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~28k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe U1*

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  3. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  4. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  5. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  6. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  7. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig U1*

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu U1*. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Buran-Kaya Cardial Culture Cioclovina Corded Ware Ganj Dareh Culture Geoksyur Culture Georgia_Arukhlo2_N_Caucasus Linear Pottery Culture Pitted Ware Tyumen Ukrainian Neolithic Wartberg
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.